The problem of natural disasters, such as tsunamis, tends to increase from year to year, mainly due to Indonesia's location in the Pacific Ring of Fire (Ring of Fire) and exacerbated by the lack of tools that can inform early for people if a geological disaster will occur and the lack of early warning for geological disasters installed according to local needs. The tsunami disaster will have a harmful and destructive impact on an area where the community suffers a significant material loss. Therefore, this study aims to determine the priority weight of each region in installing early warning tools to minimize the risk of geological disasters in Indonesia using the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) and Cost-Benefit Analysis methods. This type of research is descriptive exploratory research, using qualitative data analysis methods—classifying regional criteria in Indonesia to determine the installation zone for early detection of natural disasters. The weighting and assessment are carried out on regional factors. Early detection tools for natural disasters are determined using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, which provides subjective calculations based on the hierarchical structure of regional components, namely Dense Settlements, Business Activities, Strategic Buildings Conservation Areas. The subjective calculation is combined with sub-criteria components from the area in coastal settlements, urban settlements, significant business activities, small business activities, important strategic buildings, historical strategic buildings, water conservation areas, and wildlife conservation areas. They support data taken directly through questionnaires and secondary data as comparison data. The data and results of AHP calculations are presented in the form of a parameter table based on the factor component of the regional component. The results of the analysis show that the detectors are divided into four types, namely CBT, Buy, Gauge, and ISDL

No abstract

This study aims to provide an understanding of the role of Civil-Military Collaborative Governance in disaster management in Aceh in 2004. This study used a qualitative research method with a case study approach. Data analysis in this study used descriptive-deductive techniques, besides that, the type of data used in this study was secondary data. Thus, the researcher conducted a search of the data contained in organizational reports and scientific articles. The results of this study show that Civil-Military Collaborative Governance in disaster management in Aceh in 2004 played a role as a defense diplomacy strategy for the Government of Indonesia.

No abstract

By understanding that disasters are everyone's business, disasters are not only a civil matter, but the involvement of the military is necessary. Civil-military collaboration has proven capable of speeding up disaster management so that the number of victims and damage can be minimized. MOOTW (Military Operations Other Than War) can be carried out in harmony with social, technological and knowledge changes in society and provide cooperative assistance in disaster management. The aim of this study is to conduct an analysis and elaborate on the importance of Collaborative Governance in strengthening defense policies in disaster management. Qualitative methods are used in this research. The interpretation of the data becomes the basis for the analysis that comes from a series of interviews and based on literature studies. Collection of previous reference journals, books, and news from internet sources, all of which are used as secondary data. Conclusion of this study, Collaborative Governance in efforts to deal with natural disasters has been relatively good. However, several obstacles were found and it is hoped that this can be used as evaluation material for the future.