Although the number of food governance‐related studies increased rapidly in the recent decade, the current academic research still lacked systematic integration of food safety governance. To clarify the development trends of research therein, this study summarized research articles concerning food safety governance by the Web of Science Core Collection. An in‐depth bibliometric analysis was then conducted through CiteSpace to summarize the current characters and hot spots of food safety governance research, and predicted future research trends. Results showed that food safety governance was multidisciplinary, which included environmental science, food science, economics, and agriculture. The United States had the largest number of relevant articles, and Wageningen University was the most influential scientific research institution. Among all the journals in this field, Food Policy ranked the first in publication volume and co‐citation frequency. The development of food safety governance research was divided into three processes, namely the separate formulation of the standards for public and private sectors, the joint implementation of these standards, and co‐governance by multiple sectors. The most popular research hot spots in this field were food safety policy integration and public–private partnership of food safety governance. Lower‐ and middle‐income countries focused more on food supply and food system design, and regrettably not on food safety. Higher‐income countries cared more about food safety and food nutrition. Besides, researchers of higher‐income countries also concentrated on consumers' voices in participating in food safety governance. Food safety co‐governance, online food governance, the willingness to buy safe food, and food safety governance under pandemics were considered as future research directions.

Combined with the WRSR and improved CRITIC objective assignment method, this paper measures and grades the institutional innovation levels of high-tech industries in various provinces (cities and districts) in China, compares them horizontally and vertically, and interprets the temporal and spatial difference. Advanced members are located in the eastern coastal area, and the backward members are mainly composed of the western and northeast areas (cities, districts), while the rest are at a moderate level. Vertically, the levels in most provinces (cities, districts) have maintained a stable situation, and the overall level is low. Furthermore, the research puts forward some countermeasures from three aspects of government intervention, market development and the property right system, to effectively improve the institutional innovation level of high-tech industries in China. INDEX TERMS CRITIC, high-tech industry, institutional innovation, WRSR. HAICHAO LI, born in February 1977, female, received a doctor's degree in management science and engineering from Harbin Engineering University in 2006, was employed as an associate professor in the School of Economic Management of Harbin Engineering University in 2008, and was employed as a master's tutor in 2010, has published more than 10 papers in important journals at home and abroad, presided over 4 provincial scientific research projects and participated in 6 national projects. The main research directions are industrial innovation and growth and technological innovation.

The COVID-19 pandemic caused a lockdown of Wuhan, and strict control was imposed in many major Chinese cities, including the national capital of Beijing. Residents’ committee workers at the grass-roots level have played a critical role in the enforcement of the government’s pandemic prevention and control measures, through their day-to-day service and surveillance as local community managers. This article examines their work in Wuhan and Beijing neighbourhoods during the most critical periods of the outbreak, from late January to June 2020, and the challenges the workers faced as executors of the government’s community-based prevention policy. The two cities have developed different community strategies because of very different epidemiological situations and city functions.

This paper measures and analyzes the institutional influence on the development of China's high-tech industry from 1995 to 2016. The following discoveries are shown. The institutional environment on which China's high-tech industry depends has shown an increasing trend in recent years, but its momentum is obviously weaker than that in the early stage. The calculation results are the same and comprehensive whether the institutional variable is substituted directly into the production function as the explanatory variable or if it is put into the capital stock, labor force and Total factor productivity regression equations. The institutional influences on the input-output of the high-tech industry are very clear and positive, and its influence on the TFP is the greatest. Therefore, the continuous improvement of the institutional environment of high-tech industries is conducive to promoting the high-quality development of the industry. INDEX TERMS Contribution rate, high-tech industry, institutional factor, Solo model.