ObjectiveA number of patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer have not yet given birth when they relapse after achieving complete response with initial fertility-preserving treatment. Often such patients still have a strong desire for fertility preservation; however, there are limited reports in the related literature on the efficacy of fertility-preserving retreatment in patients with relapse. This study intends to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fertility-preserving retreatment in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer after recurrence following initial fertility-preserving treatment.MethodsData from 110 patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer who received fertility-preserving treatment in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital (December 2005 to September 2019) were collected, and a retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical characteristics, histopathology results, and outcomes of 25 patients with recurrence.Results25 patients (9 with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and 16 with endometrial cancer) received fertility-preserving retreatment. After a median treatment duration of 5 months (range 3–18), 21 patients (84%, 21/25) achieved complete response and 4 patients (16%, 4/25) had a partial response. The median follow-up time was 19.5 months (range 8–76), and a total of 8 patients (38.1%, 8/21) relapsed. The time from retreatment to complete response for endometrial cancer was significantly longer than that for atypical endometrial hyperplasia (7.5 vs 3 months; p=0.007). Among the 21 patients who achieved complete response, 12 patients had a desire for fertility, among whom 8 patients had a successful pregnancy (66.7%, 8/12) and 6 patients experienced term birth (1 patient with natural pregnancy and 5 patients with assisted reproductive technology). Six patients (50%, 6/12) delivered 6 full-term babies.ConclusionThe response rate is high and obstetrical outcomes are favorable after fertility-preserving retreatment in patients with recurrence of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer.

Diabetes is closely related to the occurrence of endometrial cancer (EC) and its poor prognosis. However, there is no effective clinical treatment for EC patients with diabetes (patientEC+/dia+). To explore new therapeutic targets, Ishikawa is cultured with high glucose (IshikawaHG) mimicking hyperglycemia in patientEC+/dia+. Subsequently, it is discovered that IshikawaHG exhibits glucose metabolic reprogramming characterized by increased glycolysis and decreased oxidative phosphorylation. Further, pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 (PDK1) is identified to promote glycolysis of IshikawaHG by proteomics. Most importantly, JX06, a novel PDK1 inhibitor combined metformin (Met) significantly inhibits IshikawaHG proliferation though IshikawaHG is resistant to Met. Furthermore, a reduction‐sensitive biodegradable polymer is adopted to encapsulate JX06 to form nanoparticles (JX06‐NPs) for drug delivery. It is found that in vitro JX06‐NPs have better inhibitory effect on the growth of IshikawaHG as well as patient‐derived EC cells (PDC) than JX06. Additionally, it is found that JX06‐NPs can accumulate to the tumor of EC‐bearing mouse with diabetes (miceEC+/dia+) after intravenous injection, and JX06‐NPs combined Met can significantly inhibit tumor growth of miceEC+/dia+. Taken together, the study demonstrates that the combination of JX06‐NPs and Met can target the cancer metabolism plasticity, which significantly inhibits the growth of EC, thereby provides a new adjuvant therapy for patientsEC+/dia+.

No abstract

No abstract

The incidence of endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC) has been gradually increasing over the past decade. Fertility-sparing therapy with progestin is a treatment option for EEC or endometrial atypical hyperplasia (AH). The present study evaluated the role of numerous prognostic factors following fertility-sparing therapy for EEC or AH. Furthermore, the present study assessed the strength of various clinicopathological indicators for the prediction of treatment efficacy. A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with EEC and AH who received fertility-sparing therapy between August 2013 and September 2021 at Peking University People's Hospital (Beijing, China). Endometrial specimens were obtained from each patient after 3 months of treatment and at the end of the fertility-sparing therapy, before treatment efficacy and prognosis were evaluated using the χ 2 test. Furthermore, the protein expression levels of EEC biomarkers, such as estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), paired box 2 (PAX2), PTEN and p53 were assessed using immunohistochemistry. The overall complete response (CR) rate of fertility-sparing treatment in the EEC group was 67.39% (31/46), whereas that in the AH group was 86.49% (32/37). The difference between the CR rates in the EEC and AH groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no association between prognosis after treatment and ER, PAX2, PTEN or Ki-67 expression in the initially untreated AH or EEC groups. However, tissues with >50% positive PR expression were demonstrated to have a higher CR rate compared with those with ≤50% positive PR expression in both the EEC and AH groups. Furthermore, the PAX2-positive group tended to demonstrate higher CR rates compared with the PAX2-negative group in the patients with EEC. In conclusion, these data suggested that fertility-sparing therapy is effective for patients with EEC and AH who wish to remain fertile after treatment. Specifically, in the AH group, a higher proportion of patients achieved a CR whilst also achieving this more rapidly. Furthermore, PR was demonstrated to be a useful marker for the evaluation of EEC and AH.