This study aims to extend understanding of the relationship between TLR3-involved cell signaling and dsRNA-induced embryo resorption. Upon stimulation of dsRNA, the resorption rate of embryos was boosted dramatically in syngeneic mating BALB/c mice, but not significantly influenced in syngeneic mating NOD/SCID mice. Accordingly, there was an enhanced cell surface expression of TLR3 on placental CD45+ cells derived from BALB/c mice, concomitant with both increased percentages of CD45+CD80+ cells and CD8α+CD80+ cells in flow cytometric analysis. In addition, both increased IL-2 and decreased IL-10 expression could be observed in CD45+ cell group in the intracellular detection by flow cytometry. In contrast, no such trends were observed in NOD/SCID model, and its resorption rate of embryos was kept at a low level throughout pregnancy. Neutralizing Abs against TLR3 could abrogate the embryo rejection induced by dsRNA in BALB/c mice, and simultaneously could reduce the CD80+ percentage in the CD45+ cell group. These results indicate that the interaction between dsRNA and TLR3 may be involved in the mobilization of CD45+CD80+ and CD8α+CD80+ cells, followed by the up-regulation of IL-2 and down-regulation of IL-10 expression at the feto-maternal interface, and finally resulting in embryo rejection. The relatively low responsiveness of NOD/SCID mice may be one of the reasons why these mice appeared to be resistant to dsRNA-induced embryo resorption.

Objective To explore the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with cognitive training on executive function and activities of daily living performance among stroke patients. Methods A total of 50 subjects were enrolled and randomly allocated into 2 groups of 25 each. The real-transcranial direct current stimulation group was simultaneously subjected to transcranial direct current stimulation and cognitive training, while the sham-transcranial direct current stimulation group was simultaneously subjected to sham transcranial direct current stimulation and cognitive training. At baseline, and after treatment, each subject was assessed with the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), Stroop Color-Word Test (SCWT), Digital Symbol Test (DST), Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADLs). Results After treatment, the gains in most indices of WCST, SCWT, DST, MMSE, MoCA and ADLs in the real-transcranial direct current stimulation group were significantly higher than those in the sham-transcranial direct current stimulation group ( p < 0.05). Nonetheless, no significant differences were noted in the gains in SCWT (including only Part A time and error, and Part B time) and activities of daily living (including only basic activities of daily living) between the 2 groups ( p > 0.05). Conclusion Transcranial direct current stimulation combined with cognitive training was found to significantly enhance executive function and instrumental activities of daily living performance among stroke patients. LAY ABSTRACT Executive function is the ability of an organization to plan and solve problems. The efficacy of use of a combination of transcranial direct current stimulation and cognitive training in the treatment of executive dysfunction among stroke patients remains undetermined. This is the first randomized controlled study of the effects of such treatment. The results indicate that a combination of transcranial direct current stimulation and cognitive training significantly enhances executive function and instrumental activities of daily living performance among stroke patients.

Alzheimer disease (AD) and sporadic cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) are common cognitive disorders. Both AD and CSVD have mental symptoms including chronic progressive cognitive impairment, dysfunction, and behavioral abnormalities. However, the differences on the cognitive dysfunction of AD and CSVD remain unclear. It is necessary to elucidate the cognitive dysfunction differences of AD and CSVD, and to identify the potential risk factors. AD or sporadic CSVD patients treated in our hospital from December 1, 2018 to May 31, 2019 were included. And we selected healthy participants as controls. The mini-mental state examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale were used for neuropsychological assessment, and related medical information were collected and compared. A total of 190 patients were included. The total mini-mental state examination scores in AD, CSVD group were significantly less than that of control group, there were significant differences in the domains of directional ability, attention and computing ability, delayed recall, and visual perception (all P < .05); the total Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale scores in AD, CSVD group were significantly less than that of control group. There were significant differences in the domains of visual space and execution, immediate remember, attention and computing ability, language, delayed recall, and directional ability (all P < .05); diabetes was a risk factor both for AD (hazard ratio = 1.63, 95% confidence interval: 1.35–1.97) and CSVD (hazard ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence interval: 1.08–1.27). The cognitive dysfunctions of AD are difference to that of CSVD patients, and diabetes is the risk factor both for AD and CSVD, future studies are needed to further identify the prevention and treatment of AD and CSVD.

Objective To test whether the presence of N30 somatosensory evoked potentials, generated from the supplementary motor area and premotor cortex, correlate with post-stroke spasticity, motor deficits, or motor recovery stage. Design A cross-sectional study. Patients A total of 43 patients with stroke hospitalized at Maoming People’s Hospital, Maoming, China. Methods Forty-three stroke patients underwent neurofunctional tests, including Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Brunnstrom stage, manual muscle test and neurophysiological tests, including N30 somatosensory evoked potentials, N20 somatosensory evoked potentials, motor evoked potentials, H-reflex. The results were compared between groups. Correlation and regression analyses were performed as well. Results: Patients with absence of N30 somatosensory evoked potential exhibited stronger flexor carpi radialis muscle spasticity (r = –0.50, p < 0.05) and worse motor function (r = 0.57, p < 0.05) than patients with presence of N30 somatosensory evoked potential. The generalized linear model (GLM) including both N30 somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials (Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) = 121.99) better reflected the recovery stage of the affected proximal upper limb than the models including N30 somatosensory evoked potentials (AIC = 125.06) or motor evoked potentials alone (AIC = 127.45). Conclusion N30 somatosensory evoked potential status correlates with the degrees of spasticity and motor function of stroke patients. The results showed that N30 somatosensory evoked potentials hold promise as a biomarker for the development of spasticity and the recovery of proximal limbs. LAY ABSTRACT Impair motor function and spasticity adversely affect the ability to conduct the activities of daily life. Somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials are essential to differential evaluation of degree of post-stroke spasticity and stage of motor recovery. This is the first study of the correlations between somatosensory evoked potentials N30, components of somatosensory evoked potentials related to the supplementary motor area and dorsolateral premotor cortex combined with motor evoked potentials and motor function. The results indicate that the N30 somatosensory evoked potential status is correlated with the degrees of spasticity and motor function of stroke patients. The conclusion showed that N30 Somatosensory evoked potentials hold promise as a biomarker for the development of spasticity and the recovery of proximal limbs

Aim To evaluate the potential influencing factors of acute stress disorder (ASD) in patients with accidental traumatic fractures to provide evidence for clinical nursing care. Design A retrospective study. Methods Patients with traumatic fractures treated in our hospital from 1 January 2020 to 30 November 2021 were included. The characteristics of ASD and no ASD patients were assessed. Results A total of 468 patients with traumatic fractures were included, the incidence of ASD was 28.20%. Logistic regression analysis showed that age ≤50 years (OR2.918, 95% CI1.994 ~ 3.421), female (OR2.074, 95% CI1.489 ~ 3.375), AIS‐ISS at admission ≥20 (OR3.981, 95% CI2.188 ~ 5.091), VAS at admission≥7 (OR2.804, 95% CI2.027 ~ 3.467), introverted personality (OR1.722, 95%CI1.314 ~ 2.432) and CD‐RISC at admission≤60 (OR3.026, 95% CI2.338 ~ 4.769) were the risk factors of ASD in patients with traumatic fractures (all p < .05). Conclusions The development of ASD in patients with traumatic fractures is affected by multiple factors. Medical workers should take early and timely management and nursing measures for related risk factors to reduce the occurrence of ASD.