In future studies, our primers have the potential to provide valuable information on genetic diversity, genetic structure, and on historical and recent gene flow in S. cossonii; they should also enable related research in other Scorpidium species.
As ploidy level and mating system can affect genetic diversity and differentiation, we conducted population genetic analyses of two closely related mosses, Scorpidium cossonii (Schimp.) Hedenä s, and S. revolvens (Sw. ex Anonymo) Rubers which differ in ploidy level and sexual system. We collected 315 specimens in total from five populations of S. cossonii and four populations of S. revolvens in the Swiss Alps. Ploidy level, genetic diversity within populations, and genetic differentiation between populations and species were estimated using nine microsatellite markers. In each S. cossonii sample, each locus bore only one allele, while in S. revolvens, seven out of the nine loci were fixed or nearly fixed for two alleles per locus per individual. These findings are consistent with a gametophytic haploid S. cossonii and allodiploid S. revolvens. The haploid and dioicous S. cossonii was genetically more diverse than the (allo)diploid and monoicous S. revolvens. Differences in genetic diversity between the two species may be explained by different mating systems, different population sizes, and different population histories. Genetic differentiation among populations of S. cossonii was higher than among those of S. revolvens. The low genetic differentiation among populations of the monoicous species was not unexpected, since monoicous species frequently produce sporophytes, long-distance spore dispersal is more likely and leads to low differentiation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.