This research responds to an increasing volume of scholarly literature unpacking the recent dynamics of EU foreign policy discourses and practices vis-à-vis China. Drawing on the theoretical approach of collective securitisation, this article shows that EU foreign policy towards China since the mid-2010s has witnessed increasing collective securitisation moves directed at multiple policy frames, including Asian regional security frame, economic security frame, political security frame and information and technology and cybersecurity frame. The EU's attempts to securitise China as an existential threat across multiple issue areas have been triggered by a combination of long-term trends and specific sets of precipitating events, which contributed to galvanising the EU's collective securitising discourses and subsequent policy initiatives. However, this research finds that the EU's securitising moves and relevant speech acts have not resulted in a coherent audience response among the EU member states. The divergent views held by the EU's internal audience on whether China should be perceived as an existential threat have hampered the implementation of the EU's collective policy outputs.
Renforcer la connectivité entre l’Asie et l’Europe et combler le manque d’infrastructures en Europe centrale et orientale est le principal objectif de l’initiative chinoise des « nouvelles routes de la soie » (Belt and Road Initiative, BRI). Parallèlement, l’UE renforce ses efforts stratégiques visant à relier l’Europe avec d’autres régions du monde. Sa communication conjointe « Relier l’Europe à l’Asie – Éléments fondamentaux d’une stratégie de l’UE », dont l’objectif est de stimuler la connectivité Asie-Europe, en est un exemple éloquent. Dans ce cadre, le présent article explore les perceptions divergentes qu’ont l’UE et la Chine de la connectivité, et ses implications sur la coopération UE-Chine. Nous avançons que l’UE et la Chine ont des approches différentes de la connectivité. Qui plus est, l’écart de perception entre l’UE et la Chine quant au concept de connectivité représente un défi aux efforts de coopération entre les deux acteurs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.