Background Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder with considerable clinical heterogeneity. This study aimed to explore the heterogeneity of ASD based on inter-individual heterogeneity of functional brain networks. Methods Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data from the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange database were used in this study for 105 children with ASD and 102 demographically matched typical controls (TC) children. Functional connectivity (FC) networks were first obtained for ASD and TC groups, and inter-individual deviation of functional connectivity (IDFC) from the TC group was then calculated for each individual with ASD. A k-means clustering algorithm was used to obtain ASD subtypes based on IDFC patterns. The FC patterns were further compared between ASD subtypes and the TC group from the brain region, network, and whole-brain levels. The relationship between IDFC and the severity of clinical symptoms of ASD for ASD subtypes was also analyzed using a support vector regression model. Results Two ASD subtypes were identified based on the IDFC patterns. Compared with the TC group, the ASD subtype 1 group exhibited a hypoconnectivity pattern and the ASD subtype 2 group exhibited a hyperconnectivity pattern. IDFC for ASD subtype 1 and subtype 2 was found to predict the severity of social communication impairments and the severity of restricted and repetitive behaviors in ASD, respectively. Limitations Only male children were selected for this study, which limits the ability to study the effects of gender and development on ASD heterogeneity. Conclusions These results suggest the existence of subtypes with different FC patterns in ASD and provide insight into the complex pathophysiological mechanism of clinical manifestations of ASD.

One of the remarkable characteristics of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is the dysregulation of functional connectivity of the triple-network, which includes the salience network (SN), default mode network (DMN), and central executive network (CEN). However, there is little known about the segregation of the triple-network dynamics in ASD. This study used resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data including 105 ASD and 102 demographically-matched typical developing control (TC) children. We compared the dynamic time-varying triple-network segregation and triple-network functional connectivity states between ASD and TC groups, and examined the relationship between dynamic triple-network segregation alterations and clinical symptoms of ASD. The average dynamic network segregation value of the DMN with SN and the DMN with CEN in ASD was lower but the coefficient of variation (CV) of dynamic network segregation of the DMN with CEN was higher in ASD. Furthermore, partially reduced triple-network segregation associated with the DMN was found in connectivity states analysis of ASD. These abnormal average values and CV of dynamic network segregation predicted social communication deficits and restricted and repetitive behaviors in ASD. Our findings indicate abnormal dynamic time-varying triple-network segregation of ASD and highlight the crucial role of the triple-network in the neural mechanisms underlying ASD.

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is characterized by highly structural heterogeneity. However, most previous studies analyzed between-group differences through a structural covariance network constructed based on the ASD group level, ignoring the effect of between-individual differences. We constructed the gray matter volume-based individual differential structural covariance network (IDSCN) using T1-weighted images of 207 children (ASD/healthy controls: 105/102). We analyzed structural heterogeneity of ASD and differences among ASD subtypes obtained by a K-means clustering analysis based on evidently different covariance edges relative to healthy controls. The relationship between the distortion coefficients (DCs) calculated at the whole-brain, intra- and interhemispheric levels and the clinical symptoms of ASD subtypes was then examined. Compared with the control group, ASD showed significantly altered structural covariance edges mainly involved in the frontal and subcortical regions. Given the IDSCN of ASD, we obtained 2 subtypes, and the positive DCs of the 2 ASD subtypes were significantly different. Intra- and interhemispheric positive and negative DCs can predict the severity of repetitive stereotyped behaviors in ASD subtypes 1 and 2, respectively. These findings highlight the crucial role of frontal and subcortical regions in the heterogeneity of ASD and the necessity of studying ASD from the perspective of individual differences.