The glass fiber reacts with the hydroxyl owing to the concrete pore solution. A thin coat of carbon fiber wraps around the internal GFRP bars to improve the durability of internal GFRP bars in harsh environments. This paper investigates the effect of a thin carbon fiber coat on the durability of the carbon–glass hybrid fiber reinforced polymer bars (HFRP bars) in water, and compares the performance of FRP bars in alkaline solution. To this end, the water absorption behavior, interlaminar shear strength of both the GFRP bars and the HFRP bars was characterized in water and alkaline solution. The results indicate that the diffusivity coefficient of the carbon fiber coat is higher than that of internal GFRP in water. Compared to the GFRP bars in water, the HFRP bars have a higher diffusivity coefficient and saturation water absorption. It caused that the interlaminar shear strength of the HFRP bars aged in water at a temperature of 60 °C for 140 days decreases more markedly than that of the GFRP bars aged under similar conditions. Finally, it was proved that the thin carbon fiber coat does not slow the deterioration of the GFRP bars in water, while the carbon fiber coat significantly improves the retention of the interlaminar shear strength of the HFRP bars in the alkaline solution owing to the prevention of internal glass fiber reactivated by alkali ions.

No abstract

No abstract

Glass-fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars have been widely used as a reinforcement in concrete, and glass fibers are susceptible to reacting with alkali ions in concrete pores. Thus, carbon fibers are wrapped around GFRP bars to produce carbon/glass hybrid fiber-reinforced polymer (HFRP) bars so as to promote the durability of the internal GFRP bars in concrete. This work studies the durability of the interfacial bond between GFRP bars/HFRP bars and concrete using pullout tests. The specimens are tested after immersion in distilled water for 0, 150, 255, and 544 days. The failure of the GFRP bar–concrete composite is due to damage to the GFRP bar, while the HFRP bar–concrete composite fails because of a combination of the scratching of the HFRP bar and the failure of the concrete. Both HFRP and GFRP bars are scratched as the immersion period extends. Further, the strength of the bond between the HFRP bar and concrete is lower than that of the bond between the GFRP bar and concrete, while the bond stiffness of the HFRP bar–concrete composite is higher than that of the GFRP bar–concrete composite. The bond strength of the HFRP bar–concrete and GFRP bar–concrete composites increases in the early immersion periods but decreases after 544 days of immersion in water. The retention of the bond strength of the HFRP bar–concrete composite is superior to that of the GFRP bar–concrete composite. The carbon fiber coat is proven to improve the durability of the bond between HFRP bars and concrete in water. A formula for predicting the bond strength of HFRP bar–concrete and GFRP bar–concrete composites in water is also developed. Finally, the modeling results demonstrate that the bond strength retention of the HFRP bar–concrete and GFRP bar–concrete composite is 76% and 46% after 50 years of service time, respectively.

Epoxy coatings provide an economical and practical solution for combating steel corrosion. However, epoxy coatings have poor conductivity, resulting in the accumulation of electrostatic charges. The surface conductivity and anticorrosion properties of epoxy coatings can be improved by adding nano-Cu and hydroxylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). This paper investigates the impact of MWCNTs at different concentrations (2.5, 5%) and the ratio of nano-Cu to MWCNTs on the surface conductivity and anticorrosion properties of epoxy coatings on a steel substrate. The findings from the four-probe method of measuring surface resistance indicated that the surface resistivity of steel coated with an epoxy composite of 5% MWCNTs and 65% nano-Cu (Cu65/MWCNT5) was significantly lower, approximately by one order of magnitude, compared to steel coated with a 5% MWCNT (MWCNT5) epoxy coating. When the Cu65/MWCNT5-coated steel was immersed in a 3.5 wt % NaCl solution for 30 days, it was observed that there was a minimal effect on its surface resistivity. The inclusion of a high content of MWCNTs facilitates a more uniform distribution of Cu particles within the epoxy coatings, thereby improving the anticorrosion properties of these coatings on a steel substrate. This was further corroborated by the results of the polarization curves and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, demonstrating that the Cu65/MWCNT5 epoxy coating on a steel substrate offers exceptional anticorrosion and barrier protection properties. The corrosion rate of steel with a Cu65/MWCNT5 epoxy coating was three orders of magnitude lower than that of steel with a Cu65/MWCNT2.5 epoxy coating, at 4.79 × 10−7 mm/year.