Shear failure of reinforced concrete (RC) members belongs to brittle failure and has always been concerned. In this paper, 16 existing shear strength models of RC slender beams have been selected and comprehensively compared based on a set of 781 experimental test results. These formulas from eight national codes and eight published papers are mainly the semi-empirical models or the analytical models. These experimental test results were collected from 66 published papers, and the range of key parameters is relatively wide. The accuracy of these shear strength models is evaluated from overall prediction level and the effect of key parameters. These key parameters mainly contain concrete compressive strength, shear-span-to-depth ratio, effective depth, and stirrup ratio. According to the results of overall prediction and evaluation of key parameters, the prediction results of Zsutty’s, Gunawan’s, and Bazant–Kim’s models are more accurate than others for both beams with stirrups and without stirrups. The models of ACI and JSCE exhibit higher prediction accuracy and safety margin, and their average values are between 1.19 and 1.28. The results of this study may provide reference for the selection and/or improvement of the shear strength model for RC slender beams.
Sulfate attack is one of the main factors affecting the durability of concrete structures. In recent years, multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) have attracted the attention of scholars for their excellent mechanical properties and durability performance. In this paper, the influence of sulfate attack and dry–wet cycles on the performance of multi-walled carbon nanotube–lithium slag concrete (MWCNT-LSC) with varied MWCNT content (0 wt.%, 0.05 wt.%, 0.10 wt.%, and 0.15 wt.%) and varied water–cement ratios (0.35, 0.40, and 0.45) were investigated. In addition, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray computed tomography (CT) tests were conducted to analyze the microstructure and pore structure of the concrete. The results showed that concrete incorporated with MWCNTs could effectively mitigate sulfate attack. The resistance to sulfate attack of concrete was negatively related to the water–cement ratio when the dry–wet cycle was fixed. The MWCNT-LSC showed the best compressive strength at the water–cement ratio of 0.35 and 0.10 wt.% MWCNTs. The SEM test results showed that the MWCNTs filled the pores and cracks within the specimen and formed bridges between the cracks, enhancing the resistance to sulfate attack. The CT test results also showed that the addition of MWCNTs could reduce the porosity of concrete, refine the pore size and inhibit the generation and development of cracks, thus optimizing the internal structure of concrete and improving its resistance to sulfate attack.
An experimental study on the shear behavior of dune sand reinforced concrete (DSRC) deep beams was conducted to determine the feasibility of using dune sand (DS) in engineering. Nine DSRC deep beams were designed and thoroughly analyzed for failure modes, diagonal cracks, and load–deflection curves in this study. The results showed that the shear strength and ductility of DSRC deep beams increased when the DS replacement rate was 30%, but the opposite effect occurred when the DS replacement rate was 50%. To analyze the differences in the effects of the DS replacement rate, shear span-to-depth ratio, concrete strength, and stirrup ratio on the shear strength of DSRC and normal reinforced concrete (NRC) deep beams, a total of 227 shear experimental tests of NRC deep beams were conducted. Furthermore, four national codes were evaluated and compared based on experimental data. The evaluation results showed that the four codes underestimated the shear strength of DSRC and NRC deep beams. Among them, ACI 318–11 provided more reliable predictions for both NRC and DSRC deep beams. It is in this regard that a new empirical model for predicting the shear strength of DSRC deep beams is proposed, in which a reduction coefficient of the DS replacement rate is incorporated. The verification results indicates that the predicted results of the proposed model are in good agreement with the experimental results.
Examining the environmental risk sources of regional subway construction is crucial for ensuring construction safety and providing guidance for future subway line planning. This study focused on Urumqi’s main urban area and used SBAS-InSAR analysis technology to extract the settlement rate field within 600 m of Urumqi Metro Line 1 and investigate these risk sources. Results showed that the environmental risk sources affecting subway construction in the study area could be classified into four categories: geological conditions, distribution of high-rise buildings, density of road networks, and density of clustered buildings. The study further analyzed the spatial distribution of each risk source and developed a comprehensive impact zoning evaluation model for environmental risk sources in the study area. The model was then used to assess the risk of the currently planned subway lines (1–7), revealing that the largest area of subway construction environmental risk sources (1444 partitions) was associated with soil layer, IV high-rise building risk, IV road network risk, and IV building density risk. Additionally, the study found that environmental risk sources had the most significant impact on Metro Line 6, emphasizing the importance of closely monitoring risk factors during future construction.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.