Equinatoxin II (EqtII) belongs to a unique family of 20-kDa pore-forming toxins from sea anemones. These toxins preferentially bind to membranes containing sphingomyelin and create cation-selective pores by oligomerization of 3-4 monomers. In this work we have studied the binding of EqtII to lipid membranes by the use of lipid monolayers and surface plasmon resonance (SPR). The binding is a two-step process, separately mediated by two regions of the molecule. An exposed aromatic cluster involving tryptophans 112 and 116 mediates the initial attachment that is prerequisite for the next step. Steric shielding of the aromatic cluster or mutation of Trp-112 and -116 to phenylalanine significantly reduces the toxin-lipid interaction. The second step is promoted by the N-terminal amphiphilic helix, which translocates into the lipid phase. The two steps were distinguished by the use of a double cysteine mutant having the N-terminal helix fixed to the protein core by a disulfide bond. The kinetics of membrane binding derived from the SPR experiments could be fitted to a two-stage binding model. Finally, by using membraneembedded quenchers, we showed that EqtII does not insert deeply in the membrane. The first step of the EqtII binding is reminiscent of the binding of the evolutionarily distant cholesterol-dependant cytolysins, which share a similar structural motif in the membrane attachment domain.Targeting and attachment of proteins to membranes is one of the key steps in many cellular processes (1-3). Protein-membrane interactions have been studied intensively in recent years with many different examples of proteins and membranes. These interactions can be promoted at the lipid-water interface by lipid anchors, electrostatic forces or surface-exposed aromatic and aliphatic residues (1, 2, 4). Compared with protein-protein interactions, details of protein-membrane interactions are poorly defined. Some of the best characterized examples are a phospholipase C pleckstrin homology domain specific for phosphatidylinositol trisphosphate (5) and small protein kinase-C-conserved (C2) domains specific for zwitterionic, particularly phosphatidylcholine membranes (6).Another group of proteins interacting with lipid membranes are pore-forming toxins (PFT) 1 (7-10), which bind to membranes before eliciting their toxic effects via the formation of transmembrane pores. The most studied PFT are bacterial since this group includes important virulence factors. Few examples of eukaryotic PFT have been well characterized, exceptions being the actinoporins, cytolysins found exclusively in sea anemones (10, 11). Members of this family have properties distinct from other PFT: they are composed of 175-179 amino acids, contain no cysteine residues, have pIϾ9.5, and show a preference for sphingomyelin (SM)-containing membranes. Actinoporins act on cellular and model lipid membranes by forming cation-selective pores with a hydrodynamic diameter of ϳ2 nm. The mechanism of pore formation involves at least two steps: binding of the water soluble m...
Sphingomyelin (SM) is abundant in the outer leaflet of the cell plasma membrane, with the ability to concentrate in so-called lipid rafts. These specialized cholesterol-rich microdomains not only are associated with many physiological processes but also are exploited as cell entry points by pathogens and protein toxins. SM binding is thus a widespread and important biochemical function, and here we reveal the molecular basis of SM recognition by the membrane-binding eukaryotic cytolysin equinatoxin II (EqtII). The presence of SM in membranes drastically improves the binding and permeabilizing activity of EqtII. Direct binding assays showed that EqtII specifically binds SM, but not other lipids and, curiously, not even phosphatidylcholine, which presents the same phosphorylcholine headgroup. Analysis of the EqtII interfacial binding site predicts that electrostatic interactions do not play an important role in the membrane interaction and that the two most important residues for sphingomyelin recognition are Trp 112 and Tyr 113 exposed on a large loop. Experiments using site-directed mutagenesis, surface plasmon resonance, lipid monolayer, and liposome permeabilization assays clearly showed that the discrimination between sphingomyelin and phosphatidylcholine occurs in the region directly below the phosphorylcholine headgroup. Because the characteristic features of SM chemistry lie in this subinterfacial region, the recognition mechanism may be generic for all SM-specific proteins. Sphingomyelin (SM)8 is an important eukaryotic membrane lipid, located for the most part in the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane in the form of specialized cholesterol-rich microdomains, so-called lipid rafts (1, 2). Many pathogens and toxic proteins employ lipid rafts to invade cells (3, 4), but currently little is known about the molecular details of the recognition mechanism of the lipid components present in the rafts. In the particular case of SM, the specific recognition occurs even though SM exposes the same phosphorylcholine headgroup as the other abundant lipid, phosphatidylcholine. SM-binding proteins are currently exploited as specific markers for cellular SM (5) and are used to identify other proteins involved in sphingolipid metabolism (6).Actinoporins are extremely potent cytolysins produced exclusively by sea anemones (7,8). They may be used to capture prey, in intraspecific aggression, or in preventing adhesion of other organisms (7, 9). The two most studied representatives are EqtII, isolated from the sea anemone Actinia equina, and sticholysin II (StII) from Stichodactyla helianthus. Actinoporins constitute a family of conserved proteins that cause hemolysis of red blood cells by colloid-osmotic lysis and exhibit cytolytic activity against various cell lines (7, 10 -12). Even the most distant members of the family share more than 60% sequence identity and the available threedimensional structures of EqtII and StII are nearly superimposable (13-15). The structure is composed of a tightly folded -sandwich flanked b...
