Few natural calamities surpass floods in their destructive capabilities. The recent floods in Pakistan were declared the world’s deadliest since the South Asian floods of 2020 and were, by far, the most destructive floods in the country’s history. They have resulted in significant loss of life and property and have served as the harbingers of cutaneous and noncutaneous diseases. These floods have dealt a critical blow to the country’s already struggling healthcare system, which lacks resources for the prompt mobilization of medical personnel and resources to the flood-hit areas. Having lost their houses, the flood victims are wholly exposed to the elements. Lack of access to a clean water supply has predisposed them to a myriad of diseases. We believe that the consolidation of efforts by the national and international community will put an end to the plight of these flood victims. Our article highlights the significant diseases associated with floods, the challenges faced by the flood victims, and recommendations on how their situation can be improved.
e19547 Background: Hairy cell leukaemia (HCL) is a rare, chronic B cell cancer that involves the bone marrow, peripheral blood, and spleen. Many treatment options are available for HCL. Our study aims to elucidate the safety and efficacy of each intervention through the pooled proportion of response to treatment and adverse events. Methods: We conducted a literature search across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Google Scholar from inception till February 2023. We included clinical trials and cohorts of patients with HCL receiving modern anticancer drugs (cladribine, rituximab, cladribine plus rituximab, BRAF inhibitors, anti-CD22 monoclonal antibodies, and ibrutinib). The primary efficacy outcomes were Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Complete Response Rate (CRR) and the primary safety outcome was adverse effects (AEs). We used OpenMetaAnalyst to pool data using the Hedges-Olkin Random Effects Model, with subgroup analysis for HCL type and study design. Results: Our meta-analysis included 44 studies (28 trials and 16 cohorts) with 3976 patients with HCL. The median age was 56.7 years. The highest efficacy was seen in patients receiving combination therapy of cladribine and rituximab, with an ORR of 97% and CRR of 92%. Cladribine monotherapy showed an ORR of 95% and CRR of 79%, while rituximab monotherapy had an ORR of 62% and CRR of 31%. BRAF inhibitors, anti-CD22 monoclonal antibodies, and ibrutinib showed less efficacy, with ORRs of 92%,78% and 51% and CRRs of 41%, 49%, and 17% respectively. Subgroup analysis for study design and HCL type did not resolve heterogeneity. The ORR and CRR with 95% Confidence Intervals and AEs for each regimen are given in the table. Conclusions: Cladribine with rituximab is the most effective treatment for untreated and relapsed HCL patients, with neutropenia as the most common AE. Since we pooled the proportions for treatment-naïve and relapsed cases together due to inavailability of segregated data, the results should be used cautiously in clinical decision making and limit the derivation of consensus for treatment of newly diagnosed or relapsed HCL. [Table: see text]
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.