No abstract

The purpose of this study was to implement a new method for assessing the ventilatory thresholds from heart rate variability (HRV) analysis. ECG, VO2, VCO2, and VE were collected from eleven well-trained subjects during an incremental exhaustive test performed on a cycle ergometer. The "Short-Term Fourier Transform" analysis was applied to RR time series to compute the high frequency HRV energy (HF, frequency range: 0.15 - 2 Hz) and HF frequency peak (fHF) vs. power stages. For all subjects, visual examination of ventilatory equivalents, fHF, and instantaneous HF energy multiplied by fHF (HF.fHF) showed two nonlinear increases. The first nonlinear increase corresponded to the first ventilatory threshold (VT1) and was associated with the first HF threshold (T(RSA1) from fHF and HFT1 from HF.fHF detection). The second nonlinear increase represented the second ventilatory threshold (VT2) and was associated with the second HF threshold (T(RSA2) from fHF and HFT2 from HF.fHF detection). HFT1 , T(RSA1), HFT2, and T(RSA2) were, respectively, not significantly different from VT1 (VT1 = 219 +/- 45 vs. HFT1 = 220 +/- 48 W, p = 0.975; VT1 vs. T(RSA1) = 213 +/- 56 W, p = 0.662) and VT2 (VT2 = 293 +/- 45 vs. HFT2 = 294 +/- - 48 W, p = 0.956; vs. T(RSA2) = 300 +/- 58 W, p = 0.445). In addition, when expressed as a function of power, HFT1, T(RSA1), HFT2, and T(RSA2) were respectively correlated with VT1 (with HFT1 r2 = 0.94, p < 0.001; with T(RSA1) r2 = 0.48, p < 0.05) and VT2 (with HFT2 r2 = 0.97, p < 0.001; with T(RSA2 )r2 = 0.79, p < 0.001). This study confirms that ventilatory thresholds can be determined from RR time series using HRV time-frequency analysis in healthy well-trained subjects. In addition it shows that HF.fHF provides a more reliable and accurate index than fHF alone for this assessment.

The degree of control of blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) by arterial baroreflex during exercise is still controversial. We studied baroreflex control of BP and HR in seven normal young men by a noninvasive procedure employing a neck suction chamber that delivers pulsatile positive and negative pressures to the carotid sinus (CS). Pressures applied to the CS ranged from -80 to +60 Torr in steps of 20 Torr. Pressure stimuli were triggered by electrocardiogram R wave, and each pressure step was maintained for 20 s in a continuous sequence. One baroreflex-response curve was obtained during the last 3 min of each 6-min period of exercise. The four levels of upright (cycle) exercise were 60, 120, 180, and 240 W, the highest requiring approximately 75% of maximal O2 uptake. The sensitivity of the HR baroreflex response assessed by linear regression of HR vs. CS pressure (CSP) did not significantly decrease from rest (-0.09 +/- 0.053 beat/Torr) to 240 W (-0.06 +/- 0.025 beat/Torr). The BP above or below which CSP was increased or decreased by neck collar pressure was significantly increased from rest (76 +/- 6.5 Torr) to 240 W (111.2 +/- 4.0 Torr). The sensitivity of baroreflex response was assessed by linear regression of BP vs. CSP and was not significantly different from rest (-0.29 +/- 0.054 Torr/Torr) up to exercise at 240 W (-0.29 +/- 0.048 Torr/Torr). We conclude that mild to severe exercise does not reduce the gain of the CS reflex below resting values.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)