Background Open surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) has already been widely reported and analyzed. However, the laparoscopic technique for treating HCCA remains controversial because of the lack of radicality and poor assessment of the resectability of hilar structures without direct palpation. The aim of this study was to provide detailed surgical procedures and photographs of this technically demanding operation, describe our experience in assessing resectability before and during surgery, and confirm the radicality of laparoscopic resection of Bismuth type III and IV HCCA. Methods From November 2016 to November 2018, nine patients received laparoscopic resection of Bismuth type III or IV HCCA in our department. Results Laparoscopic right hepatectomy was performed in four patients, and laparoscopic left hepatectomy was performed in five patients. Negative margins were achieved in all patients. Complications were found in two (22.22%) patients, with bile leakage and hepatic insufficiency each in one patient. The patient developing hepatic insufficiency had persistent and ongoing liver failure and finally expired. Conclusion The radicality of laparoscopic resection for Bismuth type III and IV HCCA can be technically improved through extended lymphadenectomy, visual assessment of hilar structures, and frozen section techniques.

Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) remains a rare but lethal complication following laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in the modern era of advanced surgical techniques. The main reason for early PPH (within 24 hours following surgery) has been found to be a failure of hemostasis during the surgical procedure. The reasons for late PPH tend to be variate. Positive associations have been identified between late PPH and intraabdominal erosive factors such as postoperative pancreatic fistula, bile leakage, gastrointestinal fistula, and intraabdominal infection. Still, some patients suffer PPH who do not have these erosive factors. The severity of bleeding and clinical prognosis of erosive and nonerosive PPH following LPD is different. We analyzed the electronic clinical records of 33 consecutive patients undergoing LPD and experiencing one or more episodes of hemorrhage after postoperative day 1 in this study. All patients received an LPD with standard lymphadenectomy. The patient's hemorrhage-related information was extracted, such as interval from surgery to bleeding, presentation, bleeding site, severity, management, and clinical prognosis. Based on our clinical practice, we proposed a treatment strategy for these 2 forms of late PPH following LPD. Of these 33 patients, 8 patients (24.24%) developed nonerosive bleeding, and other 25 patients (75.76%) suffered from postoperative hemorrhage caused by various intraabdominal erosive factors. The median interval from the LPD surgery to postoperative hemorrhage for both groups was 11 days, and no significant differences were found ( P = .387). For patients with erosive bleeding, most (60%) underwent their episodes of bleeding on postoperative days 5 to 14. For patients with nonerosive bleeding, most (75%) began postoperative hemorrhage 2 weeks after surgery, and 50% of these patients had bleeding between postoperative days 20 and 30. In the present study, 64% (16/25) of patients with erosive bleeding and 87.5% (7/8) of patients with nonerosive bleeding had internal bleeding. The fact that 90% (9/10) of all gastrointestinal bleeding patients had intraabdominal erosive factors indicated strong relationships between gastrointestinal hemorrhage and these erosive factors. The bleeding sites were detected in most patients, except for 4 patients who received conservative treatments. For patients with erosive bleeding, the most common bleeding site detected was the pancreatic remnant (43.48%); others included the hepatic artery (39.13%), splenic artery (13.04%), and left gastric artery (4.35%). For patients with nonerosive bleeding, the most common bleeding site was the hepatic artery (83.33%), and the 2nd most frequent site was the splenic artery (16.67%). No hemorrhage from pancreaticojejunal anastomosis occurred in the patients with nonerosive bleeding. Statistical significance was noted between these 2 groups in hemorrhage severity ( P = .012), management strategies ( ...

No abstract

No abstract