The presented paper deals with the influence of coloring additives and the setting of process parameters of 3D printing on the mechanical and surface properties of samples made of PLA material. The paper characterizes the process of filament production, as well as the printing of normalized samples on a 3D printer using the additive method Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF). The effect of 3 types of coloring additives is evaluated on the basis of tensile test, hardness test and surface analysis. The evaluated quantities are especially loading force, yield stress, hardness, surface texture, roughness and waviness. The influence of the percentage of sample filling with respect to the mechanical properties of the material is also evaluated. The paper is completed assessing achievements of the results achieved and an overall recommendation for filament manufacturers and users of 3D printers.

The aim of the article is describe duplex treatment of austenitic stainless steel X12CrNi 18 8 surface. Combination of both plasma nitriding and PVD coating by TiN/TiCN as a surface treatment has been used to improve material hardness and wear resistance without decreasing corrosion resistance. GDOES, confocal microscopy, microhardness, indentation test were applied to characterize the chemical composition, surface morphology, adhesion and hardness of duplex treated specimens.

The presented article deals with the determination of selected mechanical properties of additive materials used for 3D printing (PETG, PLA, ABS, ABS +, PLA ESD, ASA, PC / ABS). Due to the fact that 3D printing has exploded over recent years and additive manufacturing has become popular in some industries, the quality of input materials and their mechanical properties is extremely important. We used 3D printer Original Prusa MK3 to prepare samples for testing. Individual samples printed from all above mentioned materials were analyzed using selected mechanical tests (static tensile test, hardness tests). In the static tensile test, selected parameters (tensile strength limit, tensile modulus, elongation) were determined for all additive samples, which were statistically processed. The parameters for two methods of measuring hardness were also statistically evaluated, namely Shore and ball indentation. All tested additive materials were compared with the aim of obtaining the final ranking (point evaluation of tested materials with quantification of price costs). The best properties after the performed tests were achieved by the additive material PLA Filament Plasty Mladeč. Aditive manufacturing 3D printing Fused filament fabrication Mechanical properties Tensile test Hardness tests

This paper deals with basic methodology of surface evaluation of functional surfaces, which were prepared by various machining methods (turning, milling and grinding). Here are the basic 2D (profile) parameters and 3D (spatial) parameters and their properties in relation to the machined surface. Parameters of machined surfaces were obtained by CCI Lite Coherence Correlation Interferometer from Taylor Hobson and evaluated using the TalyMap Platinum software. The article further demonstrates the inappropriateness of the surface structure assessment with only the parameter Ra (mean arithmetic deviation of the profile), which is the most common method in technical practice. This methodology extends the possibilities of a comprehensive assessment of exposed surfaces of machine parts.

In this work, the influence of material type and sample fill density was evaluated. One PLA material was tested. Test specimens having different fill structure and density were printed from this material. Full honeycomb and gyroid shapes were used for the fill structure. The specimens had four different fill percentages for each structure: 10%, 25%, 50% and 75%. These bodies were compared to samples that were printed with 100% fill. Tensile test was performed on printed test pieces. The Zwick / Roell Z100 was used for testing and the surface hardness of the test specimens was measured by the Shore D method on a DIGI-Test II hardness tester. Fracture surfaces were evaluated on an Olympus DSX 500 optodigital microscope. The results showed that the shape of the fill did not significantly affect the values obtained by the tensile test. The hardness measurement results showed a different hardness on the bottom surface that was in contact with the printing pad and the top printing surface. Fractographic analysis revealed different types of fracture surfaces related to the printed fill structure.