Abstract. Bladder cancer, the majority of which is urothelial carcinoma (UC), is a common malignancy worldwide. Genes encoding transmembrane/secretory proteins expressed specifically in certain cancers may be ideal biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and may represent therapeutic targets. In the present study, the expression and function of the bone marrow stromal cell antigen 2 (BST2) gene was analyzed in UC. Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction demonstrated that expression of BST2 in normal tissue samples was the highest in liver tissue. However, expression of BST2 in UC tissue samples was higher than in normal liver. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed weak or no staining of BST-2 in non-neoplastic mucosa, whereas UC tissue exhibited stronger and more extensive staining compared with non-neoplastic mucosa. BST-2 staining was observed mainly on UC cell membranes. In total, 28 (41%) of 69 UC cases were positive for BST-2. UC cases positive for BST-2 were more frequently T2/3/4 cases [so-called muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC)] than Ta/is/1 cases (P=0.0001). However, Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no association between BST-2 expression and survival. BST2 small interfering RNA (siRNA)-transfected T24 cells exhibited significantly reduced cell growth relative to negative control siRNA-transfected T24 cells. The levels of phosphorylated Akt and extracellular signal-regulated kinase were lower in BST2 siRNA-transfected T24 cells than in control cells. These results suggest the involvement of BST-2 in the pathogenesis of UC. Since BST-2 is expressed on the cell membrane, BST-2 may be a good therapeutic target for MIBC.
Soluble programmed death-ligand 1 (sPD-L1) levels can be used as a biomarker for gastric cancer (GC). However, comprehensive information regarding the sPD-L1 expression profiles and their association with cachexia in GC is lacking. Therefore, the present study evaluated the association between clinicopathological findings and sPD-L1 levels in patients with GC. Serum samples were collected from patients with GC during their first visit to Department of Esophageal-Gastro-Intestinal Surgery, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan (January 2012-December 2017; n=173), and sPD-L1 levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Survival rates among 116 patients, excluding cases with preoperative chemotherapy or no radical procedures, were analyzed. sPD-L1 levels were associated with factors such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, hemoglobin (Hb) and albumin (Alb) levels, total cholesterol and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and related to inflammation and nutrition in patients. Notably, the higher the number of applicable indicators related to cachexia (Hb <12 g/dl, Alb <3.2 g/dl, CRP >0.5 mg/dl and low body mass index) was, the higher the sPD-L1 value was. However, the pathological stage did not significantly differ between the groups. Clinicopathologically, there was no association with tumor depth, lymph node metastasis or vascular invasion; however, patients with the intestinal type had significantly higher sPD-L1 levels than patients with the diffuse type (P=0.032; Wilcoxon test). The overall survival did not significantly differ between the groups with low and high sPD-L1 levels; however, among patients who received radical treatment, the relapse-free survival was significantly worse in the high-sPD-L1-level group than in the low-sPD-L1-level group (P=0.025; log-rank test). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that a high sPD-L1 concentration was a sign of poor prognosis, independent of pathological stage and cancer antigen CA19-9 (P=0.0029). Therefore, the present findings suggest that sPD-L1 can reflect cachexia status in patients with GC and may serve as a prognostic marker for relapse-free survival after radical GC surgery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.