We conclude that thyroidectomy without drains is safe and effective even in combination with CND and appears to confer several advantages over the routine drainage method. In addition, we achieved significant reduction of hospital stay, which led to a reduction in costs for the patients.

ObjectivesThe transoral removal of stones by sialodochoplasty has been popularized in the treatment of submandibular sialolithiasis. However, the effectiveness of sialodochoplasty is controversial, and there are no reports on the long-term outcomes of this procedure. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness and long-term outcomes of sialodochoplasty in patients with submandibular sialolithiasis.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study that included retrospective chart reviews and prospective telephone or interview surveys of 150 patients treated for submandibular sialolithiasis from March 2001 to January 2008. The patients were treated with two different procedures by two different surgeons. One surgeon performed a transoral sialolithectomy without sialodochoplasty in 107 patients (SS group), and the other surgeon performed a transoral sialolithectomy with sialodochoplasty in 43 patients (SP group).ResultsThe success rate of transoral sialolithectomy was 98.1% in the SS group and 93% in the SP group. The recurrence rates of symptoms or stones were 1.9% and 4.7% in the SS and SP groups, respectively. The incidence of postoperative transient hypoesthesia was 13.1% in the SS group and 34.9% in the SP group. The mean operating times were 29.79 and 47.44 minutes in the SS and SP groups, respectively. The mean percentage of general anesthesia was 42.1% in the SS group and 83.7% in the SP group.ConclusionSialodochoplasty in addition to transoral sialolithectomy for submandibular sialolithiasis did not affect the rate of symptom or stone recurrence, but did increase the postoperative hypoesthesia incidence and general anesthesia percentage.

BackgroundLaryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) disease has many symptoms such as globus pharyngeus, excessive throat clearing and hoarseness. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of stellate ganglion block (SGB) in addition to proton pump inhibitors (PPI) on LPR.MethodsFifty patients complaining of more than 3 typical LPR symptoms for over 3 months were enrolled in the study. The P group took PPI for 8 weeks. The SP group took PPI and interwent a series of 8 SGB procedure once a week during the period of treatment. The blocks were performed one at a time unilaterally on the right and left stellate ganglions by injecting 1% mepivacaine 6 ml. We evaluated the reflux symptom index (RSI) before treatment and following 4 weeks and 8 weeks of treatment in both groups.ResultsAfter 4 weeks of treatment, the RSI of the P group decreased, but not significantly, to 16.6 ± 6.8 compared with the baseline value of 19.2 ± 2.7 (P = 0.093), whereas the RSI of the SP group decreased significantly to 9.8 ± 3.3 compared with the baseline value of 19.0 ± 4.7 (P = 0.000). After 8 weeks of treatment, the RSI of the P group decreased significantly to 13.7 ± 6.7 (P = 0.001) and the RSI of the SP group also decreased significantly to 7.7 ± 3.4 (P = 0.000). There were significant differences in the RSI between the two groups after 4 weeks (P = 0.000) and 8 weeks (P = 0.001) of treatment.ConclusionsThe symptoms of LPR improved earlier when PPI therapy was combined with SGB compared with PPI therapy alone.

No abstract

Background and Objectives：There are many known prognostic factors such as patient's age, treatment onset, initial hearing threshold, and dizziness in patients with sudden senosrineural hearing loss. The purpose of this study was to analysis prognostic factors in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Materials and Me-thods：We reviewed the medical records of 78 patients who were diagnosed as sudden senosorineural hearing loss and treated in Soonchunhyang University Hospital from February 1998 to October 2003, retrospectively. Results：Recovery was seen in 43 of 78 cases (55.1%). Patients who had been treated within a week after symptom onset had better recovery rate than those treated after a week. Patients with U-shaped pattern and ascending pattern of initial audiogram had a better recovery rate than others. Patients with mild and severe hearing loss had a better recovery rate than others. Patients without diabetes mellitus had a better recovery rate than with diabetes mellitus. But these prognostic factors did not showed correlation statistically (p>0.05). Age, sex, dizziness, hypertension, and CRF did not showed statistically significant correlation with final result of hearing recovery. Conclusions：We can predict hearing outcome of sudden sensorineural hearing loss more accurately on the basis overall prognostic factors.