Installation of mobile phone base stations in residential areas has initiated public debate about possible adverse effects on human health. This study aimed to determine the association of exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic field radiation (RF-EMFR) generated by mobile phone base stations with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and occurrence of type 2 diabetes mellitus. For this study, two different elementary schools (school-1 and school-2) were selected. We recruited 159 students in total; 96 male students from school-1, with age range 12–16 years, and 63 male students with age range 12–17 years from school-2. Mobile phone base stations with towers existed about 200 m away from the school buildings. RF-EMFR was measured inside both schools. In school-1, RF-EMFR was 9.601 nW/cm2 at frequency of 925 MHz, and students had been exposed to RF-EMFR for a duration of 6 h daily, five days in a week. In school-2, RF-EMFR was 1.909 nW/cm2 at frequency of 925 MHz and students had been exposed for 6 h daily, five days in a week. 5–6 mL blood was collected from all the students and HbA1c was measured by using a Dimension Xpand Plus Integrated Chemistry System, Siemens. The mean HbA1c for the students who were exposed to high RF-EMFR was significantly higher (5.44 ± 0.22) than the mean HbA1c for the students who were exposed to low RF-EMFR (5.32 ± 0.34) (p = 0.007). Moreover, students who were exposed to high RF-EMFR generated by MPBS had a significantly higher risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (p = 0.016) relative to their counterparts who were exposed to low RF-EMFR. It is concluded that exposure to high RF-EMFR generated by MPBS is associated with elevated levels of HbA1c and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Objectives Communication between physicians and parents is the cornerstone of their relationship to reach a common goal of better child health. To deliver proper communication, a physician needs to learn certain skills that are not included in the curriculum of medical schools or paediatrics residency training in KSA. This study probed the physicians' attitude towards their styles of communication based on the parents' perception. Methods The data were collected from a randomly selected sample of physicians and parents from general paediatrics wards at King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), Riyadh, KSA. We used a validated Criteria Cognitive Aptitude Test (CAT-T) questionnaire and a translated version of the CAT-T questionnaire for the physicians and parents, respectively. The data were then analyzed using variable qualitative and quantitative statistical methods. Results The data were collected from 63 physicians and 100 parents in the pediatric wards at KSUMC. We observed an increased level of confidence in communication skills (CS) among experienced physicians, while young physicians expressed concerns regarding their communication with parents concerning decision-making. The parents rated the physicians' skill of active listening as poor. However, the parents rated the physicians' introduction as higher than their own self-rating. In addition, the parents' satisfaction with the physicians' CS was inversely related to the parents' level of education. Conclusion Our data suggests a clear discrepancy between the physicians' insights and the parents' perceptions about the CS. This finding emphasizes a need for further training among physicians to satisfy parents and in ultimately improving child health in the KSA.

Objective Physicians on the frontline of the COVID‐19 pandemic are at increased risk of contracting the disease. Otolaryngologists are amongst the high‐risk practitioners, as they are in close proximity to patient's upper airway, which may induce their psychological stress. Methods A cross‐sectional survey study, conducted among otolaryngologists in Saudi Arabia from June 11 to June 22. Survey consisted of sociodemographic questionnaire, Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS), Obsession with COVID‐19 Scale (OCS) and Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 (PHQ‐9). Available otolaryngologists with no history of mental health problems were included. A P‐value lower than .05 was considered statistically significant. Results The study included 129 participants; 63.6% men and 36.4% women. 81.4% of participants were living with family, 57.4% living with either a child or an elderly family member. Nearly 7.8% of participants had dysfunctional COVID‐19 anxiety and 75.2% had COVID‐19‐related depression symptoms ranging from minimal to severe. Obsession and dysfunctional thinking regarding COVID‐19 were found in 26.4% of participants. Single otolaryngologists had significantly higher CAS (P = .025), OCS (P = .048), and PHQ‐9 (P < .001) scores. Participants who lived with children or elderly individuals had significantly higher OCS scores (P = .005). When comparing job ranks, residents had significantly higher scores for the CAS (P = .016) and PHQ‐9 (P < .001). Conclusion COVID‐19 has a considerable psychological impact on otolaryngologists. Specifically, the young and single who have less social support. This indicates the importance of psychological support to this group. Additional thorough studies should explore the psychological impact of COVID‐19 in this field as it may carry devastating long‐term consequences if left unattended. Level of evidence Level 4.

Objective To investigate the clinical features, therapeutic efficacy and symptom time course of post-coronavirus disease 2019 parosmia. Methods A 22-item online questionnaire was distributed to AbScent research group and Facebook coronavirus disease 2019 anosmia group adult members to assess clinical features, interventions and their subjective efficacy for parosmia. Results A total of 209 participants (86 per cent females) reported: smell loss on average 3 days after coronavirus symptoms, recovery 4 weeks later, and first parosmia symptoms 12 weeks post infection. Respondents reported 10 per cent body weight loss, and listed onion and garlic as significant parosmia triggers. Regarding quality of life, depression was the most cited item (54 per cent). Smell training was trialled by 74 per cent of participants, followed by nasal corticosteroid spray (49 per cent). Stellate ganglion block, trialled by 16 per cent of respondents, had the highest reported improvement (45 per cent), with 21 per cent reporting a sustained benefit – the highest rate amongst registered treatment options. Conclusion Post-coronavirus parosmia has a significant impact and remains challenging to treat. Stellate ganglion block appears to be successful relative to other reported treatments. Further research into the pathophysiology, efficacy and mechanism of stellate ganglion block effect is warranted.