Background: Nonfusion fixation is an effective way to treat lumbar degeneration. In the present study, we analyzed the clinical effects and radiographic outcomes of the Isobar TTL system used to treat two-segment lumbar degenerative disease. Method: Forty-one patients diagnosed with two-segment lumbar degenerative disease underwent surgical implantation of the Isobar TTL dynamic stabilization system (n = 20) or a rigid system (n = 21) from January 2013 to June 2017. The mean follow-up time was 23.6 (range 15-37) months. Clinical results were evaluated with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), modified Macnab criteria, and the visual analog score (VAS). Radiographic evaluations included the height of the intervertebral space and the range of motion (ROM) of the treated and adjacent segments. The intervertebral disc signal was classified using the modified Pfirrmann grading system and the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) system. Results: The clinical results, including the ODI and VAS, showed that there was significant improvement in the two groups after implantation and that the difference between the two groups was not significant. In addition, the clinical efficacy indicated by the modified Macnab criteria for the two groups was similar. Radiological outcomes included the height of the intervertebral space, lumbar mobility, and intervertebral disc signal. The height of the intervertebral space of the upper adjacent segment L2/3 in the rigid group was significantly lower than that in the Isobar TTL group at the last follow-up. Furthermore, the number of ROMs of the fixed-segment L3/4 in the Isobar TTL group was significantly less than that before implantation, suggesting that the fixed-segment ROMs in the Isobar TTL group were limited. In addition, the ROM of the upper adjacent segment L2/3 in the last follow-up of the rigid group increased significantly, while that of the Isobar TTL group did not change after implantation. Finally, the incidence of adjacent-segment degeneration (ASD) was significantly greater in the rigid group than in the Isobar TTL group according to the UCLA system. Conclusion: The Isobar TTL system can be clinically effective for treating two-segment lumbar degenerative disease. Compared with rigid fixation, the Isobar TTL system yielded better radiographic outcomes and maintained the mobility of the treated segments with less impact on the proximal adjacent segment.

Background This study compares the use of radiographic K-Rod dynamic stabilization to the rigid system for the treatment of multisegmental degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (MDLSS). Methods A total of 40 patients with MDLSS who underwent surgical treatment using the K-Rod (n = 25) and rigid systems (n = 15) from March 2013 to March 2017 were assessed. The mean follow-up period was 29.1 months. JOA, ODI, VAS and modified Macnab were assessed. Radiographic evaluations included lumbar lordosis angle, ISR value, operative and proximal adjacent ROM. Changes in intervertebral disc signal were classified according to Pfirrmann grade and UCLA system. Results JOA, ODI and VAS changed significantly after the operation to comparable levels between the groups. However, the lumbar lordosis significantly decreased at final follow-up between both groups. The ROM of the proximal adjacent segment increased at final follow-up, but the number of fixed segment ROMs in the K-Rod group were significantly lower at the final follow-up than observed prior to the operation. In both groups, the ISR of the proximal adjacent segment decreased, most notably in the rigid group. The ISR of the non-fusion fixed segments in the K-Rod group increased post-operation and during final follow-up. The levels of adjacent segment degeneration were higher in the rigid group vs. the K-Rod group according to modified Pfirrmann grading and the UCLA system. Conclusions Compared with the rigid system for treatment of MDLSS, dynamic K-Rod stabilization achieves improved radiographic outcomes and improves the mobility of the stabilized segments, minimizing the influence on the proximal adjacent segment.

Arachnoiditis ossificans is a rare, chronic and progressive disease, especially cauda equina. Most of its causes are due to severe trauma or sequelae after spinal surgery, generally gradual calcification from the initial adhesive arachnoiditis to the end stage of ossified arachnoiditis. At present, the treatment of this rare disease standard is difficult to determine, and the clinical outcomes of conservative and surgical treatment options remain controversial. We present a 26-year-old female patient who was postoperative lumbar surgery for trauma, plain and reconstructive X-ray, CT and MRI images showed an ossified lesion within the master at the L5-S1 levels and compression of the left spinal canal at L4/5 level. We explored and decompressed spinal canal and released root nerves, while the calcified cauda equina nerve was not treated. Postoperative supportive treatment including detumescence, anti-inflammation, nutritional nerve and analgesia, the postoperative clinical course of the patient was good and the patient was very satisfied with the curative effect. This case, along with a review of literature is reported.

Background: Non-fusion fixation is an effective way to treat lumbar degeneration. The present study evaluated the clinical effect analysis and radiographic outcomes of Isobar TTL system for two-segmental lumbar degenerative disease. Method: Forty-one patients with two-segmental lumbar degenerative disease who underwent surgical treatment by Isobar TTL dynamic stabilization system (n=20) and rigid system (n=21) from January 2013 to June 2017. The mean follow-up period was 23.6 (range 15–37) months. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by oswestry dysfunction index (ODI), visual analogue score (VAS) and modified Macnab. Radiographic evaluations included the height of intervertebral space and range of motion (ROM) of the operative segments and proximal adjacent segment. The intervertebral disc signal change was classified by the modified Pfirrmann grade and University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) system. Results: The clinical outcomes including the ODI and VAS were significantly improved in two groups after operation, but the difference between two groups was not significant. In addition, the clinical efficacy of modified Macnab in two groups was similar too. Radiologic outcomes include height of intervertebral space, lumbar mobility and intervertebral disc signal. The height of intervertebral space of upper adjacent segments of L2/3 in the rigid group were significantly lower than those in the Isobar TTL group at the last follow-up. Furthermore, the number of fixed segment ROM of L3/4 in Isobar TTL group was significantly lower than pre-operation, suggesting that fixed segment ROMs in Isobar TTL group were limited. And, the ROM of upper adjacent segments of L2/3 in the last follow-up of rigid group increased significantly, while the ROM of L2/3 in Isobar TTL group haven’t changed after operation. At last, the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration was significantly greater in the rigid group than the Isobar TTL group according to modified Pfirrmann grading system and the UCLA system. Conclusion: Isobar TTL system could get a good clinical effect for treatment of two-segmental lumbar degenerative disease. Compared with rigid fixation, Isobar TTL system can get better radiographic outcomes and maintain the mobility of the stabilized segments with less influence on the proximal adjacent segment.