The priority for using the Village Fund in 2020 has changed along with the existence of financial policies for handling the dissemination of COVID-19 in the village. Based on this, the Village Fund (DD) is prioritized used for handling the COVID-19, one of the priorities is for Direct Cash Assistance (BLT). In its implementation, the Direct Cash Assistance of the Village Fund (BLT-DD) policy has caused many polemics. Based on these problems, the purpose of this paper is to explore the factors that influence the implementation performance of BLT DD distribution. The method used in this research is qualitative exploratory. Data collection was conducted by means of observation, interviews, and literature study. The results displayed that the factors affecting the implementation performance were caused by; first, the factor of clarity of policy content, village volunteers found it difficult to collect data on BLT-DD Beneficiary Families (KPM) due to the criteria set fluctuated and the number of KPM was limited based on the percentage of The Village Funds received by the village. The second, the Regulatory Inconsistency Factor. The changing regulations made it difficult for the village government to implement the BLT-DD distribution. Third, technical factors. The process of disbursing the BLT-DD was long enough to prevent The Village Government from delivering BLT-DD on time.

No abstract

Penelitian ini berusaha untuk menganalisa kebijakan strategis serta local wisdom yang ada di masyarakat setempat dalam menata dan mengelola hutan di Provinsi Riau. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan tipe penelitian studi kasus. Penelitian ini berkesimpulan bahwa tata kelola hutan dan lahan di Riau masih buruk. Pemerintah juga belum serius melaksanakan strategi yang sudah dibuat untuk penyelesaian kasus kebakaran hutan dan lahan ini. Peningkatan anggaran dalam upaya preventif haruslah dibarengi dengan upaya perbaikan tata kelola anggaran yang lebih transparan dan akuntabel. Peran Pemda untuk mengatasi kondisi degradasi lahan yang belum membaik harus menjadi prioritas yang tidak boleh diabaikan.

This article discusses public beliefs in results of quick count in 2019 elections. There was a problem of differences in public perception of the quick count results which caused various polemics in the community. The phenomenon occurs when people disagree to accuse fraud and conspiracy by one of the candidates with the pollsters and the media. The theory explained that there are still people who have not been able to distinguish between original news or facts and hoax. Through a media framing analysis approach, this study explains the impact of divisions among the people who perceive very different quick count results. Based on the facts or data, voter distortion in the election against the quick count results is caused by the lack of political education and civic culture for election participants in Indonesia.

This study dims to determine how the impact of the replanting program for oil palm plantation on the welfare of the community and to find out how the attitudes or behavior of oil palm farmers in Keranji Guguh. Based on the regulation of the minister Agriculture in Indonesian number : 18/permentan/KB. 330/5/2016 concerning guldelines for rejuvenation of oil palm plantations in 2016. This research is descriptive by using qualitative method. Data collection is done by holding observations, interviews and documentation. While the data sources used are primary and secondary data sources. Based on the results of this study, the impact of the oil palm plantation replanting program on the welfare of the Keranji Guguh community in the Koto Gasib sub-district of Siak Regency, the farmers’ income is no longer available and the non-productive period of oil palm. It is on of the reason for the replanting program. As for the replanting program carried out in Keranji Guguh village, they were using the system uprooted in unison. While the efforts made by oil palm farmers in the Keranji Guguh village were to face the replanting period in the form of external and internal efforts. External efforts from Siak district government such as ducks, chickens and catfish. While internal efforts are farmers working as their daily needs