Osteoporosis (OP) is a systemic bone disease caused by various factors, including, the decrease of bone density and quality, the destruction of bone microstructure, and the increase of bone fragility. It is a disease with a high incidence in a large proportion of the world’s elderly population. However, osteoporosis lacks obvious symptoms and sensitive biomarkers. Therefore, it is extremely urgent to discover and identify disease-related biomarkers for early clinical diagnosis and effective intervention for osteoporosis. In our study, the Linear Models for Microarray Data (LIMMA) tool was used to screen differential expressed genes from transcriptome sequencing data of OP blood samples downloaded from the GEO database, and cluster Profiler was used for enriching analysis of differently expressed genes. In order to analyzed the relevance of gene modules, clinical symptoms, and the most related module setting genes associated with disease progression, we adapted Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) to screen and analyze the related pathways and relevant molecules. We used the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) database to construct protein interaction network of key modules, and Cytoscape software was used to complete network visualization and screen of core genes in the network. Various plug-in algorithms of cytoHubba were used to identify key genes of OP. Finally, correlation analysis and single-gene gene probe concentration analysis (GSEA) analysis were performed for each core gene. Results of a total of 8 key genes that were closely related to the occurrence and development of OP were screened out, which provided a brand-new idea for the clinical diagnosis and early prevention of OP. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed for validation, the expression levels of CUL1, PTEN and STAT1 genes in the OS group were significantly higher than in the non-OS groups. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that CUL1, PTEN and STAT1 displayed considerable diagnostic accuracy for OS.

No abstract

BackgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is an age-associated malignancy with high morbidity and mortality rate, posing a severe threat to public health. Cellular senescence, a specialized cell cycle arrest form, results in the secretion of various inflammatory mediators. In recent studies, senescence has shown an essential role in tumorigenesis and tumor development, yet the extensive effects of senescence in PCa have not been systematically investigated. Here, we aimed to develop a feasible senescence-associated prognosis model for early identification and appropriate management in patients with PCa.MethodThe RNA sequence results and clinical information available from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and a list of experimentally validated senescence-related genes (SRGs) from the CellAge database were first obtained. Then, a senescence-risk signature related with prognosis was constructed using univariate Cox and LASSO regression analysis. We calculated the risk score of each patient and divided them into high-risk and low-risk groups in terms of the median value. Furthermore, two datasets (GSE70770 and GSE46602) were used to assess the effects of the risk model. A nomogram was built by integrating the risk score and clinical characteristics, which was further verified using ROC curves and calibrations. Finally, we compared the differences in the tumor microenvironment (TME) landscape, drug susceptibility, and the functional enrichment among the different risk groups.ResultsWe established a unique prognostic signature in PCa patients based on eight SRGs, including CENPA, ADCK5, FOXM1, TFAP4, MAPK, LGALS3, BAG3, and NOX4, and validated well prognosis-predictive power in independent datasets. The risk model was associated with age and TNM staging, and the calibration chart presented a high consistency in nomogram prediction. Additionally, the prognostic signature could serve as an independent prediction factor due to its high accuracy. Notably, we found that the risk score was positively associated with tumor mutation burden (TMB) and immune checkpoint, whereas negatively correlated with tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE), suggesting that these patients with risk scores were more sensitive to immunotherapy. Drug susceptibility analysis revealed differences in the responses to general drugs (docetaxel, cyclophosphamide, 5-Fluorouracil, cisplatin, paclitaxel, and vincristine) were yielded between the two risk groups.ConclusionIdentifying the SRG-score signature may become a promising method for predicting the prognosis of patients with PCa and tailoring appropriate treatment strategies.