Tumor‐infiltrating immune cells play a crucial role in tumor progression and response to treatment. However, the limited studies on infiltrating immune cells have shown inconsistent and even controversial results for osteosarcoma (OS). In addition, the dynamic changes of infiltrating immune cells after neoadjuvant chemotherapy are largely unknown. We downloaded the RNA expression matrix and clinical information of 80 OS patients from the TARGET database. CIBERSORT was used to evaluate the proportion of 22 immune cell types in patients based on gene expression data. M2 macrophages were found to be the most abundant immune cell type and were associated with improved survival in OS. Another cohort of pretreated OS samples was evaluated by immunohistochemistry to validate the results from CIBERSORT analysis. Matched biopsy and surgical samples from 27 patients were collected to investigate the dynamic change of immune cells and factors before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with increased densities of CD3+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, Ki67 + CD8+ T cells and PD‐L1+ immune cells. Moreover, HLA‐DR‐CD33+ myeloid‐derived suppressive cells (MDSC) were decreased after treatment. We determined that the application of chemotherapy may activate the local immune status and convert OS into an immune “hot” tumor. These findings provide rationale for investigating the schedule of immunotherapy treatment in OS patients in future clinical trials.

Background: Osteosarcoma (OSA), the most common primary bone malignancy in children and adolescents, is prone to metastases and unfavorable prognosis. Owing to its strong genomic heterogeneity, traditional chemotherapy, or targeted immunotherapy has not effectively improved the related overall survival for decades. Since the landscape of the OSA tumor immune microenvironment is scarcely known, despite it playing a crucial role in predicting clinical outcomes and therapeutic efficacies, we aimed to elucidate its molecular characteristics. Methods: The immune signature of 101 OSA samples was explored using transcriptome profiling and clinical characteristics retrieved from the Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (TARGET) program. Correlations between the prognostic immune markers and their clinical chemotherapy responses were assessed and verified based on 45 OSA primary tumors. Findings: We identified the heterogeneity underlying tumor immune signature in OSA, and found CD4+ T cells and macrophage markers CD4/IFNGR2/CD68 to be feasible prognostic factors, exerting significantly positive correlation with each other. Specifically, CSF1R, which plays an essential role in the regulation of proliferation and differentiation of macrophages, was found to be a specific signature associated with CD4/CD68, with improved OSA clinical outcomes. Interpretation: The immune landscape based on CD4/CD68/CSF1R gene signatures showed considerable promise for prognostic and therapeutic stratification in OSA patients. A specific immune signature for OSA, abundantly consisting of Th1-polarized CD4+ T cells and CSF1R-related CD68+ macrophages, may improve the predictive efficacy of chemotherapy and improve prognosis in patients with OSA.

Study Design. A retrospective study was conducted. Objective. This study aims to compare the perioperative outcomes of minimal invasive spine surgery (MISS) and traditional open surgery (TOS) for thoracolumbar spine metastasis. Summary of Background Data. TOS for metastatic spinal tumors has many disadvantages, such as significant blood loss and high complication rate. MISS may change the treatment modality, but its safety and efficacy for spinal metastasis are lacking. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed clinical data from 154 consecutive patients registered in our institute who underwent separation surgery for spinal metastases from January 2017 to December 2019. Forty-nine patients received MISS and 105 patients had TOS. The demographic and perioperative data were collected and compared between two approaches. Results. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the MISS and TOS group, except the sex (P = 0.04). The mean intraoperative blood loss in MISS group was lower than that in TOS group (748.57 vs. 950.48 mL, P = 0.039). The operative time was comparable between both groups (mean 213.45 vs. 221.03 minutes, P = 0.78). The postoperative drainage before discharge in MISS group was remarkably less than that in TOS group (mean 494.02 vs. 1099.10 mL, P = 0.0004). As compared to TOS group, patients in MISS group had lower complication rate, although the difference is not significant (9.52% vs. 6.12%, P = 0.55). The infection rate of MISS group was two-fold lower than that in the TOS group, although the difference is not significant (P = 0.43). The mean hospital stay of MISS group is 7.35 days, which is significantly shorter than TOS group (9.94 days, P = 0.0007). Patients in both groups exhibited similar postoperative neurological outcomes. Conclusion. MISS is a safe and effective technique that could be considered the optimal treatment for patients with spinal metastasis and myelopathy and thus is an excellent alternative in managing thoracolumbar spine metastasis. Level of Evidence: 3

Osteosarcoma (OSA) is the most common bone malignancy and displays high heterogeneity of molecular phenotypes. This study aimed to characterize the molecular features of OSA by developing a classification system based on the gene expression profile of the tumor microenvironment. Integrative analysis was performed using specimens and clinical information for OSA patients from the TARGET program. Using a matrix factorization method, we identified two molecular subtypes significantly associated with prognosis, S1 (infiltration type) and S2 (escape type). Both subtypes displayed unique features of functional significance features and cellular infiltration characteristics. We determined that immune and stromal infiltrates were abundant in subtype S1 compare to that in subtype S2. Furthermore, higher expression of immune checkpoint PDCD1LG2 and HAVCR2 was associated with improved prognosis, while a preferable chemotherapeutic response was associated with FAP-positive fibroblasts in subtype S1. Alternatively, subtype S2 is characterized by a lack of effective cytotoxic responses and loss of major histocompatibility complex class I molecule expression. A gene classifier was ultimately generated to enable OSA classification and the results were confirmed using the GSE21257 validation set. Correlations between the percentage of fibroblasts and/or fibrosis and CD8+ cells, and their clinical responses to chemotherapy were assessed and verified based on 47 OSA primary tumors. This study established a new OSA classification system for stratifying OSA patient risk, thereby further defining the genetic diversity of OSA and allowing for improved efficiency of personalized therapy.

Tumor microenvironments are strongly related to tumor development, and immune-infiltrating cells and immune-related molecules are potential prognostic markers. However, the shortcomings of traditional measurement methods limit the accurate evaluation of various components in tumor microenvironments. With the rapid advancement of Next-Generation RNA Sequencing technology, dedicated and in-depth analyses of immune filtration within the tumor microenvironment has been achieved. In this study, we combined the bioinformatics analysis methods ESTIMATE, CIBERSORT, and ssGSEA to characterize the immune infiltration of sarcomas and to identify specific immunomodulators of different pathological subtypes. We further extracted a functional enrichment of significant immune-related genes related to improved prognosis, including NR1H3, VAMP5, GIMAP2, GBP2, HLA-E and CRIP1. Overall, the immune microenvironment is an important prognostic determinant of sarcomas and may be a potential resource for developing effective immunotherapy.