Objective:Organizing pneumonia (OP) is a rare lung condition that is characterized by the presence of polypoid tissues due to fibroblastic plugs within respiratory bronchioles, alveolar ducts and sacs. The three main radiologic patterns of OP include typical, solitary-focal and infiltrative forms. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) may be high in benign conditions such as OP as well as malignant diseases. The aim of our study was to investigate PET-CT characteristics of OP in patients mimicking lung cancer.Methods:The clinical and radiologic characteristics of 50 patients who were referred to our hospital for PET/CT evaluation due to suspicion of lung malignancy, and who were pathologically diagnosed as OP between 2009 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed.Results:The mean age of the patients was 58.2 years. Ninety-six percent of patients (48) were male. Radiologic evaluation revealed 27 (54%) focal involvement, 10 (20%) consolidation with air-bronchogram (typical), 1 (2%) infiltrative and 12 (24%) other types of involvement (multiple nodules and cavitary lesions). The mean SUVmax value of the lesions on PET/CT was calculated as 6.5. Mediastinal lymph node involvement (at least one station) was detected in 76% of our study group with a mean SUVmax value of 3.27.Conclusion:OP may cause false positive results on PET/CT. However, PET/CT results may be used as a guide for invasive procedures that should be performed when there is suspicion of malignancy.
Both cervical stability training and its combination with core stability training were significantly and similarly effective on neck pain and neck muscle endurance in patients with cervical disc herniation.
Retrospective evaluation of patients with organizing pneumonia: is cryptogenic organizing pneumonia different from secondary organizing pneumonia? Introduction: Organizing pneumonia (OP) is an uncommon clinic opathological situation among lung diseases. If no underlying cause can be detected, it is named as cryptogenic OP (COP). In this study, the etiologic and clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed as OP in our hospital in the last ten years were evaluated retrospectively. It was also aimed to make a comparison between COP and secondary OP patients. Materials and Methods:One hundred sixty-five patients diagnosed as OP pathologically in the 10 year period from August 2003 to August 2013 were included into that study. Patients' data were evaluated retrospectively from the medical records. Results:One hundred sixty five patients pathologically diagnosed as OP were included. Diagnostic methods were trans-thoracic fine-needle biopsy (TTFNB) in 89 (53.9%) patients, open lung biopsy (lobectomy, wedge resection, segmentectomy) in 52 (31.5%) patients and transbronchial biyopsy (TBB) in 24 (14.5%) patients. One hundred (60.6%) of the patients were defined as COP and 65 (39.4%) as secondary OP. Cough, fatigue and dyspnea were the most common symptoms on admission. We detected OP cases secondary to anthracosis and cyst hydatic besides other well known etiologies. In 61 patients, the main radiologic manifestation was multiple bilateral patchy consolidation typical for OP. In 76 patients focal lesions (solid mass, cavitating mass lesion) and in 6 patients infiltrative opacities were detected radiologically.Retrospective evaluation of patients with organizing pneumonia: is cryptogenic organizing pneumonia different from secondary organizing pneumonia? Conclusion: There is no difference between properties of OP from clinical, laboratory and radiologic finding sin the criptogenic and seconder form of OP. Although it is not asserted, cyst hidatic and anthracosis could be kept in mind for the list of underlying ethiologies for secondary OP.Bulgular: Çalışmaya patolojik olarak OP tanısı konulmuş 165 hasta dahil edildi. Hastaların 89 (%53.9)'una transtorasik ince iğne aspirasyon biyopsisi (TTİAB), 52 (%31.5)'sine cerrahi yöntemle (lobektomi, wedge rezeksiyon, segmentektomi), 24 (%14.5)' üne transbronşiyal biyopsi (TBB) ile tanı konulmuştu. 100 (%60.6) hastanın KOP, 65 (%39.4) hastanın da sekonder OP olduğu belirlendi. En yaygın görülen semptomlar; öksürük, halsizlik, dispne idi. Elli beş (%44.7) hastada restriktif, 26 (%21.2) hastada obstrüktif solunum fonksiyon bozukluğuna rastlandı. Çalışmamızda sekonder organize pnömoniye sebep olan bilinen etyolojik ajanlara ek olarak antrokozise ve kist hidatiğe bağlı olarak gelişen organize pnömoni olguları saptadık. Altmış dokuz hastada OP'un tipik radyolojik görünümü olan yamalı vasıfta bilateral multipl opasiteler, 76 hastada fokal lezyonlar (solid kitle, kaviter kitle), 6 hastada da infiltratif opasiteler izlendi. Sonuç: OP'un kriptojenik ve sekonder formlarında OP'a ilişkin klini...
