With
the wide application of plastics in daily life, nanoplastics
(NPs) are ubiquitous in freshwater environments. However, to date,
few studies have focused on the mechanism underlying the toxicity
of NPs, and the differences between this mechanism and that governing
the toxicity of MPs have also not been thoroughly characterized. In
this study, the genotoxicity, intestinal damage, and intestinal flora
in Corbicula fluminea exposed to micro/nanoplastics
were investigated through RNA sequencing, histopathology, and 16S
rRNA sequencing, respectively. Significant differences in differentially
expressed genes (DEGs) were observed between MP and NP exposure groups.
It was observed that NPs preferentially elicited the process related
to cellular components and triggered the apoptosis through the mitochondrial
pathway in various tissues, especially in indirectly contacted tissues,
while MPs induced the innate immune response and activated the complement
and coagulation cascades (complement system) pathway. Both MPs and
NPs can induce an inflammatory response and cause epithelial damage
in the intestines, and they can notably change the gut microbial community
structure. However, the abundance of pathogenic bacteria (e.g., Mycoplasma) was observed to increase
only in the MP-treated group, which exacerbated intestinal damage.
Unlike MPs, the effect of NPs on the intestinal microflora was highly
limited, while NPs elicited more severe damage to the intestinal mucosal
barrier. The results of this study may help to elucidate the toxicity
mechanisms governing the responses of bivalves to MPs and NPs and
to evaluate the detriment of MPs and NPs to the benthic ecosystem.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.