OBJECTIVE An increasing number of human in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have focused on examining the structure and function of the subfields of the hippocampal formation (the dentate gyrus, CA fields 1–3, and the subiculum) and subregions of the parahippocampal gyrus (entorhinal, perirhinal, and parahippocampal cortices). The ability to interpret the results of such studies and to relate them to each other would be improved if a common standard existed for labeling hippocampal subfields and parahippocampal subregions. Currently, research groups label different subsets of structures and use different rules, landmarks, and cues to define their anatomical extents. This paper characterizes, both qualitatively and quantitatively, the variability in the existing manual segmentation protocols for labeling hippocampal and parahippocampal substructures in MRI, with the goal of guiding subsequent work on developing a harmonized substructure segmentation protocol. METHOD MRI scans of a single healthy adult human subject were acquired both at 3 Tesla and 7 Tesla. Representatives from 21 research groups applied their respective manual segmentation protocols to the MRI modalities of their choice. The resulting set of 21 segmentations was analyzed in a common anatomical space to quantify similarity and identify areas of agreement. RESULTS The differences between the 21 protocols include the region within which segmentation is performed, the set of anatomical labels used, and the extents of specific anatomical labels. The greatest overall disagreement among the protocols is at the CA1/subiculum boundary, and disagreement across all structures is greatest in the anterior portion of the hippocampal formation relative to the body and tail. CONCLUSIONS The combined examination of the 21 protocols in the same dataset suggests possible strategies towards developing a harmonized subfield segmentation protocol and facilitates comparison between published studies.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The functional role of the hippocampal formation in episodic memory has been studied using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) for many years. The hippocampus can be segmented into three major anteroposterior sections, called head, body and tail, and into the Cornu Ammonis (CA), dentate gyrus (DG), and subiculum (Sub) subfields based on its transverse axis. However, the exact role of these subregions and subfields in memory processes is less understood. In the present study we combined ultra-high resolution structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at 4.7 T with an event-related high-resolution fMRI paradigm based on the 'Designs' subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale to investigate how the hippocampal subfields and longitudinal subregions are involved in encoding and retrieval of item, spatial, and associative memories. Our results showed that during memory encoding, regardless of the type of memory being learned, all subregions and all subfields were active. During the retrieval phase, on the other hand, we observed an anterior to posterior gradient in hippocampal activity for all subfields and all types of memory. Our findings also confirmed presence of an anterior to posterior gradient in hippocampal activity during spatial learning. Comparing subfield activities to each other revealed that the DG was more active than the CA1-3 and Sub during both encoding and retrieval. Finally, our results showed that for every subfield, encoding vs. retrieval activity differences were larger in the hippocampal head than in the hippocampal body and tail. Furthermore, these encoding vs. retrieval activity differences were similar in all subfields, highlighting the importance of studying both the longitudinal and transverse axis specialization simultaneously. Current findings further elucidate the structure-function relationship between the human hippocampus and episodic memory. Highlights• Hippocampus responded similarly during item, spatial, and associative learning • The entire hippocampus was active during memory encoding• Retrieval activity was characterized by an anterior to posterior gradient • Dentate gyrus showed the largest BOLD activity during both encoding and retrieval• Both the longitudinal and transverse properties characterize hippocampal function