Background Congenital anomalies are the fifth leading cause of mortality in children younger than 5 years globally. Many gastrointestinal congenital anomalies are fatal without timely access to neonatal surgical care, but few studies have been done on these conditions in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We compared outcomes of the seven most common gastrointestinal congenital anomalies in low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries globally, and identified factors associated with mortality. MethodsWe did a multicentre, international prospective cohort study of patients younger than 16 years, presenting to hospital for the first time with oesophageal atresia, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, intestinal atresia, gastroschisis, exomphalos, anorectal malformation, and Hirschsprung's disease. Recruitment was of consecutive patients for a minimum of 1 month between October, 2018, and April, 2019. We collected data on patient demographics, clinical status, interventions, and outcomes using the REDCap platform. Patients were followed up for 30 days after primary intervention, or 30 days after admission if they did not receive an intervention. The primary outcome was all-cause, in-hospital mortality for all conditions combined and each condition individually, stratified by country income status. We did a complete case analysis. FindingsWe included 3849 patients with 3975 study conditions (560 with oesophageal atresia, 448 with congenital diaphragmatic hernia, 681 with intestinal atresia, 453 with gastroschisis, 325 with exomphalos, 991 with anorectal malformation, and 517 with Hirschsprung's disease) from 264 hospitals (89 in high-income countries, 166 in middleincome countries, and nine in low-income countries) in 74 countries. Of the 3849 patients, 2231 (58•0%) were male. Median gestational age at birth was 38 weeks (IQR 36-39) and median bodyweight at presentation was 2•8 kg (2•3-3•3). Mortality among all patients was 37 (39•8%) of 93 in low-income countries, 583 (20•4%) of 2860 in middle-income countries, and 50 (5•6%) of 896 in high-income countries (p<0•0001 between all country income groups). Gastroschisis had the greatest difference in mortality between country income strata (nine [90•0%] of ten in lowincome countries, 97 [31•9%] of 304 in middle-income countries, and two [1•4%] of 139 in high-income countries; p≤0•0001 between all country income groups). Factors significantly associated with higher mortality for all patients combined included country income status (low-income vs high-income countries, risk ratio 2•78 [95% CI 1•88-4•11], p<0•0001; middle-income vs high-income countries, 2•11 [1•59-2•79], p<0•0001), sepsis at presentation (1•20 [1•04-1•40], p=0•016), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score at primary intervention (ASA 4-5 vs ASA 1-2, 1•82 [1•40-2•35], p<0•0001; ASA 3 vs ASA 1-2, 1•58, [1•30-1•92], p<0•0001]), surgical safety checklist not used (1•39 [1•02-1•90], p=0•035), and ventilation or parenteral nutrition unavailable when needed (ventilation 1•96, [1•4...
Background: Coronavirus (COVID-19) is the newest pandemic disease. The surgical management of acute appendicitis was the gold standard, but new studies suggest the safety of antibiotics treatment alone. NOTA avoid surgery, risks of general anesthesia; long hospital stay and risk of corona virus exposure. We aim to study the safety, cost effectiveness and outcome of NOTA during Covid-19 pandemic and compare it to Single incision pediatric endo-surgery appendectomy (SIPESA) Methods A prospective cohort study for NOTA of patients from 6–12 years old in Covid-19 pandemic period from 1st April 2020 to 30th April 2021. Patients divided in 2 groups: Group S managed by SIPESA; group N managed by NOTA. Family education and assurance with detailed explanation was done for early detection of any complication and we continue monitoring of the patients until complete recovery. Results sixty patients were managed. Group S had 24 cases (40%), mean age 9.3 years. Group N had 36 cases (60%), mean age 9.1 years. six cases (17%) in group N were converted to surgical management in first 6 month of study. Mean length of hospital stay dropped from 72 hours to 18 hours. The mean cost dropped from 2736$/day to 400$/day. Mean psychological stress for the children improved from 4.4 in April to 2 in September. Mean follow up was 3.5 months. Conclusions NOTA is safe and cost-effective. we recommend it especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Level of evidence: Cost Effectiveness Study: Level II
Background: Early repair of Anorectal malformation (ARM) within 6 months may be one of the factors that improve fecal continence. Delayed and multiple-stage repairs require dilatation, strict bowel preparation, fasting and total parenteral nutrition (TPN). PNPSARP requires neither bowel preparation nor parenteral nutrition. We believe it can be achieved within 72 hours of life.Aim: To evaluate the safety, feasibility and cost effectiveness of PNPSARP within 72 hours of life versus delayed or multiple-stage repair of vestibular and perineal fistula. Material & Methods: A retrospective study was carried out of all newborns with ARM at our institute between August 2016 and August 2019. PNPSARP within 72 hours of life was compared with delayed or multiple-stage repair. Neither bowel preparation nor parenteral nutrition was required in the PNPSRP group. Perioperative complications and costs were evaluated. Results: Eight PNPSARP were compared with 7 delayed or multiple stage repair over the study period. Four babies (50%) were operated at day 1 post delivery in the PNPSARP group. Mean operative time (MOT) was 109 minutes (68-155). Mean follow up period was 22 months (12-36). One girl with a vestibular fistula had wound infection. This group had a good outcome with no morbidity, high satisfaction rate and low costs in comparison to delayed or multiple-stage repair.Conclusions: PNPSARP for perineal and vestibular fistula with supportive ancillary services in the first few days of life appears to be safe and cost effective with minimal morbidity. PNPSARP is now the standard technique in our unit.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.