Background Endobronchial lipoma is an extremely rare benign tumor, which is generally located in the first three subdivisions of the tracheobronchial tree. According to the existing literature, all endobronchial lipomas are single (one per patient). Here, we report a rare case in which the patient presented with two endobronchial lipomas in the same patient, and underwent a bronchoscopic tumor resection in the left main bronchus and the left lower bronchus. Both tumors were pathologically confirmed as endobronchial lipoma. Case presentation A 52-year-old Chinese man presented at the clinic reporting a mild cough with yellow color sputum and exertional dyspnea for 2 weeks. He was a heavy smoker (45 pack-years). Chest auscultation demonstrated faint wheezing in left lower lobe. Computed tomography (CT) revealed two low-density endobronchial masses located in the middle segment of the left main bronchus and the posterior basilar segmental bronchus of the left lower lobe. The neoplasms measured a CT-attenuation value of -70HU, −98HU in density with air trapping and atelectasis in the segmental bronchus of the left lower lobe. The patient underwent interventional bronchoscopic management to remove the neoplasms by using an electrosurgical snare, cryotherapy, and electrocautery. The locations of the neoplasms were confirmed at the left main bronchus and the superior segment of the left lower lobe during bronchoscopic intervention. Histopathological examination confirmed that both tissues were consistent with lipomas. After 18 months of follow-up, the patient was free of symptoms and CT revealed that bronchiectasia remained in the superior segment of the left lower lobe; however, no mass lesion was present in the left bronchus. Conclusions This case suggests that an endobronchial lipoma can present as multiple lesions, and both proximal and distal types can simultaneously occur in the same patient. Thus, these findings help us further understand the biology of endobronchial lipomas.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Strategies involving multidimensional approaches for the treatment of COPD are needed. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of medical consortium-based management for COPD. Patients were grouped in accordance with whether the hospitals they went to were under the medical consortium. We enrolled 141 COPD patients in the management group and 147 COPD patients in the control group. There was no predetermined sex and disease severity inclusion or exclusion criteria. Patients in the control group were managed by standard care, while patients in the management group were managed with intensive medical intervention jointly by specialists in the hospital and general practitioners and healthcare workers in community health centers. There was no difference in the basal demographics between the two groups. The basal condition of the management group was worse than that of the control group, demonstrated by a higher CAT score and a lower pulmonary function index. Half-year intensive intervention decreased CAT score from 17.28 to 15.62 and the Barthel ADL index from 73 to 60 in the management group, which was associated with better pulmonary rehabilitation, pursed-lip breathing, oxygen usage, and medicine regularity. The benefits became more obvious after one-year intensive intervention in the management group. There was a difference in mMRC grades and smoking cessation between the two groups. This study shows that a one-year intensive intervention improves the patients’ health status and pulmonary function, suggesting that our medical consortium-based management is effective in the treatment of COPD.
Rationale: Pneumonic-type lung cancer (PTLC) is a special type of lung cancer with cough and expectoration as the main clinical symptoms and inflammatory signals as the main imaging manifestations. PTLC can be easily misdiagnosed as pneumonia, and the diagnosis and treatment are always delayed. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), as an emerging and effective method to identify occult pathogens, has been gradually adopted by clinicians. Patient concerns: A 58-year-old woman with recurrent cough and expectoration was admitted to hospital on January 12th, 2022. She reported that she was diagnosed with pneumonia half a month ago, after treatment with expectorant and antibiotics for 5 days, the symptoms were relieved. However, the symptoms worsened again 10 days after stopping the drugs. On the current presentation, she denied exposure to patients with infection of COVID-19, smoking history, night sweats, weight loss, rash, joint pain, fever, and shortness of breath. Diagnoses: The patient was diagnosed with non-mucinous pneumonic-type lung adenocarcinoma according to the clinical symptoms, changes of CT scans after treatment and cytopathology examinations. Interventions and outcomes: The patient was initially diagnosed with pulmonary infection according to computerized tomography (CT) scan. Expectorant and antibiotics used. However, the symptoms worsened again 10 days after stopping the drugs. On her return visit, the CT scan did not showed obvious consolidation absorption and was similar to the previous imaging findings. mNGS was performed to detect the occult pathogens. None pathogen was detected, however, 39 copy number variations were found in Human Chromosomal Instability Analysis of mNGS indicating the presence of tumor cells. The cytopathology findings confirmed the presence of lung adenocarcinoma (non-mucinous adenocarcinoma). She was treated with targeted antitumor drugs, and the CT scan after 20 days of targeted antitumor therapy showed obvious absorption of the lesions. Lessons: mNGS may have potential value to screen tumor cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with PTLC, especially in the patients whose samples in bronchioli cannot be collected using existing sampling tools.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.