Background Abscopal effect is the out-of-field response to localized irradiation therapy that results in systemic antitumorigenic effects such as the regression of a tumor distant from the target site. Case presentation A 76-year-old woman was diagnosed with pulmonary adenocarcinoma (cT1bN0M0 stage IA), and right upper lobectomy was performed in November 2015. The pathological stage was pT1bN2M0 stage IIIA. Genomic analysis revealed an EGFR mutation. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed a programmed death-ligand 1 tumor proportion score of < 1%. The patient was under watchful observation without adjuvant chemotherapy. Multiple mediastinal and right hilar lymph node metastases were found in February 2018. Radiation therapy at a total dose of 60.0 Gy distributed in 30 fractions was performed over a period of 6 weeks. A computed tomography (CT) scan performed 6 weeks after irradiation therapy showed a reduction in lymph node metastases. However, left hilar and right supraclavicular lymph node metastases and multiple pulmonary metastases were newly observed outside of the irradiation field. A CT scan performed 6 weeks later showed a dramatic complete disappearance of the previously observed pulmonary metastases. No chemotherapy was administered during the period. Conclusion This was a case of abscopal effect: irradiation of the mediastinum resulted in the disappearance of multiple pulmonary metastases in both lungs.
Purpose The present study examined the efficacy and complications associated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for optic nerve sheath meningioma (ONSM) in 15 cases and compared visual function before and after treatment. Methods Consecutively diagnosed patients with ONSM treated with IMRT were evaluated from 2012 to 2017. We categorized ONSM with three growth patterns (diffuse, fusiform, or globular). Visual acuity, visual fields, and optic disc findings were assessed before and after IMRT. Ocular and systemic complications were evaluated during and after treatment. Results The 15 patients selected for analysis ranged in age from 33 to 77 years. Post-treatment observation periods were 8 to 57 months. After IMRT, tumor enlargement was not detected in any eyes, and tumor reduction was seen in 2 eyes. At final posttreatment follow-up, eyes with fusiform and globular growth maintained better visual acuity compared with pre-treatment, whereas 2 of 5 eyes with diffuse growth showed reduced vision. Five eyes with no apparent optic disc abnormality maintained better visual acuity compared with pre-treatment, whereas 8 of 10 eyes with disc edema and atrophy remained stable or showed reduced vision. Improvements were seen in all 5 eyes with optic discs negative for pre-treatment abnormalities. Final posttreatment visual field abnormalities improved in 11 eyes. All adverse events identified during IMRT improved rapidly during the treatment period. Conclusion IMRT for the treatment of ONSM achieved improvement and preserved visual function. In particular, early treatment with IMRT before the appearance of optic disc abnormalities can be more effective for improving visual function.
Calorie restriction is known to influence several physiological processes and to alleviate the late effects of radiation exposure such as neoplasm induction and life shortening. However, earlier related studies were limited to acute radiation exposure. Therefore, in this study we examined the influence of chronic low-dose-rate irradiation on lifespan. Young male B6C3F1/Jcl mice were divided randomly into two groups, which were fed either a low-calorie (65 kcal/ week) or high-calorie (95 kcal/week) diet. The latter is comparable to ad libitum feeding. The animals in the irradiated group were continuously exposed to gamma rays for 400 days at 20 mGy/day, resulting in a total dose of 8 Gy. Exposure and calorie restriction were initiated at 8 weeks of age and the diets were maintained for life. The life-shortening effects from chronic whole-body irradiation were compared between the groups. Body weights were reduced in calorierestricted mice irrespective of radiation treatment. Radiation induced a shortened median lifespan in both groups, but to a greater extent in the calorie-restricted mice. These results suggest that calorie restriction may sensitize mice to chronic low-dose-rate radiation exposure to produce a life-shortening effect rather than alleviating the effects of radiation.
Purpose To assess the outcomes of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy and hypofractionated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) combined with long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in very-high-risk (VHR) versus high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa), as defined in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria. Methods Data from 338 consecutive HR or VHR PCa patients who had undergone this tri-modal therapy between 2005 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free, progression-free, overall, and cancer-specific survival (BCRFS/PFS/OS/CSS) rates were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Wilcoxon test. Cox regression models were used to evaluate candidate prognostic factors for survival. C‑indexes were used to assess model discrimination. Results Within a median follow-up of 84 months, 68 patients experienced BCR, 58 had disease progression including only 3 with local progression, 27 died of any cause, and 2 died from PCa. The 5‑year BCRFS, PFS, OS, and CSS rates were 82.2% (HR 86.5%; VHR 70.0%), 90.0% (HR 94.3%; VHR 77.6%), 95.7% (HR, 97.1%; VHR, 91.8%), and 99.6% (HR, 100%; VHR, 98.0%), respectively. In multivariable analyses that adjusted for standard clinicopathologic features, the risk subclassification was associated both PFS and OS (p = 0.0003 and 0.001, respectively). Adding the risk subclassification improved the accuracy of models in predicting BCRFS, PFS, and OS. Conclusion While the outcome of this trimodal approach appears favorable, VHR PCa patients had significantly worse oncological outcomes than those with HR PCa. The NCCN risk subclassification should be integrated into prognostic tools to guide risk stratification, treatment, and follow-up for unfavorable PCa patients receiving this trimodal therapy.
Purpose Few studies have documented the long‐term oncological outcomes of favorable and unfavorable intermediate‐risk (IR) prostate cancer patients treated via contemporary high‐dose irradiation. We analyzed the ultimate clinical outcomes of such patients using the current risk sub‐stratification schema. Patients and Methods We included 693 patients with localized IR prostate cancer treated via low‐dose‐rate brachytherapy (LDR‐BT) with or without external beam radiation (EBRT) and with or without androgen‐deprivation therapy (ADT) in a single institution. Treatment outcomes (biochemical recurrence‐free survival [BCRFS] and clinical progression‐free survival [CPFS]) were compared according to the numbers of unfavorable findings. Results Out of the 693 IR patients, 292 (42.1%) exhibited favorable disease; the remaining 401 (57.9%) exhibited unfavorable disease. Compared with favorable IR status, unfavorable IR status was associated with shorter BCRFS and CPFS (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Patients with two to three unfavorable factors experienced the worst oncological outcomes (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Although patients with one or no unfavorable factors responded similarly to LDR‐BT monotherapy, this treatment modality was insufficient for preventing biochemical and clinical progression in patients with multiple unfavorable findings. Conclusion Long‐term treatment outcomes indicate that patients with IR disease scheduled for LDR‐BT should undergo multimodal irradiation if they exhibit two or more unfavorable factors at diagnosis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.