BACKGROUNDHealth care disparities have been identified in the treatment of older and racial/ethnic minority breast carcinoma patients. The purpose of the current study was to examine racial/ethnic group differences in the treatment decision‐making process of older breast carcinoma patients and the differential impact on treatment received.METHODSA cross‐sectional survey was conducted of a population‐based, consecutive sample identified by the Los Angeles Cancer Surveillance Program comprised of Latina (n = 99), African‐American (n = 66), and white (n = 92) women age ≥ 55 years (total n = 257) and who were between 3–9 months after their primary breast carcinoma diagnosis.RESULTSApproximately 49% of less acculturated Latinas and 18% of more acculturated Latinas indicated that their family members determined the final treatment decision, compared with less than 4% of African‐Americans and whites (P < 0.001). This disparity remained in multiple logistic regression analysis, controlling for potential confounders, including sociodemographic, physician–patient communication, social support, and health variables. Compared with African‐American and white women, Latina women were more likely to identify a family member as the final treatment decision‐maker (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] of 7.97; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.43–26.20, for less acculturated Latinas; and AOR of 4.48; 95% CI, 1.09–18.45, for more acculturated Latinas). A multiple logistic regression model, controlling for sociodemographic and health characteristics, indicated that patients were less likely to receive breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) when the family made the final treatment decision (AOR of 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18–0.85).CONCLUSIONSFamily appears to play a powerful role in treatment decision‐making among older Latina breast carcinoma patients, regardless of the level of acculturation. This family influence appears to contribute to racial/ethnic group differences in treatment received. Physicians should acknowledge and educate patients' family members as potential key participants in medical decision‐making, rather than merely as translators and providers of social support. Cancer 2006. © 2006 American Cancer Society.

In breast cancer patients aged 55 years and older, surgeons' solicitation of patients' treatment preferences was a powerful independent predictor of patient participation in treatment decision-making, as was patient's self-efficacy in interacting with physicians. Increasing both physicians' and patients' partnership-building skills might enhance the quality of treatment decision-making and treatment outcomes in this burgeoning patient population.

Objectives To examine racial/ethnic disparities in older women’s health-related quality of life (QOL) and type of breast cancer treatment as mediated by physician level and individual level variables. Methods A cross-sectional survey of a population-based, consecutive sample identified through the Los Angeles Cancer Surveillance Program of Latina (n = 99), African-American (n = 66), and White (n = 92) women aged 55 years or older (N = 257) between 3 and 9 months after primary breast cancer diagnosis and at least one month post treatment. An exploratory, empirically-developed latent variable model tested the relationships among demographic and physician-related variables, patient attitudes, and health-related outcomes. Health-related outcomes included QOL measures and receipt of breast conserving surgery (BCS). Results Latinas reported less BCS and poorer QOL compared to Whites. Physician communication that can empower patients, in terms of patient efficacy in patient-physician interactions and breast cancer knowledge, mitigated racial/ethnic disparities in receipt of BCS. Physician emotional support was not related to patient cognitive empowerment and treatment outcomes. Medical mistrust in minority women was related to less self-efficacy and less positive coping, as well as, both directly and indirectly, to reduced QOL. Latinas reported poorer QOL in the tested model. Conclusions Physician communication style, specifically information-giving and participatory decision-making, may empower older women with breast cancer and help mitigate racial/ethnic disparities in surgical treatment received.

For older women with breast cancer, both partners and adult children were important sources of support and their adjustment affected the women's mental health. Support sources and their impact on women's mental health varied among racial/ethnic groups, suggesting the importance of culturally sensitive provision of care by clinicians.

Background Belief in divine control is often assumed to be fatalistic. However, the assumption has rarely been investigated in racial/ethnic minorities. Objectives This study aims to examine the association between belief in divine control and coping and how the association was moderated by ethnicity/acculturation in a multi-ethnic sample of breast cancer patients. Methods Latina, African American, and non-Hispanic White older women with newly diagnosed breast cancer (N=257) from a population-based survey completed the scale of Belief in Divine Control and the Brief COPE. Results Belief in divine control was positively related to approach coping (i.e., positive reframing, active coping, and planning) in all ethnic groups. Belief in divine control was positively related to acceptance and negatively related to avoidance coping (i.e., denial and behavioral disengagement) among low-acculturated Latinas. Conclusions Negative presumptions about fatalistic implications of belief in divine control should be critically reappraised, especially when such skepticism is applied to racial/ethnic minority patients.