Phytochrome from leaves of light-grown oat (Avena sativa L. cv. Garry) plants is characterized with newly generated monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) directed to it. The results indicate that there are at least two phytochromes in green oat leaves, each of which differs from the phytochrome that is most abundant in etiolated oat tissue. When analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) with reference to 124-kilodalton (kDa) phytochrome from etiolated oats, the two phytochromes from green oats have monomer sizes of 123 of 125 kDa. Immunoblot analysis of SDS, sample buffer extracts of lyophilized, green oat leaves indicates that neither the 125-kDa nor the 123-kDa polypeptide is a degradation product arising after tissue homogenization. Of the two, the 123-kDa phytochrome appears to be the predominant species in light-grown oat leaves. During SDS-PAGE in the presence of 1 mM Zn(2+), 123-kDa phytochrome undergoes a mobility shift corresponding to an apparent mass increase of 2 kDa. In contrast, the electrophoretic mobility of 125-kDa phytochrome is unaffected by added Zn(2+). Some MAbs that recognize 123-kDa phytochrome fail to recognize 125-kDa phytochrome and vice versa, indicating that these two phytochromes are not only immunochemically distinct from 124-kDa phytochrome, but also from each other. It is evident, therefore, that there are at least three phytochromes in an oat plant: 124-kDa phytochrome, which is most abundant in etiolated tissue, plus 123-and 125-kDa phytochromes, which predominate in light-grown tissue.
An oat (Avena sativa L.) plant contains at least three phytochromes, which have monomeric masses of 125, 124, and 123 kilodaltons (kDa) (Wang et al., 1991, Planta 184, 96-104). The 124-kDa phytochrome is most abundant in dark-grown seedlings, while the other two phytochromes predominate in light-grown seedlings. Using three monoclonal antibodies, each specific to one of the three phytochromes, we have monitored by immunoblot assay the expression of these three phytochromes in the 5 d following onset of imbibition of seeds. On a per-organism basis, each of these three phytochromes increased in abundance for the first 3 d in the light, or for the first 4 d in darkness, after which they each began to decrease in quantity. When 3-d-old dark-grown seedlings were transferred to the light, the abundance of each of these three phytochromes decreased both in absolute amount and relative to the phytochrome levels in control seedlings kept in darkness. In contrast, when 3-d-old light-grown seedlings were transferred to darkness, the abundance of the 124-kDa and 125-kDa phytochromes increased while that of 123-kDa phytochrome remained unchanged. In each case, the level of phytochrome was greater than that of control seedlings maintained in the light. Thus, in addition to temporal regulation, all three phytochromes exhibit photoregulated expression at the protein level, although the magnitude of this photoregulation varies substantially.
Seven monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have been prepared to phytochrome from green oat (Avena sativa L. cv. Garry) leaves. One of these MAbs (GO-1) cross-reacts with apoprotein of the phytochrome that is most abundant in etiolated oat shoots as assessed by immunoblot assay of fusion proteins expressed in Escherichia coli. The epitope for this MAb is located between amino acids 618 and 686 in the primary sequence of type 3 phytochrome (Hershey et al. 1985, Nucleic Acids Res. 13, 8543-8559), which is one of the predominant phytochromes in etiolated oats. Three other MAbs (GO-4, GO-5, GO-6) immunoprecipitate phytochrome isolated from green oat leaves, as evaluated by photoreversibility assay. GO-1, GO-4, GO-5 and GO-6 are therefore directed to phytochrome. While evidence obtained with the other three MAbs (GO-2, GO-7, GO-8) strongly indicates that they are also directed to phytochrome, this evidence is not as rigorous. Recognition of antigen by any of these seven MAbs is not significantly reduced by periodate oxidation, indicating that their epitopes probably do not include carbohydrate. All but GO-1 bind either very poorly or not at all the phytochrome that is abundant in etiolated oat shoots. These data reinforce earlier observations made with antibodies directed to phytochrome from etiolated oats, indicating (1) that the phytochromes that predominate in etiolated and green oats differ immunochemically and (2) that phytochrome preparations from green oat leaves contain very little of the phytochrome that is abundant in etiolated shoots. An hypothesis that these two immunochemically distinct phytochromes form heterodimers in vitro.
Abstract— Three phytochrome apoproteins in unimbibed seeds of Avena saliva L. were identified with monoclonal antibodies directed to, and specific for, three oat phytochromes with monomeric molecular masses of 125, 124 and 123 kDa [Wang et al., 1991, Planta 184, 96–104]. All three phytochromes were readily detected in embryo‐containing portions. Only trace amounts were found in endosperm tissue. Phytochrome photoreversibility was detected after concentration and partial purification of embryo extracts by fractionation with ammonium sulfate, indicating that at least one of these seed phytochromes had its chromophore prosthetic group bound to it. Immunoblot analyses were performed to quantitate each of the three phytochromes in unimbibed seeds. Quantitation of phytochromes in detergent‐free extracts led to serious underestimates of phytochrome contents in the unimbibed seeds. In contrast, more than 93% of each of the three phytochromes in the unimbibed seeds was extracted when a modified sodium dodecyl sulfate sample buffer was used as the extraction medium. In such extracts, we measured per embryo 1.40 ± 0.12. 1.60 ± 0.05 and 6.13 ± 0.31 ng of 125–, 124– and 123‐kDa phytochrome, respectively.
We have addressed two issues regarding the spatial distribution of three phytochromes in 3-d-old oat (Avena sativa L.) seedlings. Three monoclonal antibodies, GO-4, GO-7 and Oat-22, were used as probes. Each antibody detects only one of the phytochromes. The first issue is whether any of the phytochromes might be membrane-bound. To address this issue the abundance of each phytochrome in extracts prepared with either a detergent-free or a detergent-containing buffer was compared by immunoblot assay. The detergent-free buffer was formulated to extract only soluble protein, while the detergent-containing buffer was intended to extract both soluble and membrane proteins. None of the data indicate that any of these three phytochromes is membrane-bound in either a dark- or a light-grown seedling. The second issue is whether these three phytochromes are distributed differentially in 3-d-old dark- and light-grown seedlings. When seedlings were dissected into shoots, scutellums, and roots, all three phytochromes were detected in all three fractions from both dark- and light-grown seedlings. Each of the three phytochromes was most abundant in the shoot and least abundant in the root, except that in light-grown seedlings type I, etiolated-tissue phytochrome was more abundant in the root than in either the shoot or the scutellum. When the equivalent fractions dissected from different seedlings were compared, those dissected from dark-grown seedlings contained a higher quantity of each of the three phytochromes than did those dissected from light-grown seedlings, except that green-tissue, type II phytochromes did not differ significantly in the roots. At this level of resolution, no evidence was obtained to indicate a substantive difference among the three phytochromes in their spatial distribution.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.