Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) was previously thought to have a worse prognosis than differentiated gastric carcinoma (DC). However, recent studies have shown that its prognosis is related to staging. Here, we analyzed the clinicopathological features and the rate of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in 2166 patients with gastric cancer (605 early and 1561 advanced cases) who underwent gastrectomy and lymph node dissection (D2) from 2016 to 2019. The LNM rate for early and advanced cases was 18.0% and 74.2%, respectively. Regarding early cases, the LNM rate in SRCC was similar to that in DC (10% vs. 16.1%, p=0.224), and significantly lower than that in undifferentiated carcinoma (UDC; 10% vs. 23.3%, p=0.024). Tumor size, infiltration depth, pathological type, and mixed type were risk factors for LNM in early cases. Regarding intramucosal cases, the LNM rate in SRCC was similar to that in DC (4.3% vs. 3.7%, p=0.852), and significantly lower than that in UDC (11.2%). The LNM rate was significantly higher in submucosal than intramucosal cases (28.1% vs. 6.3%, p<0.001), and in early mixed cases than early pure cases (23.2% vs. 12.4%, p<0.001). Regarding early pure cases, the LNM rate in SRCC was similar to that in DC (9.3% vs. 7.2%, p=0.641), but significantly lower than that in UDC (9.3% vs. 24.7%, p=0.039). In summary, the LNM rate in early SRCC was similar to that in early DC but significantly lower than that in early UDC. Early SRCC fits with the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) indication related to undifferentiated cases, and ESD may be effective. Additionally, the LNM rate was markedly higher for submucosal cases than intramucosal cases, and for mixed cases than pure cases.

BackgroundChronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) can progress to gastric cancer (GC) thus requiring endoscopic surveillance. Here, we analyze various aspects of CAG progression, time, and mucosal background, to guide reasonable surveillance.MethodsCAG patients with three or more endoscopies from 2010–2021 were included. All cases were analyzed for rate and time of progression, and cases with operative link on gastritis assessment (OLGA) staging, operative link on gastric intestinal metaplasia assessment (OLGIM) staging, and Kimura-Takemoto classification were further analyzed. Additional investigation of guideline-defined low-risk patients by reviewing endoscopy in the short-term (1–2 years) after baseline identified several patients as high-risk.ResultsNinety-seven (10.4%) of the 929 CAG patients progressed to low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN), high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN), or GC, during the observation period of 36–129 months (median 53, IQR=24), including 75 (8.1%) cases of LGIN, eight (0.9%) of HGIN, and 14 (1.5%) of GC. Among 170 patients with OLGA/OLGIM at baseline, two (2/2, 100%) GC cases occurred in patients with OLGA/OLGIM III and IV. Of the 236 patients with Kimura-Takemoto classification at baseline, 5/7 (71.4%) cases of GC occurred in patients with C3–O3. Ten, 11, and 25 patients classified as low-risk on the European, British, and Chinese Guidelines, underwent additional endoscopy within 1–2 years, resulting in three (30.0%), four (36.4%), and eight (32.0%) patients being classified as high-risk on these guidelines, respectively.ConclusionA minority of CAG patients can progress to GC. OLGA/OLGIM III and IV staging are closely associated with progression. Disease-associated risk may be underestimated in one-third of patients classified as low-risk by initial endoscopy.

No abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a newly designed self-assembling gel in treating ESD-induced gastric ulcers in patients.Methods: This open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial enrolled patients who underwent ESD between September 2020 and May 2021. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive the gel (applied to cover the entire ulcer bed under endoscopic guidance immediately after ESD; gel group) or not (control group). The primary outcome was the ulcer healing rate at 28 days. And the secondary outcomes were the delayed bleeding, changes in the ulcer stage, and adverse events.Results: Finally, 125 patients (mean age, 63.7 years; 70 [56.0%] males) were enrolled. The ulcer healing rate was higher in the gel group than in the control group at 28 days (96.9 ± 4.1% vs. 94.7 ± 5.0%; p = 0.001). The ulcer reduction rate at 28 days differed significantly (p < 0.001) between ulcers with majority gel coverage (99.8%), ulcers with minority gel coverage (96.2%), and ulcers with no gel coverage (98.0%). Delayed bleeding was found in 1/63 gel-treated patients (1.6%) versus 5/62 controls (8.1%). A1-stage ulcers were found in 16/63 patients in the gel group versus 44/62 patients in the control group (25.4% vs. 71.0%, p < 0.001) at 3–5 days.Conclusion: The newly developed self-assembling gel was safe and effective in accelerating gastric ulcer healing in patients after ESD.Clinical Trial Registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry System (registration number, ChiCTR2100052935).

Upper gastrointestinal tract cancer (UGIC), which includes both gastric and esophageal cancer, is a major threat to human health. Patients in the early stage have a significant chance to obtain a better prognosis, when compared to patients in the advanced stage. Improving the detection rate of early UGIC is important to improve the survival rate and prognosis. The endoscopic screening of UGIC includes opportunistic and population-based screening, and this has been carried out in a few regions. Compared to these two gastroscopy screening strategies, the early detection ability of opportunistic screening is no less than that for population-based screening, and the compliance of population-based participation is better. Considering economic factors, bundled opportunistic gastroscopy screening is cost-effective. Overall, the screening strategy for UGIC is limited by economic, medical and geographical factors, and the prospect of opportunistic screening is considerable.