NLR and Alb level to establish a modified systemic inflammation score (mSIS). These 184 patients were divided into 3 groups: group 1 (mSIS score of 0), group 2 (mSIS score of 1), and group 3 (mSIS score of 2). The mean OS of these three groups were 42 months (95% CI: 31.4-53.12), 77 months (95% CI: 68.5-87.5), and 89 months (95% CI: 71.4-82.7), respectively (P < 0.001). The Harrell's concordance index (C-index) of mSIS is 0.725. The mSIS could be used to discriminate patients categorized in the low-risk group of International Prognostic Index (IPI) (P < 0.001) and the low-risk and intermediate-risk prognostic index of natural killer cell lymphoma (PINK) group (P = 0.019). Conclusion: The pretreatment mSIS could be an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with ENKTL and warrants further research.

PurposePeripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) is a clinically and biologically heterogeneous disease with poor prognosis. As the role of radiation therapy (RT) is still unclear, we carried out this study to evaluate the potential efficacy of RT in PTCL-NOS.MethodsPatients diagnosed with PTCL-NOS between 2000 and 2016 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching was used to balance the characteristics between patients who received radiotherapy and those who did not receive radiotherapy. In addition, we validated the findings in an external validation cohort retrospectively recruited from two high-capacity cancer center in China between 2006 and 2016. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models were used for survival analysis.ResultsOf the 2,768 patients with chemotherapy records in the SEER cohort, 27.6% of 844 patients with early-stage disease and 6.8% of 1,924 patients with advanced-stage disease received RT. The application of RT was significantly associated with an improvement in overall survival (5-year OS rate 58.5 versus 35.1%, P &lt;0.001) and disease-specific survival (5-year DSS rate 66.3 versus 44.0%, P &lt;0.001) in the early-stage subgroup, while no apparent survival benefit of adding RT was identified in patients with advanced-stage disease (5-year OS rate 28.7 versus 24.4%, P = 0.089; 5-year DSS rate 32.9 versus 31.3%, P = 0.223). After adjustment, a matched cohort of 1,044 patients (348 in the RT combined with CT group and 696 in the CT alone group) was created. And RT was still significantly associated with a survival benefit in the early-stage subset, but not in the advanced-stage disease group. In the validation cohort with more comprehensive data, RT also significantly improved the survival of early-stage PTCL-NOS patients.ConclusionAdding RT was associated with significant improvement in survival in early-stage PTCL-NOS, but the survival benefit of RT was not obvious in advanced-stage disease. The incorporation of RT for treatment in early-stage PTCL-NOS should be highly considered. Further prospective studies with more comprehensive data are needed to evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of RT in PTCL-NOS.

No abstract

Background The high heterogeneity of de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (dmNPC) makes its prognosis and treatment challenging. We aimed to accurately stage dmNPC and assess the patterns of treatment strategies for different risk groups. Methods The study enrolled a total of 562 patients, 264 from 2007 to 2013 in the training cohort and 298 from 2014 to 2017 in the validation cohort. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to determine the independent variables for overall survival (OS). Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was applied to establish a novel risk-stratifying model based on these variables. Results After pairwise comparisons of OS, three risk groups were generated: low-risk (involved lesions ≤ 4 without liver involvement), intermediate-risk (involved lesions ≤ 4 with liver involvement or involved lesions > 4 with Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-DNA < 62,000 copies/ml), and high-risk (involved lesions > 4 with EBV-DNA > 62,000 copies/ml). The 3-year OS rate differed significantly between groups (80.4%, 42.0%, and 20.4%, respectively, all P < 0.05). Adding locoregional intensity-modulated radiotherapy (LRRT) followed by palliative chemotherapy (PCT) resulted in a significant OS benefit over PCT alone for the low- and intermediate-risk groups (P = 0.0032 and P = 0.0014, respectively). However, it provided no survival benefits for the high-risk group (P = 0.6). Patients did not benefit from concurrent chemotherapy during LRRT among the three subgroups (P = 0.12, P = 0.13, and P = 0.3, respectively). These results were confirmed with the validation cohort. Conclusions The novel RPA model revealed superior survival performance in subgroup stratification and could facilitate more effective treatment strategies for dmNPC.

No abstract