The ear-EEG has emerged as a promising candidate for real-world wearable brain monitoring. While experimental studies have validated several applications of ear-EEG, the source-sensor relationship for neural sources from across the brain surface has not yet been established. In addition, modeling of the ear-EEG sensitivity to sources of artifacts is still missing. Through volume conductor modeling, the sensitivity of various configurations of ear-EEG is established for a range of neural sources, in addition to ocular artifact sources for the blink, vertical saccade, and horizontal saccade eye movements. Results conclusively support the introduction of ear-EEG into conventional EEG paradigms for monitoring neural activity that originates from within the temporal lobes, while also revealing the extent to which ear-EEG can be used for sources further away from these regions. The use of ear-EEG in scenarios prone to ocular artifacts is also supported, through the demonstration of proportional scaling of artifacts and neural signals in various configurations of ear-EEG. The results from this study can be used to support both existing and prospective experimental ear-EEG studies and applications in the context of sensitivity to both neural sources and ocular artifacts.
The Ear-ECG provides a continuous Lead I electrocardiogram (ECG) by measuring the potential difference related to heart activity through the use of electrodes that can be embedded within earphones. The significant increase in wearability and comfort afforded by Ear-ECG is often accompanied by a corresponding degradation in signal quality -a common obstacle that is shared by the majority of wearable technologies. We aim to resolve this issue by introducing a Deep Matched Filter (Deep-MF) for the highly accurate detection of R-peaks in wearable ECG, thus enhancing the utility of Ear-ECG in real-world scenarios. The Deep-MF consists of an encoder stage (trained as part of an encoder-decoder module to reproduce ground truth ECG), and an R-peak classifier stage. Through its operation as a Matched Filter, the encoder section searches for matches with an ECG template pattern in the input signal, prior to filtering the matches with the subsequent convolutional layers and selecting peaks corresponding to true ECG matches. The so condensed latent representation of R-peak information is then fed into a simple R-peak classifier, of which the output provides precise R-peak locations. The proposed Deep Matched Filter is evaluated using leave-one-subject-out cross validation over 36 subjects with an age range of 18-75, with the Deep-MF outperforming existing algorithms for R-peak detection in noisy ECG. The proposed Deep-MF is bench marked against a ground truth ECG in the form of either chest-ECG or arm-ECG, and both R-peak recall and R-peak precision is calculated. The Deep-MF achieves a median R-peak recall of 94.9% and a median precision of 91.2% across subjects when evaluated with leave-one-subject-out cross validation. Moreover, when evaluated across a range of thresholds, the Deep-MF achieves an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.97. The interpretability of Deep-MF as a Matched Filter is further strengthened by the analysis of its response to partial initialisation with an ECG template. We demonstrate that the Deep Matched Filter algorithm not only retains the initialised ECG kernel structure during the training process, but also amplifies portions of the ECG which it deems most valuable -namely the P wave, and each aspect of the QRS complex. Overall, the Deep Matched Filter serves as a valuable step forward for the real-world functionality of Ear-ECG and, through its explainable operation, the acceptance of deep learning models in e-health.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.