This paper argues that deepening commodification in Turkish agriculture has changed the lives of farmers in significant ways. Global circuits have swept away the accustomed networks of information, production and marketing which had been largely established and maintained by comprehensive governmental support policies. New institutions have come into the picture establishing the links between small producers and larger markets. With state policy strengthening the domination of the market, prices and demand patterns fluctuate widely leaving small producers vulnerable to market forces and raising the level of risk and insecurity. This situation brings about a rapid de‐ruralization of the population in most regions of the country. In the fertile coastal strip of the southern and western provinces, however, commercial opportunities introduced by global circuits have led to a thriving market in products, land, and labour. Farming of vegetables and fruits for domestic and European markets dominate agricultural production. Seasonal employment, in tourism and in labour‐intensive crops, supplement household incomes, permitting the rural population to remain in the countryside.

No abstract

Alongside the emergence of a new breed of chefs from diverse social and culinary backgrounds in Istanbul during the last two decades, new culinary interpretations and appropriations are appearing with regard to what is signified by authenticity in culinary products and practices. Here localism unfolds as the main trend and theme. This tendency is further strengthened by the formation of a new political economy of taste in Istanbul, which is defined by a double movement. On the one hand, there is a nascent transition in culinary work from craftsmanship to a more specialized professionalism, a process that invokes significant economic and social tensions. On the other, a new eating public is emerging, a more cosmopolitan foodie group, with more ambition, desire, and motivation to try culinary products that are out of the ordinary.

No abstract

This Fall 2016 issue of New Perspectives on Turkey is an open issue, yet a common concern runs through all five of the research articles published here in No. 55. We might claim that the authors are all concerned with the contradictions, paradoxes, and social consequences of the exercise of state power in spheres ranging from law to economic, social, and foreign policy, all as refracted through the prism of contemporary Turkish politics. We feature two articles on the implementation of exceptional executive powers and their legal underpinnings in the late nineteenth century and the first half of the twentieth century. Noémi Lévy-Aksu's essay on the idare-i örfiyye (state of siege) during the first constitutional period in the late nineteenth century discusses how the Ottomans created a legal tool of government for exceptional (and non-exceptional) times by taking advantage of various legal sources, including the French état de siège, as well as of the political context of the early Hamidian reign. Moving into republican times, Joakim Parslow's article on theories of exceptional executive powers between 1933 and 1945 focuses on the fashioning of a legal system that dispersed emergency powers across various statutes, temporary laws, regulations, and decrees. Legal theoreticians of the period sought to normalize this contradictory and haphazard system by integrating prerogative into ordinary legality, rather than defending the rule of law. Since 1960, long episodes of martial law and states of emergency have characterized the aftermaths of military takeovers; currently, following the failed coup attempt of July 15, 2016, the country is once more being governed according to state of emergency decrees. Lévy-Aksu and Parslow's studies on exceptional executive powers are therefore very timely for thinking about the legal and political lineages of the current state of affairs in Turkey. During a period of heightened authoritarianism that has culminated in a state of emergency, the ruling Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, AKP) has also utilized an ever intensifying populism, even while deepening neoliberal policies. The remaining three articles in this issue demonstrate this observation from areas as diverse as social policy, investments, and foreign policy. Tim Dorlach's article is a study of the sudden change that occurred in 2009 in the government's pharmaceutical expenditure policy. Despite its neoliberal bent, the government, instead of privatizing the cost of medicines, forced national and international pharmaceutical producers to lower their prices, and thus reduce their profit margins, by introducing a global budget on public