Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of a secondary stroke prevention protocol in the general out-patient clinic.Design: Cohort study with pre-and postintervention comparisons.Setting: Two general out-patient clinics in Hong Kong.Patients: Ischaemic stroke patients who had longterm follow-up in two clinics were recruited. The patients of one clinic received the intervention (intervention group) and the patients of the second clinic did not receive the intervention (control group). The recruitment period lasted for 6 months from 1 September 2008 to 28 February 2009. The pre-intervention phase data collection started within this 6-month period. The protocol implementation started at the intervention clinic on 1 April 2009. The post-intervention phase data collection started 9 months after the protocol implementation, and ran for 6 months from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2010. Main outcome measures:Clinical data before and after the intervention, including blood pressure, glycated haemoglobin level, low-density lipoprotein level and prescription pattern, were compared between the two groups to see whether there was enhancement of secondary stroke management.Results: A total of 328 patients were recruited into the intervention group and 249 into the control group; data of 256 and 210 patients from these groups were analysed, respectively. After intervention, there Implementation of secondary stroke prevention protocol for ischaemic stroke patients in primary care IntroductionStroke is the second commonest cause of death worldwide 1 and the fourth leading cause of death in Hong Kong.2 Stroke is also the commonest cause of permanent disability in adults. Patients with stroke are at high risk for recurrent stroke and other major vascular events. As the ageing population is New knowledge added by this study • A standard secondary stroke prevention protocol can significantly improve the control of cardiovascular risk factors in ischaemic stroke patients.• Implementation of such a programme is effective and feasible in local primary care. Implications for clinical practice or policy • This study supports more widespread use of a secondary stroke prevention programme in the setting of a general out-patient clinic.
Background We aim to document the long-term outcomes of ischemic stroke patients and explore the potential risk factors for recurrent cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in primary care. Methods A retrospective cohort study performed at two general out-patient clinics (GOPCs) under Hospital Authority (HA) in Hong Kong (HK). Ischemic stroke patients with at least two consecutive follow-up visits during the recruitment period (1/1–30/6/2010) were included. Patients were followed up regularly till the date of recurrent stroke, cardiovascular event, death or 31/12/2018. The primary outcome was the occurrence of recurrent cerebrovascular event including transient ischemic stroke (TIA), ischemic stroke or hemorrhagic stroke. The secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and coronary artery disease (CAD). We fit cox proportional hazard model adjusting death as competing risk factor to estimate the cause-specific hazard ratio (csHR). Results A total of 466 patients (mean age, 71.5 years) were included. During a median follow-up period of 8.7 years, 158 patients (33.9%) died. Eighty patients (17.2%) had recurrent stroke and 57 (12.2%) patients developed CAD. Age was an independent risk factor for recurrent stroke, CAD and death. Statin therapy at baseline had a protective effect for recurrent stroke (csHR = 0.476; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.285–0.796, P = 0.005) after adjusting death as a competing risk factor and all-cause mortality (HR = 0.693, 95% CI 0.486–0.968, P = 0.043). In addition, female sex, antiplatelet and a higher diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at baseline were also independent predictors for survival. Conclusions Long term prognosis of ischemic stroke patients in primary care is favorable. Use of statin was associated with a significant decrease in stroke recurrence and mortality. Patients who died had a significant lower DBP at baseline, highlighted the need to consider both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in our daily practice.
Background: We aim to document the long-term outcomes of ischemic stroke patients and explore the potential risk factors for recurrent cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in primary care.Methods: A retrospective cohort study performed at two general out-patient clinics (GOPCs) under Hospital Authority (HA) in Hong Kong (HK). Ischemic stroke patients with at least two consecutive follow-up visits during the recruitment period (1/1-30/6/2010) were enrolled. Patients were followed up regularly till the date of recurrent stroke, cardiovascular event, death or 31/12/2018. Risks of recurrent cardiovascular events and death were estimated by Cox proportional hazards model. The primary outcome was the occurrence of recurrent cerebrovascular event including transient ischemic stroke (TIA), ischemic stroke or hemorrhagic stroke. The secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and coronary heart disease (CHD).Results: A total of 466 patients (mean age, 71.5 years) were enrolled. During a median follow-up period of 8.7 years, 158 patients (33.9%) died. Eighty patients (17.2%) had recurrent stroke and 57 (12.2%) patients developed CHD. Age was an independent risk factor for recurrent stroke, CHD and death. Statin therapy at baseline had a protective effect for recurrent stroke (hazard ratio [HR] =0.454, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.269-0.766, P=0.003) and all-cause mortality (HR= 0.693, 95% CI 0.486-0.968, P=0.043). In addition, female sex, antiplatelet and a higher diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at baseline were also independent predictors for survival.Conclusions: Long term prognosis of ischemic stroke patients in primary care is favorable. Use of statin was associated with a significant decrease in stroke recurrence and mortality. Patients who died had a significant lower DBP at baseline, highlighted the need to consider both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in our daily practice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.