The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of interferon-a (IFN-a) therapy of chronic hepatitis B, C and D (HBV, HCV and HDV, respectively) in renal transplant recipients. A group of 42 patients (30 males, 12 females, mean age 38 years) with documented viraemia and chronic active hepatitis (CAH) were studied, of whom 1 had HBV infection alone, 11 had HCV infection alone, 3 had HBV and HDV infection concomitantly, 12 had HBV and HCV infection concomitantly, and 2 had HBV, HCV and HDV infection concomitantly. Patients received 3 MU IFNa three times weekly for 6 months. After IFN-a therapy, 18 patients (43 %) achieved normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity and a partial response was observed in 12 (29%) patients. Two patients relapsed (one with HCV and one with HBV + HCV infection) immediately after the cessation of IFN-a therapy. Repeated liver biopsy was performed in 16 patients after 6-24 months of therapy and revealed progression to cirrhosis in five patients, remission in two and stable disease in nine. None o f the patients cleared HCV RNA, four patients cleared HBeAg (two also HDV), and one both HBV and HCV Five patients died during IFN-a therapy (one as a consequence of liver failure), and four died during the 6 months after therapy (two as a consequence of liver failure). During IFN-a therapy renal allograft function remained stable in 31 patients and acute rejection episodes occurred in 7, of whom 5 lost their graft and all had experienced rejection episodes before. In 16 patients normalization of ALT continued during long-term follow-up (median 22 months, range 0-84 months). IFN-a seemed to be moderately effective in the treatment of chronic HBV or HCV infections, but cannot be recommended for recipients infected with both HBV and HCV.
We evaluated the effects of treatment with interferon (IFN) on liver disease and renal allograft function in ten immunosuppressed cadaver kidney recipients. Two females and eight males (mean age 39 years) with biopsy-proven chronic active hepatitis (n = 8) or persistent hepatitis (n = 2) and serum positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBe antigen (n = 5) or serum positive for anti-HCV antibodies (n = 3) or serum positive for HBsAg, anti-HCV and anti-HDV antibodies (n = 2) received 3 million units IFN thrice weekly of 6 months. All patients responded with a reduction in serum aminotransferase activity and in five of them liver function completely normalized. Three patients among five infected with HBV cleared HBeAg. During the follow-up period liver function remained stable in 9 patients after discontinuation of IFN therapy. Three patients lost their grafts due to rejection 1, 2, and 4 months after IFN therapy, respectively. In six patients renal function remained stable during and after IFN therapy. We conclude that in selected groups of renal allograft recipients IFN can be used safely and effectively for the treatment of chronic viral hepatitis.
Fifty cases of idiopathic membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis were followed up for an average of 10 +/- 0.9 (SE) years. Forty of them, who presented a nephrotic syndrome, were treated by immunosuppressive drugs (prednisone, azathioprine, chlorambucil, cyclophosphamide) for 79 +/- 9.7 (SE) months. Cumulative survival ratio for 5, 10 and 15 years after enrollment was 0.90, 0.82 and 0.77 and after appearance of first symptoms or signs of kidney disease as determined by anamnestic data 0.97, 0.91 and 0.90 accordingly. Triple-drug therapy (prednisone and azathioprine combined with chlorambucil or cyclophosphamide) was more effective in improving proteinuria than other immunosuppressive regimens. No serious side effects were encountered.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.