PurposeTo identify the risk factors for, and clinical features and treatment outcomes of aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity (APROP) in Korean infants.MethodsAmong 770 premature infants who underwent screening, 105 infants (198 eyes, 13.63%) received treatment for ROP. A total of 24 infants (48 eyes, 3.12%) developed APROP while 81 infants (150 eyes, 10.52%) developed non-APROP treatment-requiring type. The medical records of ROP-treated infants were reviewed retrospectively. The associated systemic and maternal risk factors were analyzed and anatomical outcomes were compared according to the severity of ROP and treatment modalities.ResultsThe mean gestational age and birth weight at birth in the APROP group were significantly lower than those in the non-APROP group (P=0.019, P<0.001, respectively). Infants who were born small for their GA developed APROP more frequently than non-APROP patients (P<0.001). Chorioamnionitis-positive infants also showed higher incidence rate of APROP (APROP vs non-APROP; P<0.001 and zone I APROP vs posterior zone II APROP; P=0.036, respectively). Infants with APROP required heavier laser treatment with a higher retreatment rate compared to infants with non-APROP. Favorable anatomical outcomes were achieved in 95.3% from treatment-requiring non-APROP group, 85.7% from zone I APROP and 84.6% from posterior zone II APROP group.ConclusionIntrauterine growth restriction and chorioamnionitis were associated with development of APROP. These findings suggest that perinatal maternal environment inhibiting normal retinal vascular growth in utero may contribute to increasing the risk of APROP in premature infants.

Background To analyse structural characteristics and perifoveal/peripapillary vasculature by OCT in children with peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS) and compare the results with those of normal subjects. Methods Forty-five patients (84 eyes) under 18 years old with blurry disc margin were evaluated with spectral domain-OCT and swept course-OCT. Patients were divided into four groups, according to presence of PHOMS and then the size of the existing PHOMS. Eyes with visible optic disc drusen (ODD) were not included. Foveal avascular zone (FAZ) and vessel densities from macula and optic disc area were assessed and potential associations between vessel density and structural parameters, such as peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (pRNFL), and macular ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL) thickness, were analysed. Results Among 45 patients (eighty-four eyes), coexisting buried ODD were found only in eyes with PHOMS. The scleral canal diameter was significantly smaller in PHOMS positive eyes compared to control eyes. Vessel density measurements from the papillary, peripapillary and optic nerve head (ONH) regions in the large PHOMS group were significantly lower compared to the control group (papillary; P = 0.014, peripapillary; P = 0.001, ONH; P = 0.046). FAZ area and macular vessel densities showed no difference compared to normal eyes in all three PHOMS groups. pRNFL and mGCIPL thickness did not differ among four groups and correlations were also not significant. Conclusions Children with PHOMS have smaller scleral canal and can entail buried ODD. Vessel densities of optic disc area in large PHOMS eyes are significantly lower than in normal eyes.

ABSTRACT.Purpose: To compare the macular thickness and volume change, and inflammatory cytokine levels after cataract surgery performed using two different sizes of incision (microincision versus small incision). Methods: In this randomized, comparative clinical trial, 84 eyes with nuclear density from Grade 3-4 were randomly divided into two groups (microincision, 2.2 mm; and small incision, 2.75 mm). Forty-two patients underwent phacoemulsification with microincision coaxial cataract surgery and 42 patients underwent phacoemulsification with small incision coaxial cataract surgery. Clinical measurements included preoperative, 1-week, 1-month and 2-month postoperative best corrected visual acuity, central corneal thickness (CCT) and endothelial cell count. ELISA and RT-PCR were performed for IL-1b, IL-6, VEGF and PGE2 preoperatively and at 1 week postoperatively. Results: The percentage increase in CCT in the microincision group was significantly higher than that in the small incision group at 1 week after cataract surgery (p = 0.01). The increase in macular thickness in the microincision group was significantly higher than that in small incision group at 1 month after cataract operation (p = 0.04). Also, IL-1b, IL-6, VEGF and PGE2 concentrations and their expression ratio in the microincision group were significantly higher than those in the small incision group at 1 week after cataract surgery compared to the preoperative period (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Phacoemulsification with microincision coaxial cataract surgery may increase the macular thickness compared to phacoemulsification with small incision coaxial cataract surgery. Blood-aqueous barrier breakdown may occur more frequently after microincision cataract surgery than after small incision cataract surgery.