Residues of 37 polar veterinary drugs belonging to six families (quinolones, tetracyclines, macrolides, lincosamides, sulfonamides, and others) in livestock and fishery products were determined using a validated LC-MS/MS method. There were two key points in sample preparation. First, extraction was performed with two solutions of different polarity. Highly polar compounds were initially extracted with Na2EDTA-McIlvaine's buffer (pH 7.0). Medium polar compounds were then extracted from the same samples with acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid. Secondly, cleanup was performed using a single SPE polymer cartridge. The first extracted solution was applied to the cartridge. Highly polar compounds were retained on the cartridge. Then, the second extracted solution was applied to the same cartridge. Both highly and medium polar compounds were eluted from the cartridge. This method satisfied the guideline criteria for 37 out of 37 drugs in swine muscle, chicken muscle, bovine muscle, prawn, salmon trout, red sea bream, milk, and honey; 35 out of 37 in egg; and 34 out of 37 in flounder. The LOQ ranged from 0.1 to 5 μg/kg. Residues were detected in 24 out of 110 samples and analyzed using the validated method.
A simple and accurate analytical method for the determination of acaricides in honey was developed and validated in accordance with Japanese validation guidelines. Analytes - amitraz, N-2,4-dimethylphenyl-N-methylformamidine (DMPF), etoxazole, fenpyroximate, fipronil, hexythiazox, propargite, pyridaben and spirodiclofen - were extracted with ethyl acetate under basic conditions and subsequently cleaned up using an InertSep(®) MA-1 polymer-based anion-exchange column. The method was validated by fortified recovery tests at three different concentrations (1, 5 and 10 µg kg(-1)) performed with three samples daily on five different days. The method exhibited recoveries of 77-116% and precision (relative standard deviations - RSDs) of repeatability and within-laboratory reproducibility ranged from 2% to 22% and from 3% to 23%, respectively. The sample solution was successfully cleaned up to enable quantification using external solvent calibration curves. The limits of quantification (LOQs) were estimated to be 1 µg kg(-1) for all analytes. The method was applied to honey samples commercially available in Tokyo, Japan. Analysis of 250 honey samples indicated that amitraz was present in 127 samples, and that its residual concentration was less than 20 µg kg(-1). Propargite was detected in 23 samples at concentrations less than 1 µg kg(-1).
A simple analytical method for the determination of hydrocortisone and progesterone in bovine, swine, and chicken muscle and eggs was developed. Hydrocortisone and progesterone were extracted with acetonitrile and subsequently cleaned-up using an Oasis HLB mini-cartridge. The method was validated in accordance with Japanese guidelines and exhibited trueness from 86.6% to 104.3% and precision (relative standard deviations (RSDs) of repeatability and within reproducibility were under 8.7% and 11.7%, respectively). The method was applied to 103 bovine muscle, 137 swine muscle, 69 chicken muscle and 52 egg samples that were commercially available in Tokyo, Japan. The hydrocortisone concentration was 0.9-41.2 µg kg(-1) in all bovine muscle samples, with an average of 7.7 µg kg(-1) and a median of 6.2 µg kg(-1). The progesterone concentration in 50 samples exceeded the limit of quantification (LOQ) and reached a maximum of 95.4 µg kg(-1). Hydrocortisone was also detected in all swine muscle samples at concentrations of 2.0-56.0 µg kg(-1). Its average and median concentrations amounted to 13.1 and 11.3 µg kg(-1), respectively. Twenty-three samples contained progesterone levels surpassing the LOQ, with a maximum concentration of 107.0 µg kg(-1). No chicken muscle samples contained any of the analytes. The progesterone concentration was 15.5-200.0 µg kg(-1) in all egg samples, with an average of 95.4 µg kg(-1) and a median of 90.5 µg kg(-1).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.