This study aims to determine the profile of students' literacy skills in one of the private high schools in Karanganyar. This study uses a survey method. The study population was all high school students of class X, XI, and XII MIA. The sampling technique uses stratified proportional random sampling with a total sample of 45 students. Science literacy skills are measured using the 2015 Program for International Student (PISA) test with indicators developed by Gormally. The results showed that in general, the average value of students' scientific literacy skills was 52.22% in the deficient category. The results of each indicator of scientific literacy skills are as follows: (1) scientific opinion identification skills of 55.56% in the low category, (2) effective literature search of 48.89% in the very low category, (3) understanding the research design elements amounted to 37.78% in the very low category, (4) charted 57.78% in the low category, (5) solved the problem with quantitative skills of 53.33% in the very low category, (6) interpreted the statistics the base is 60.00% in the medium category, (7) inference, prediction and conclusion drawing 62.23% in the medium category.
<p>Pada era Pendidikan 4.0, siswa bertanggung jawab untuk menentukan jalur pendidikan mereka sendiri yang juga mengarah pada konsep pembelajaran yang dipersonalisasi. Education 4.0 juga memperkenalkan learning analytics (LA). Society 5.0 sebagai ide perintis diharapkan mampu menyelesaikan persoalan ini, perlu banyak pengembangan terutama dalam hal teknologi untuk “mengangkat” masyarakat era kelima ini. Untuk melakukan revolusi besar-besaran, diperlukan modal yang cukup kuat. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui profil kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kreatif siswa terhadap revolusi industri 4.0 dan masyarakat 5.0. Subjek penelitian ini adalah siswa SMA dengan jumlah 47 siswa. Subjek dipilih dengan teknik random sampling di salah satu SMA di Solo Raya. Responden diwajibkan untuk mengisi kuisioner yang diberikan. Data diperoleh dengan menggunakan kuesioner yang terdiri dari 33 pertanyaan. Berdasarkan pengolahan data yang telah dilakukan menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan berpikir kritis dan berpikir kreatif siswa masih perlu ditingkatkan. Kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa berada pada kategori sedang, sedangkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa berada pada kategori rendah.</p><p> </p><p><em><strong>Profile of high school students' critical and creative thinking ability to industrial revolution 4.0 and society 5.0. </strong>Education 4.0, students are responsible for determining their own educational path which also leads to the concept of personalized learning. Education 4.0 also introduced learning analytics (LA). Society 5.0 as a pioneering idea hoped to be able to resolve this issue, it needs a lot of developments, especially in terms of technology to "pick up" this fifth era of society. In order to carry out a large-scale revolution, it is necessary to have sufficiently strong capital. The purpose of this study was to determine the profile of students' critical and creative thinking skills towards the industrial revolution 4.0 and society 5.0. The subjects of this study were high school students with a total of 47 students. Subjects were selected using a random sampling technique in a high school in Solo Raya. Respondents are required to fill out a questionnaire given. The data obtained by using a questionnaire consisting of 33 questions. Based on the data processing that has been done, it shows that students' critical thinking and creative thinking skills still need to be improved. Students 'critical thinking skills are in the medium category, while students' creative thinking skills are in the low category.</em></p>
<span lang="IN">The concept of disease is taught at every level of education in Indonesia, but we found some discontinuity. Disjointed and not mutually sustainable concepts cause students’ understanding to be suboptimal. One example of a sustainable concept was the learning progression (L</span><span lang="EN-US">ea</span><span lang="IN">P) about the concept of disease proposed by the National Research Council (NRC). This study was aimed to test and find out: 1) The validity of the L</span><span lang="EN-US">ea</span><span lang="IN">P instrument about the concept of disease, 2) The grades </span><span lang="EN-US">7<sup>th</sup></span><span lang="IN"> and </span><span lang="EN-US">8<sup>th</sup> </span><span lang="IN">students’ understanding towards the concept of disease. 296 students of grades </span><span lang="EN-US">7<sup>th</sup></span><span lang="IN"> and </span><span lang="EN-US">8<sup>th</sup> </span><span lang="IN">from four public </span><span lang="EN-US">middle</span><span lang="IN"> schools in Surakarta were selected as the samples. The school samples were selected purposively, while the students and classes were selected based on the recommendation by the teacher. The ex post facto quantitative non-experimental was used as the research method. The instrument was produced according to the L</span><span lang="EN-US">ea</span><span lang="IN">P scheme proposed by NRC (2007). The instrument was an Ordered Multiple Choice (OMC) test with multiple choice levels. Data were collected using tests, interviews, and documentation. The results showed: 1) The instrument items was valid with very high reliability, 2). The instrument difficulty level and distinguishing power need to be improved, 3) Grades </span><span lang="EN-US">7<sup>th</sup></span><span lang="IN"> and </span><span lang="EN-US">8<sup>th</sup> </span><span lang="IN">students who have level 3 understanding were ranged </span><span lang="IN">from 37% to 39.62%.</span>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.