BackgroundImmunogenic Cell Death (ICD) is a novel way to regulate cell death and can sufficiently activate adaptive immune responses. Its role in immunity is still emerging. However, the involvement of ICD in Intracranial Aneurysms (IA) remains unclear. This study aimed to identify biomarkers associated with ICDs and determine the relationship between them and the immune microenvironment during the onset and progression of IAMethodsThe IA gene expression profiles were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in IA were identified and the effects of the ICD on immune microenvironment signatures were studied. Techniques like Lasso, Bayes, DT, FDA, GBM, NNET, RG, SVM, LR, and multivariate analysis were used to identify the ICD gene signatures in IA. A consensus clustering algorithm was used for conducting the unsupervised cluster analysis of the ICD patterns in IA. Furthermore, enrichment analysis was carried out for investigating the various immune responses and other functional pathways. Along with functional annotation, the weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and module construction, identification of the hub gene, and co-expression analysis were also carried out.ResultsThe above techniques were used for establishing the ICD gene signatures of HMGB1, HMGN1, IL33, BCL2, HSPA4, PANX1, TLR9, CLEC7A, and NLRP3 that could easily distinguish IA from normal samples. The unsupervised cluster analysis helped in identifying three ICD gene patterns in different datasets. Gene enrichment analysis revealed that the IA samples showed many differences in pathways such as the cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, regulation of actin cytoskeleton, chemokine signaling pathway, NOD-like receptor signaling pathway, viral protein interaction with the cytokines and cytokine receptors, and a few other signaling pathways compared to normal samples. In addition, the three ICD modification modes showed obvious differences in their immune microenvironment and the biological function pathways. Eight ICD-regulators were identified and showed meaningful associations with IA, suggesting they could severe as potential prognostic biomarkers.ConclusionsA new gene signature for IA based on ICD features was created. This signature shows that the ICD pattern and the immune microenvironment are closely related to IA and provide a basis for optimizing risk monitoring, clinical decision-making, and developing novel treatment strategies for patients with IA.

BackgroundThe role of epigenetic modulation in immunity is receiving increased recognition—particularly in the context of RNA N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modifications. Nevertheless, it is still uncertain whether m6A methylation plays a role in the onset and progression of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). This study aimed to establish the function of m6A RNA methylation in IA, as well as its correlation with the immunological microenvironment.MethodsOur study included a total of 97 samples (64 IA, 33 normal) in the training set and 60 samples (44 IA, 16 normal) in the validation set to systematically assess the pattern of RNA modifications mediated by 22 m6A regulators. The effects of m6A modifications on immune microenvironment features, i.e., immune response gene sets, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes, and infiltrating immune cells were explored. We employed Lasso, machine learning, and logistic regression for the purpose of identifying an m6A regulator gene signature of IA with external data validation. For the unsupervised clustering analysis of m6A modification patterns in IA, consensus clustering methods were employed. Enrichment analysis was used to assess immune response activity along with other functional pathways. The identification of m6A methylation markers was identified based on a protein–protein interaction network and weighted gene co-expression network analysis.ResultsWe identified an m6A regulator signature of IGFBP2, IGFBP1, IGF2BP2, YTHDF3, ALKBH5, RBM15B, LRPPRC, and ELAVL1, which could easily distinguish individuals with IA from healthy individuals. Unsupervised clustering revealed three m6A modification patterns. Gene enrichment analysis illustrated that the tight junction, p53 pathway, and NOTCH signaling pathway varied significantly in m6A modifier patterns. In addition, the three m6A modification patterns showed significant differences in m6A regulator expression, immune microenvironment, and bio-functional pathways. Furthermore, macrophages, activated T cells, and other immune cells were strongly correlated with m6A regulators. Eight m6A indicators were discovered—each with a statistically significant correlation with IA—suggesting their potential as prognostic biological markers.ConclusionOur study demonstrates that m6A RNA methylation and the immunological microenvironment are both intricately correlated with the onset and progression of IA. The novel insight into patterns of m6A modification offers a foundation for the development of innovative treatment approaches for IA.