The nucleotide sequence of the Bacillus licheniformis bacitracin-resistance locus was determined. The presence of three open reading frames, bcrA, bcrB and bcrC, was revealed. The BcrA protein shares a high degree of homology with the hydrophilic ATP-binding components of the ABC family of transport proteins. The bcrB and bcrC genes were found to encode hydrophobic proteins, which may function as membrane components of the permease. Apart from Bacillus subtilis, these genes also confer resistance upon the Gram-negative Escherichia coli. The presumed function of the Bcr transporter is to remove the bacitracin molecule from its membrane target. In addition to the homology of the nucleotide-binding sites, BcrA protein and mammalian multidrug transporter or P-glycoprotein share collateral detergent sensitivity of resistant cells and possibly the mode of Bcr transport activity within the membrane. The advantage of the resistance phenotype of the Bcr transporter was used to construct deletions within the nucleotide-binding protein to determine the importance of various regions in transport.
Population-wide tolerance and persisters enable susceptible bacterial cells to endure hostile environments, including antimicrobial exposure. The SOS response can play a significant role in the generation of persister cells, population-wide tolerance, and shielding. The SOS pathway is an inducible DNA damage repair system that is also pivotal for bacterial adaptation, pathogenesis, and diversification. In addition to the two key SOS regulators, LexA and RecA, some other stressors and stress responses can control SOS factors. Bacteria are exposed to DNA-damaging agents and other environmental and intracellular factors, including cigarette smoke, that trigger the SOS response at a number of sites within the host. The Escherichia coli TisB/IstR module is as yet the only known SOS-regulated toxin-antitoxin module involved in persister formation. Nevertheless, the SOS response plays a key role in the formation of biofilms that are highly recalcitrant to antimicrobials and can be abundant in persisters. Furthermore, the dynamic biofilm environment generates DNA-damaging factors that trigger the SOS response within the biofilm, fueling bacterial adaptation and diversification. This review highlights the SOS response in relation to antimicrobial recalcitrance to antimicrobials in four clinically significant species, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Actinoporins are eukaryotic pore-forming proteins that create 2-nm pores in natural and model lipid membranes by the self-association of four monomers. The regions that undergo conformational change and form part of the transmembrane pore are currently being defined. It was shown recently that the N-terminal region (residues 10 -28) of equinatoxin, an actinoporin from Actinia equina, participates in building of the final pore wall. Assuming that the pore is formed solely by a polypeptide chain, other parts of the toxin should constitute the conductive channel and here we searched for these regions by disulfide scanning mutagenesis. Only double cysteine mutants where the N-terminal segment 1-30 was attached to the -sandwich exhibited reduced hemolytic activity upon disulfide formation, showing that other parts of equinatoxin, particularly the -sandwich and importantly the C-terminal ␣-helix, do not undergo large conformational rearrangements during the pore formation. The role of the -sandwich stability was independently assessed via destabilization of a part of its hydrophobic core by mutations of the buried Trp 117 . These mutants were considerably less stable than the wild-type but exhibited similar or slightly lower permeabilizing activity. Collectively these results show that a flexible N-terminal region and stable -sandwich are pre-requisite for proper pore formation by the actinoporin family.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.