The complete or partial collapse of the forests of Amazonia is consistently named as one of the top ten possible tipping points of Planet Earth in a changing climate. However, apart from a few observational studies that showed increased mortality after the severe droughts of 2005 and 2010, the evidence for such collapse depends primarily on modelling. Such studies are notoriously deficient at predicting the rainfall in the Amazon basin and how the vegetation interacts with the rainfall is poorly represented. Here, we use long-term surface-based observations of the air temperature and rainfall in Amazonia to provide a constraint on the modelled sensitivity of temperature to changes in precipitation. This emergent constraint also allows us to significantly constrain the likelihood of a forest collapse or dieback. We conclude that Amazon dieback under IPCC scenario RCP8.5 (crossing the tipping point) is not likely to occur in the twenty-first century.
Understanding the effects of climate variability and reservoir operation on runoff is important for shipping, irrigation and water supply services, especially during extreme drought years. After the operation of the Three Gorges Dam (TGD) began, the discharge processes in the mid-lower reaches of the Yangtze River were completely different from those during the pre-dam period. The measured hydrological data and the Mike 11-HD model were used to estimate the contributions of the TGD operation and climate variability to the variation in discharge during extreme drought years. The results are as follows: under the effects of the TGD operation and extreme drought, the special phenomenon of a “positive discharge anomaly in drought season and negative discharge anomaly in flood season” occurred compared with the conditions in the pre-dam period. During the flood season, the contributions of climate variation (TGD operation) to the changes in streamflow from Yichang station to Datong station were 86.6% (13.4%) and 80.7% (19.7%) in 2006 and 64.8% (35.2%) and 71.3% (28.7%) in 2011. During the dry season, the values were 81.2% (18.8%) and 93.9% (6.1%) in 2006 and 59.9% (40.1%) and 72.9% (27.1%) in 2011. Clearly, climate variation was the main reason for the variation in seasonal runoff. Furthermore, even in the 156 m and 175 m impoundments, climate variation was the dominant factor.
This study investigated the influence of the Three Gorges Dam (TGD) on the evolution of nearby channels in the Yangtze River (Changjiang River) system in order to better understand the environmental impact of large‐scale reservoir operations. From 2003 to 2017, the amounts of runoff and sediment transport in the Yangtze River were reduced by 3.3–14.5% and 67.8–92.7%, respectively, relative to 1955–2002 before the TGD was operational. Topographic measurements of the middle reaches (Yichang to Hukou) of the Yangtze River were analyzed from 1975 to 2017, during which time the cumulative erosion of the flood channel was 22.78 × 108 m3, and the dry channel accounted for 90.3% of the erosion. Following commissioning of the TGD, the scouring intensity of the sandy gravel section near the dam initially increased then decreased, whereas the scouring intensity of sandy sections away from the dam continued to increase. Beaches on convex banks of curved sections were scoured, and deep channels on concave banks became silted. In braided sections, the braids tended to shrink, and the diversion ratio of the main branch during dry seasons reduced, resulting in frequent branch alternation. Compared to changes in the downstream river channels of other large reservoirs worldwide, scouring from the TGD is extensive. The findings of this study are significant for river channel regulation and waterway planning in the Yangtze River and worldwide.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.