This study sought to provide a better understanding of how lecture capture technology is used by students and how its use is related to student satisfaction, attendance, and academic performance. Using a mixed method design with both quantitative and qualitative methods to collect data, instruments included a student questionnaire, interviews and focus groups, lecture capture usage statistics, and grades. Results showed that 63% of students were satisfied with lecture capture and 75% of students indicated that it had facilitated their learning. Students primarily used the recordings to learn what they had missed while in class (79%) or because they were absent (72%). 70% of students reported having watched at least 50% of the recorded material (27% watched all the material), and only 8% of students did not view any recordings. Student satisfaction had a significant positive relationship with the number of lectures viewed. In regards to attendance, the self-reported data from students indicated that 61% of students did not miss classes (none or just one class). Students with the greatest number of missed classes viewed the recordings more frequently. As for student achievement, 68% of students indicated that lecture capture helped them to achieve better grades. Students with lower course marks accessed the recordings more frequently than those with higher marks. Instructor perceptions were that lecture capture predominately helped average to below average students achieve slightly better marks, but had less of an impact on the grades for particularly low and high achieving students. Cette étude avait pour but de fournir une meilleure compréhension de la manière dont la capture de cours en vidéo est utilisée par les étudiants et comment son utilisation est reliée à la satisfaction des étudiants, à leur assiduité et à leurs résultats académiques. Grâce à un concept de méthodes mixtes comprenant des méthodes quantitatives et qualitatives pour recueillir les données, les instruments incluaient un questionnaire à remplir par les étudiants, des entrevues et des groupes de discussion, des statistiques sur l’emploi de la capture de cours, ainsi que des notes. Les résultats ont indiqué que 63 % des étudiants étaient satisfaits de la capture de cours et 75 % d’entre eux ont pensé que cette méthode avait favorisé leur apprentissage. Les étudiants ont principalement utilisé les enregistrements pour apprendre ce qu’ils avaient manqué quand ils étaient en classe (79 %) ou parce qu’ils étaient absents (72 %). Soixante-dix pour cent des étudiants ont indiqué qu’ils avaient regardé au moins 50 % des enregistrements (27 % avaient regardé toutes les vidéos) et seulement 8 % des étudiants n’avaient regardé aucune vidéo. La satisfaction des étudiants a eu une incidence positive importante en fonction du nombre de vidéos visionnées. En ce qui concerne l’assiduité, les données auto-déclarées par les étudiants ont indiqué que 61 % des étudiants n’avaient pas manqué de classes (aucune absence ou seulement une absence). Les étudiants qui avaient le plus grand nombre d’absences avaient regardé les vidéos plus fréquemment. En ce qui concerne les résultats des étudiants, 68 % d’entre eux ont indiqué que la capture de cours les avait aidés à obtenir de meilleures notes. Les étudiants qui avaient obtenu les notes de cours les plus basses avaient regardé les vidéos plus fréquemment que ceux qui avaient obtenu des notes plus élevées. Les instructeurs ont déclaré que la capture de cours en vidéo avait surtout aidé les étudiants de niveau moyen ou inférieur à la moyenne à obtenir des notes un peu meilleures, mais qu’elle avait eu un effet moins important sur les notes des étudiants très peu performants ou sur celles des étudiants très performants.
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate the factorial structure underlying the French Self-Perception Profile for Children (SPPC). The factorial validity of the five domain-specific subscales-scholastic competence, social acceptance, athletic competence, physical appearance, and behavioral conduct-was tested for 225 4th-grade, 272 5th-grade, and 282 6th-grade children in Ottawa. That the initially hypothesized CFA models were not validated led to post hoc model fitting to establish a final and a baseline model for each grade-level cohort. Final models were rejected in favor of more parsimonious baseline models for the 4th-, 5th-, and 6th-grade cohorts. Internal consistency and item reliability values raised some questions about the reliability of scores on the measure across grade levels. Overall, considering the stringency of the LISREL 7 program, the French SPPC demonstrated reasonably sound psychometric properties.
Résumé Cet article porte sur les effets à moyen terme d’un programme offert à temps plein à des enfants de quatre ans. Nous avons comparé 273 élèves de 2e année du primaire à un groupe de 300 élèves qui n’en ont pas bénéficié. Les résultats indiquent que le programme a eu un effet positif sur le langage et la lecture, mais pas sur l’écriture. De plus, nous avons noté une performance plus faible en mathématiques et une fréquence plus faible des comportements prosociaux et scolaires chez les enfants à temps plein.
Although comprehensive and ecological approaches to early childhood prevention are commonly advocated, there are few examples of long-term follow-up of such programs. In this monograph, we investigate the medium- and long-term effects of an ecological, community-based prevention project for primary school children and families living in three economically disadvantaged neighborhoods in Ontario, Canada. The Better Beginnings, Better Futures (BBBF) project is one of the most ambitious Canadian research projects on the long-term impacts of early childhood prevention programming to date. Bronfenbrenner's ecological model of human development informed program planning, implementation, and evaluation. Using a quasi-experimental design, the BBBF longitudinal research study involved 601 children and their families who participated in BBBF programs when children were between 4 and 8 years old and 358 children and their families from sociodemographically matched comparison communities. We collected extensive child, parent, family, and community outcome data when children were in Grade 3 (age 8–9), Grade 6 (age 11–12), and Grade 9 (age 14–15). The BBBF mandate was to develop programs that would positively impact all areas of child's development; our findings reflect this ecological approach. We found marked positive effects in social and school functioning domains in Grades 6 and 9 and evidence of fewer emotional and behavioral problems in school across the three grades. Parents from BBBF sites reported greater feelings of social support and more positive ratings of marital satisfaction and general family functioning, especially at the Grade 9 follow-up. Positive neighborhood-level effects were also evident. Economic analyses at Grade 9 showed BBBF participation was associated with government savings of $912 per child. These findings provide evidence that an affordable, ecological, community-based prevention program can promote long-term development of children living in disadvantaged neighborhoods and produce monetary benefits to government as soon as 7 years after program completion.
At one of Ontario’s largest universities, the University of Ottawa, course evaluations involve about 6,000 course sections and over 43,000 students every year. This paper-based format requires over 1,000,000 sheets of paper, 20,000 envelopes, and the support of dozens of administrative staff members. To examine the impact of a shift to an online system for the evaluation of courses, the following study sought to compare participation rates and evaluation scores of an online and paper-based course evaluation system. Results from a pilot group of 10,417 students registered in 318 courses suggest an average decrease in participation rate of 12–15% when using an online system. No significant differences in evaluation scores were observed. Instructors and students alike shared positive reviews about the online system; however, they suggested that an in-class period be maintained for the electronic completion of course evaluations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.