PurposeTo evaluate the agreement between optical biometry with swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometry (IOLMaster 700) and other devices.MethodsA total of 137 eyes (78 patients) with cataracts were included in this retrospective study. Axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), keratometry, and white-to-white (WTW) distance measured using IOLMaster 700 were compared with results for the following five different biometers: IOLMaster 500, A-scan, automated refractor, manual keratometry, and Galilei G4. Differences and correlations among the devices were assessed using the Bland-Altman plot and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).ResultsFor AL values, the IOLMaster 700, IOLMaster 500, and A-scan measurements showed excellent agreement (all ICC >0.99). For ACD values, ICC of IOLMaster 700 and Galilei G4 was 0.965 but A-scan was poorly correlated with either IOLMaster 700 or Galilei G4. The ICCs of IOLMaster 700 and other devices were all greater than 0.9 for average keratometry, but those of the mean cylinder keratometry were all between 0.7 and 0.8. The mean difference in the WTW distance between the IOLMaster 700 and Galilei G4 was 0.029 mm, but the ICC was 0.525. AL measurements were not possible for 10 eyes with the IOLMaster 500 but were obtained in all eyes with the IOLMaster 700.ConclusionsIn clinical practice, AL, ACD, and average keratometry values of IOLMaster 700 can be used interchangeably with those of the other devices tested. However, the ACD value between IOLMaster 700 and A-scan or the WTW distance between IOLMaster 700 and Galilei G4 are not interchangeable because of clinical and statistical differences in measurements between the devices.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the short-term efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) and posterior sub-tenon triamcinolone injections (PSTI) on the basis of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) patterns in diabetic macular edema (DME).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 73 eyes of 73 patients with DME. Based on the presence of serous retinal detachment (SRD), eyes were categorized into two groups, and either IVB or PSTI treatment was performed. Central macular thickness (CMT) and the degree of SRD were assessed preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively. The severity of intraretinal edema was approximated based on the distance from the external limiting membrane to the internal limiting membrane.ResultsIn eyes with SRD, reduction of SRD was greater with IVB than with PSTI. Moreover, reduction of intraretinal edema was greater with PSTI than with IVB. In eyes without SRD, PSTI achieved greater CMT reduction, compared with IVB.ConclusionsIn DME patients with SRD, IVB achieved greater reduction of SRD, compared with PSTI; however, intraretinal edema responded more favorably to PSTI, regardless of the presence of SRD. Our results suggest that the classification of DME based on OCT findings may be useful to predict responses to IVB or PSTI treatments.

No abstract

Purpose:To compare the efficacy and safety of Laser Blended Vision (LBV) and monovision laser refractive surgery (monovision) for presbyopia correction in patients with myopia. Methods: This retrospective comparative study included 42 eyes of 21 patients with LBV and 50 eyes of 25 patients with monovision. Monocular and binocular distance, intermediate and near visual acuity, and refractive changes were evaluated preoperatively and 3 months after the surgery and compared. The patients in the LBV group underwent further evaluation of spherical aberration 3 months after the surgery and treatment satisfaction 3-6 months after the surgery. Results: The mean age of the patients was 47.9 years in the LBV group and 41.7 years in the monovision group. Three months after surgery, the spherical equivalents were +0.11 ± 0.17 D in the dominant eye and -1.52 ± 0.36 D in the non-dominant eye in the LBV group. In contrast, the spherical equivalents were +0.23 ± 0.26 D in the dominant eye and -0.82 ± 0.28 D in the non-dominant eye in the monovision group. All patients achieved a binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity of 0.10 (log MAR) or better, and 86% of the LBV group and 100% of the monovision group achieved a binocular uncorrected intermediate visual acuity of better than 0.10. Moreover, 95% of the LBV group and 100% of the monovision group achieved a binocular uncorrected near visual acuity of better than 0.18. In the LBV group, mean spherical aberration increased after surgery than before, but it was not statistically significant. Complications such as corneal opacity that could decrease visual acuity were absent in both groups. Overall patient satisfaction after surgery was 80% in the LBV group. Conclusions: Despite the relatively higher mean age of the LBV group, both groups showed similar results regarding presbyopia correction in patients with myopia.

No abstract