The patient's performance of the second walk test with an unchanged distance at a lower heart frequency reveals an improved physical fitness. This is solely described by an increase of the parameter of efficiency, E. Calculation of this parameter delivers a quantification of the effect of exercise training irrespective of the patient's cooperation. Efficiency, hence, is a meaningful complement to the sole consideration of the distance walked in the assessment of physical fitness as a benefit of rehabilitation.

The distances the patients walked in the repeated tests at the entrance and at the end of their clinical rehabilitation were, besides the calculated efficiency, E, significantly increased. However, the increases in distance and efficiency are identical on both occasions, therefore the repetition delivers no further information. The test should be performed without repetitions in clinical routine investigations. The patient's performance in the second walk test with an unchanged distance at a lower heart rate reveals an improved physical fitness. This is solely described by an increase of efficiency, E. Therefore the introduction of E is a suitable measure of the quantified effect of exercise training, even if the patient is not cooperative during the tests. E is proved to be a suitable estimation for the assessment of physical fitness as a benefit of clinical rehabilitation.