ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to examine the fluctuations in CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and natural CD4+CD25+FoxP3+T-regulatory (Treg) cells following an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in participants with and those without type 2 diabetes (T2DM).Methods19 Japanese participants with T2DM (DM group) and 21 participants without diabetes (non-DM group) were recruited and underwent a 75-g OGTT. The cell numbers of leukocytes, lymphocytes, and the T cell compartment, such as CD4+, CD8+, and Treg, were calculated for blood samples obtained after an overnight 12 h fast and during a 75-g OGTT at 60 and 120 min.ResultsBefore glucose loading, no differences in the cell numbers of leukocytes, lymphocytes, CD4+, CD8+, and Treg were observed between the DM group and the non-DM group. The proportion of CD8+ was significantly reduced, whereas the proportion of CD4+ was significantly increased, after 120 min of glucose loading in both groups. The proportion of Treg was not affected. Furthermore, a significant positive correlation was observed between the AUC0–120 min of CD8+ and the change in the free fatty acid level following the OGTT (ρ = 0.39, P < 0.05), but not that of glucose or insulin.ConclusionThe proportion of CD4+ T cells was increased and that of CD8+ T cells was reduced after glucose loading in both subjects with and without diabetes. These findings suggest that glucose loading dynamically affects the balance of the circulating T lymphocyte subset, regardless of glucose tolerance.

No abstract

The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors vildagliptin and sitagliptin are effective in treating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Patients receiving standard doses of sitagliptin plus insulin may require increased doses of sitagliptin or switching to vildagliptin to improve blood glucose control. This study compared the effects of increasing sitagliptin and switching to vildagliptin in type 2 diabetes patients receiving standard doses of sitagliptin plus insulin. This prospective, randomized, parallel-group comparison trial enrolled 33 type 2 diabetes patients receiving 50 mg sitagliptin once daily plus insulin. Seventeen patients were randomized to 50 mg vildagliptin twice daily, and 16 to 100 mg sitagliptin once daily, and evaluated by continuous glucose monitoring at baseline and after 8 weeks. The primary end-point was the change in mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE). MAGE decreased from baseline in both the vildagliptin (-13.4 ± 35.7 mg/dL) and sitagliptin (-8.4 ± 24.3 mg/dL) groups, but neither within- nor between-group changes were statistically significant. Similarly, the areas under the curve for blood glucose levels ≥180 mg/dL and <70 mg/dL tended to improve in both groups, but these differences were not statistically significant. In contrast, HbA1c was significantly reduced only in the vildagliptin group, from 7.1 ± 0.6% at baseline to 6.8 ± 0.6% at 8 weeks (p=0.006). Increasing sitagliptin dose and switching to vildagliptin had limited effects in improving MAGE in type 2 diabetic patients treated with standard doses of sitagliptin.