Patients with nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) may face motor control problems and health disability barriers during various tasks. However, studies investigating the extent of these disadvantages, and possible associated factors are quite limited in patients with NSLBP. To compare motor control performances and physical assessment domains between patients with NSLBP and asymptomatic controls. Twentyseven patients with NSBLP and 27 age-and sex-matched asymptomatic controls participated in this cross-sectional study. Ultrasonographic imaging was used to determine abdominal and multifidus muscles thicknesses and adipose tissue rate. Visual analog scale was used to assess LBP severity. Body mass index (BMI) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores of the participants were physical assessment domains of LBP. BMI values were greater in the NSLBP group compared to the asymptomatic participants. ANCOVA revealed a significant interaction effect regarding external abdominal oblique and multifidus lumborum muscles thickness, and abdominal adipose tissue (p = 0.015; p = 0.001; p = 0.006), respectively in terms of two groups.The thicknesses of these muscles were lesser in the NSLBP group compared with the control group. Similarly, abdominal adipose tissue was higher in the NSLBP group.The stepwise multiple regression analysis demonstrated that the Oswestry Disability Index and abdominal adipose tissue rate were significant and independent factors of the low back pain severity with 73.5% of the variance. The study results indicate that increased disability and fat infiltration are possible determinants influencing pain severity, although further research is required. Examining musculoskeletal properties of lumbar region could provide information about the limitation in patients with NSBLP.
Bu çalışmada COVID-19 tanısı alan hastaların toraks bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT) sonuçlarını inceleyip, tipik ve atipik bulguları literatür eşliğinde sunmayı amaçladık.Araçlar ve Yöntem: Hastanemize mart ve nisan aylarında başvuran ve reverse transkriptaz-polimeraz zincir reaksiyonu (RT-PZR) ile COVID-19 tanısı alan hastaların toraks BT'leri retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Akciğer parankim bulgularından buzlu cam sahaları, konsolidasyon, vasküler genişleme, fibrozis, nodül, septal kalınlaşma (crazy paving), ters halo, plevral effüzyon ve mediastinal LAP bulguları araştırıldı. Parankimdeki tutulum yerine göre bilateral-unilateral, periferik-santral, üst-orta-alt loblardaki odak sayılarına göre lezyonların dağılımı değerlendirildi.Bulgular: PCR pozitif olan 53 hastanın (ortalama yaş 48,38±20,97) 14'ünde (% 26) toraks BT'de bulgu yoktu. BT'de bulgusu olan 39 hastada (%74), tipik bulgulardan buzlu cam sahası (%85), konsolidasyon (%56), buzlu cam ve konsolidasyon birlikteliği (%59), vasküler genişleme (%28) izlendi. Atipik bulgulardan nodül (%20), septal kalınlaşma (%30), fibrozis (%10), plevral efüzyon (%8), hava bronkogramı (%18), ters halo bulgusu (%5) saptandı. Hastalarımızda mediastinal LAP saptanmadı. Toraks BT'de bilateral, orta ve alt zonlarda periferik yerleşimli multifokal odaklar tipik tutulum şekliydi. 14 hastada toraks BT negatif olup herhangi bir bulguya rastlanmadı.Sonuç: Toraks BT, COVID-19 hastaları için tanıya yardımcı çok önemli bir yöntem olup parankim tutulumunun tipik ve atipik bulgular şeklinde kategorize edilerek değerlendirilmesi tanı sürecini kolaylaştırabilir.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.