The SEPT9 gene methylation assay is the first FDA-approved blood assay for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Fecal immunochemical test (FIT), FIT-DNA test and CEA assay are also in vitro diagnostic (IVD) tests used in CRC screening. This meta-analysis aims to review the SEPT9 assay performance and compare it with other IVD CRC screening tests. By searching the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CBMdisc and CJFD database, 25 out of 180 studies were identified to report the SEPT9 assay performance. 2613 CRC cases and 6030 controls were included, and sensitivity and specificity were used to evaluate its performance at various algorithms. 1/3 algorithm exhibited the best sensitivity while 2/3 and 1/1 algorithm exhibited the best balance between sensitivity and specificity. The performance of the blood SEPT9 assay is superior to that of the serum protein markers and the FIT test in symptomatic population, while appeared to be less potent than FIT and FIT-DNA tests in asymptomatic population. In conclusion, 1/3 algorithm is recommended for CRC screening, and 2/3 or 1/1 algorithms are suitable for early detection for diagnostic purpose. The SEPT9 assay exhibited better performance in symptomatic population than in asymptomatic population.

POLE/POLD1 gene variants have been suggested as potential markers for immunotherapy due to their significant association with the tumor mutational burden (TMB), an effective indicator for response prediction in immunotherapy. However, the correlation of POLE/POLD1 variants with MSI, MMR, TMB, MMR-related and key driver gene mutations needs to be defined to support patient recruitment and therapeutic effect assessment in immunotherapy. 1,392 Chinese cancer patients were recruited, and the correlation of POLE/POLD1 variants with existing immunotherapeutic markers and cancer pathways was investigated. A next-generation sequencing panel including 605 cancer-related genes was used for variant sequencing. It was found that the frequency of POLE variants was not statistically different from that in COSMIC database, while the frequency of POLD1 variants was significantly higher in lung cancer. c.857 C > G and c.2091dupC were potential high frequency variants in Chinese cancer patients. Patients carrying POLE damaging variants were significantly younger than POLE/POLD1 WT patients. Patients carrying POLE/POLD1 damaging variants exhibited significantly higher TMB and frequency of MMR gene variants than POLE/POLD1 WT patients. Patients with POLE damaging variants also exhibited significantly higher frequency of driver gene variants than POLE/POLD1 WT patients. Further analysis showed that POLE damaging variants may affect the cancer development through MMR, TGFβ and RTK/RAS/RAF signaling pathways, and POLD1 through MMR pathways. In conclusion, this study identified key characteristics and regions of POLE/POLD1 genes that correlates with TMB, MMR gene mutations and key driver gene mutations, and provided theoretical and practical basis for patient selection based on POLE/POLD1 gene status in immunotherapy.

Background: Germline variations may contribute to lung cancer susceptibility besides environmental factors. The influence of germline mutations on lung cancer susceptibility and their correlation with somatic mutations has not been systematically investigated.Methods: In this study, germline mutations from 1,026 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were analyzed with a 58-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel containing known hereditary cancerrelated genes, and were categorized based on American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines in pathogenicity, and the corresponding somatic mutations were analyzed using a 605-gene NGS panel containing known cancer-related genes.Results: Plausible genetic susceptibility was found in 4.7% of lung cancer patients, in which 14 patients with pathogenic mutations (P group) and 34 patients with likely-pathogenic mutations (LP group) were identified. The ratio of the first degree relatives with lung cancer history of the P groups was significantly higher than the Non-P group (P=0.009). The ratio of lung cancer patients with history of other cancers was higher in P (P=0.0007) or LP (P=0.017) group than the Non-P group. Pathogenic mutations fell most commonly in BRCA2, followed by CHEK2 and ATM. Likely-pathogenic mutations fell most commonly in NTRK1 and EXT2, followed by BRIP1 and PALB2. These genes are involved in DNA repair, cell cycle regulation and tumor suppression. By comparing the germline mutation frequency from this study with that from the whole population or East Asian population (gnomAD database), we found that the overall odds ratio (OR) for P or LP group was 17.93 and 15.86, respectively, when compared with the whole population, and was 2.88 and 3.80, respectively, when compared with the East Asian population, suggesting the germline mutations of the P and LP groups were risk factors for lung cancer. Somatic mutation analysis revealed no significant difference in tumor mutation burden (TMB) among the groups, although a trend of lower TMB in the pathogenic group was found. The SNV/INDEL mutation frequency of TP53 in the P group was significantly lower than the other two groups, and the copy number variation (CNV) mutation frequency of PIK3CA and MET was significantly higher than the Non-P group. Pathway enrichment analysis found no significant difference in aberrant pathways among the three groups.Conclusions: A proportion of 4.7% of patients carrying germline variants may be potentially linked to increased susceptibility to lung cancer. Patients with pathogenic germline mutations exhibited stronger family history and higher lung cancer risk.

Algorithm, cancer stage and age are factors affecting the detection rate of the SEPT9 assay, while sex and cancer location appeared to have no influence on its performance.