No abstract

The popularity of supermicrosurgery has increased dramatically over the past few years, but the lack of agreement regarding the name of the technique and its applications has caused misunderstandings among microsurgeons when trying to communicate and compare surgical procedures. We report the consensus reached on the name used to refer to supermicrosurgery techniques following the First European Conference on Supramicrosurgery held in Barcelona (Spain) on March 4-5, 2010. Present applications, advantages, and disadvantages of supermicrosurgery are discussed. It was agreed that supermicrosurgery was the most accurate name to reflect the essence of this extremely delicate technique. According to Koshima, supermicrosurgery is a technique of microneurovascular anastomosis for vessels of 0.3 to 0.8 mm and single nerve fascicles. The range of applications for this technique has increased rapidly and now includes lymphedema treatment, nerve reconstruction, replantation and reconstruction of amputated fingertips, microsurgical flap salvage, and new possibilities for free tissue transfer. Supermicrosurgery is a remarkably useful reconstructive tool that involves a great deal of skill and has a steep learning curve for the microsurgeon to master. Although it is currently performed by only a minority of microsurgeons, we consider it will be incorporated into conventional microsurgery in the near future.

ALT perforator flap is a precious option for lower extremity soft tissue reconstruction with minimal donor site morbidity. Nevertheless, the beginners should be attentive to an increased rate of flap complications with the ALT flap and free axial muscle-musculocutaneous flaps would still be the tissue of choice for coverage of leg defects for a surgeon before gaining enough experience with perforator flap dissection.

Recent supermicrosurgical techniques have developed the possibility for vascular anastomosis of smaller vessels and it is now safe and sound to perform precise anastomoses between lymphatics and venules. Reported here is the 2 years experience on supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis and/or lymphaticovenous implantation combined with a nonoperative physical therapy for treatment of lower extremity lymphedema. Microlymphatic surgery was performed in 42 patients with unilateral lower extremity lymphedema. Thirty patients were women and 12 were men with a mean age of 34. Lymphaticovenular anastomoses were performed in 37 patients with an average of 2.5 anastomoses per patient, and lymphaticovenous implantations were made in 36 patients with an average of 2.4 implantations per patient. The lymphatics that were larger than 0.3 mm were anastomosed to venules with supermicrosurgical technique. Lymphaticovenous implantation technique was used for thinner lymphatics in a particular incision. Postoperatively, 18 patients used continuous compressive garments, 9 patients used garments but discontinued after 6 months, and no compression was used in 9 patients. The results of surgery were assessed both clinically with volume measurements and by lymphoscintigraphy and were classified as good, moderate, or ineffective. The mean decrease in the volume of the edema was 59.3% at an average follow-up of 11.8 months. Six outcomes were classified as ineffective, eight outcomes as moderate, and 28 outcomes as good. Supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis and/or lymphaticovenous implantation seems to be highly beneficial, especially in the early stages of peripheral lymphedema and may be offered as the treatment of choice in selected patients.

Although some authors previously stated that microlymphatic surgery does not have application to primary lymphedema, opposite views are reported based on the observations that the lymphatics were not hypoplastic in majority of these patients and microlymphatic surgery yielded significant improvement. The aim of this study was to compare the intraoperative findings and outcomes of primary and secondary lower-extremity lymphedema cases treated with lymphaticovenous shunts. Between December 2006 and April 2009, microlymphatic surgery was performed in 80 lower extremities with primary and 21 with secondary lymphedema. These two groups of extremities are compared according to the morphology of the lymphatic vessels and possibility of precise anastomoses, their response to the treatment, and final outcomes based on volumetric measurements during the follow-up period. The morphology of the lymphatics in secondary lymphedema was more consistent, and at least one collector larger than 0.3 mm was available for anastomosis in 20 of 21 extremities. In the primary lymphedema group, the lymphatics were smaller than 0.3 mm in 13 of 80 extremities. It was, therefore, possible to perform supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenous anastomosis in 84% of extremities with primary lymphedema and 95% of extremities with secondary lymphedema. Reduction of the edema occurred earlier in the secondary lymphedema group, but the mean reduction in the edema volume was comparable between the two groups. Microlymphatic surgery, although more effective and offered as the treatment of choice for secondary lymphedema, would also be a valuable and relevant treatment of primary lymphedema.