Background: One of the most common injuries encountered in orthopedic practice are Distal Radius fractures. This comprises of 8%−15% of all fractures in adults 1 . The reason for comminuted DER fractures is high-energy trauma in young and low-energytrauma in elderly. They present as shear and impacted fractures involving the articular surface of the distal radius with displacement of the fragments 2-7 . External fixation for distal radius fracture relies on the principle of Ligamentotaxisin which, a distraction force applied to the carpus aligns the fragments by means of intact ligaments. The length and alignment of fracture fragment is guided by pull and counter pull which are otherwise difficult to control 8 . Objective: To study functional outcome of distal end radius fracture treated by ligamentotaxis with evaluation of functional results according to Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score system. Material and Methods: We included 30 patients (Male 24 and Female 6) treated for distal end radius fracture during a period from 2015 to 2017. Patients were evaluated clinically by subjective assessment using DASH Scoring system. Result: After functional evaluation of patients according to the scheduled follow up with mean DASH Score of 76.08 at 1st month, 62.92 at 3rd month and 42.60 at 6th month, and was found to be Highly Significant (p<0.001) among all the compared groups. Conclusion: We concluded that external fixation and ligamentotaxis applied to complex distal radius fractures, when added with augmented K-wire fixation can provide direct augmentation of fracture stability and a good wrist function.

Background: In most of the institutes Lumbar Microdiscectomy surgery is done under General Anaesthesia. However, it is not uncommon to do these surgeries under Spinal Anaesthesia Aims and objectives: To compare the analgesic effectiveness in postoperative pain, cost-effectiveness and complications of spinal anaesthesia and general anaesthesia who underwent single Level Lumbar Microdiscectomy under General Anaesthesia vs who were administered Spinal anaesthesia for the same Materials and methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on patients undergoing lumbar micro-discectomy in the department of orthopaedics of a tertiary care hospital in Maharashtra, India. The study duration was two years [January 2020 to December 2020]. The patients older than 18 years who were not responding to 6 weeks of conservative therapy, epidural steroid injection, physiotherapy, and having low back pain with radiculopathy with claudication with or without neurological deficit were included in the study. We included 25 cases each in the spinal anaesthesia (SA) and general anaesthesia (GA) group. Outcome variables like peri-operative complications (blood loss, urinary retention, PONV), surgery length, length of stay (LOS), time from entering OT to incision, time from bandaging to exit time, and time of stay in the recovery room were studied among both the groups. Chi-square or fishers exact test to test the difference between proportions and student t-test to test between the means were statistical tests used. Results: The VAS score reduction immediately post-operative among GA group was 79% and SA group was 75% and this difference was not significant. (p>0.05)The time from post anaesthesia care unit from operation theatre [GA Vs. SA; 60.44 minutes Vs. 20.45 minutes] , time of surgery (time to enter in OT to incision) [GA Vs. SA; 30.22 minutes Vs. 15.55 minutes], time from bandaging to exit from OT[GA Vs. SA; 16.34 minutes Vs. 6.12 minutes] and average hospital stay[GA Vs. SA; 3.05 days Vs. 1.61 days] were significantly higher among GA group when compared to SA group. (p<0.05) The average cost of procedure among GA group was 26500 INR and among SA group was 18500 INR. (p<0.05) Conclusions: In terms of VAS pain score reduction, SA was comparable with GA. Our study showed that SA was superior to GA in terms of time consumption, cost, and hospital stay while maintaining better perioperative hemodynamic stability without increasing adverse side effects. Keywords: Lumbar micro-discectomy, Spinal Anaesthesia, General Anaesthesia, Cost-effectiveness

No abstract

Background: Most commonly reconstructed ligament of knee is Anterior Cruciate Ligament that aims to halt or minimise the number of instability episodes 1. Testing with biomechanical parameters has shown that there is correlation between graft cross-sectional area and maximum load to failure 2. This study attempts to analyse the functional outcome of ACL reconstruction with 5 strands of hamstring autograft Aims and Objectives: This study is based on hypothesis that larger graft will be stronger, stiffer providing better functional outcome. Materials & Methods: 35 Patients having ACL injury were treated at a tertiary care hospital; using a 5-strand hamstring graft, fixed with suspensory fixation at femoral side and aperture fixation at the tibial side. Cases were diagnosed with ACL on clinical examination & MRI. Tegner-lyshom score and International Knee Documentation Committee -Orthopaedic Scores (IKDC) is used post-operatively to grade the functional outcome of an ACL reconstruction. Results: Male predominance was observed in study subjects than female with left side slightly more commonly involved than right. Laterality didn't influenced outcome. Graft diameter observed is 9mm in 68.6%, 8 mm and 10 mm was observed in 11.4% and 20% respectively. Lysholm score at baseline was 41.63 which increased progressively to 93.45 at the end of 9 months. The IKDC score at baseline was 32.5 which increased progressively to 83.45 at the end of 12 months. Superficial infections was seen in 8.6% while complaint of knee pain was given by 2.9% cases. Lachman test was positive in 2 (5.7%) cases. Conclusion: Five-strand graft offers very high strength and more length than the 4ST. It is useful in patients with ligamentous laxity, small tendons, or other stability risk factors.

Direct laryngoscopy is well proven and most commonly used technique of orotracheal intubation. Lighted stylet device is also an established technique of orotracheal intubation. Talwalkar`s fibrelite stylet is a type of lighted stylet deviced for orotracheal intubation. This study compares pressor response elicited by Talwalkar Fibrelite Stylet (TFS) Versus direct laryngoscopic technique for orotracheal Intubation in adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia Materials & Methods: Hundred patients were randomized to undergo tracheal intubation with either the Talwalkar fibrelite stylet (TFS group, n = 50) or the direct laryngoscope (LS group, n=50). Intubation was attempted with the assigned airway device. The data collected included the rate of successful endotracheal intubation, the number of attempts required, the duration of the intubation, as well as adverse effects. Statistical Analysis: The statistical analysis of the study was carried out by using ANOVA application, Chi square test, (Pearson Chai square test.) wherever applicable. Results: In laryngoscopy group 45(95%) intubations were successful in first attempt, while 5(10%) required second attempt. In TFS group 30(60%) intubations were successful in first attempt and 20 (40%) required second attempt. The duration of successful intubation for the first tracheal intubation attempt was comparable in both groups. All intubations were completed successfully within two intubation attempt. Conclusions: As compared to conventional direct laryngoscopy, TFS is associated with lesser degree of pressor response during intubation, hence it can be safe & effective device of intubation.