Background: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures often address quality of life (QOL) and help improve communication and shared decision-making. The home parenteral nutrition patient-reported outcome questionnaire (HPN-PROQ) was developed for patients to self-assess factors that influence QOL. The aim of this study was to establish construct validity. Method: Responses were analyzed for 77 HPN-dependent patients with chronic and prolonged acute intestinal failure. General linear modeling was conducted to describe patterns of interactions and association between items included in the HPN-PROQ. Results: Most patients (78%) had chronic intestinal failure. Mean HPN duration was 3.3 ± 0.6 years. Underlying illness had a moderate or major effect on QOL for 88%; 59% reported their QOL had been negatively impacted by HPN. There was no difference in QOL among chronic patients, depending on how important they rated "being able to do what I want to do" (P = .1), whereas prolonged acute intestinal failure patients had significantly lower QOL if they rated "being able to do what I want to do" extremely vs very important (adjusted P = .02). Confidence with ability to perform HPN procedures was associated with understanding the need for HPN (P < .01). As ratings increased for emotional difficulty in coping with HPN so did HPN impact on QOL (linear trend P < .01). Conclusion: Construct validity of the HPN-PROQ was evident. The HPN-PROQ considers the unique experience of living with a complex nutrition therapy.

IMPORTANCEThe effect of and optimal timing for initiating supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) remain unclear after major abdominal surgery for patients in whom energy targets cannot be met by enteral nutrition (EN) alone.OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of early supplemental parenteral nutrition (E-SPN) (day 3 after surgery) or late supplemental parenteral nutrition (L-SPN) (day 8 after surgery) on the incidence of nosocomial infections in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery who are at high nutritional risk and have poor tolerance to EN. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSA multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted from April 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018, in the general surgery department of 11 tertiary hospitals in China. Participants were those undergoing major abdominal surgery with high nutritional risk and poor tolerance to EN (Յ30% of energy targets from EN on postoperative day 2, calculated as 25 and 30 kcal/kg of ideal body weight daily for women and men, respectively) and an expected postoperative hospital stay longer than 7 days. Data analysis was performed from February 1 to October 31, 2020.INTERVENTIONS Random allocation to E-SPN (starting on day 3 after surgery) or L-SPN (starting on day 8 after surgery). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe primary outcome was the incidence of nosocomial infections between postoperative day 3 and hospital discharge.RESULTS A total of 230 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.1 [11.2] years; 140 men [61.1%]; all patients were of Han race and Asian ethnicity) were randomized (115 to the E-SPN group and 115 to the L-SPN group). One patient in the L-SPN group withdrew informed consent before the intervention. The E-SPN group received more mean (SD) energy delivery between days 3 and 7 compared with the L-SPN group (26.5 [7.4] vs 15.1 [4.8] kcal/kg daily; P < .001). The E-SPN group had significantly fewer nosocomial infections compared with the L-SPN group (10/115 [8.7%] vs 21/114 [18.4%]; risk difference, 9.7%; 95% CI, 0.9%-18.5%; P = .04). No significant differences were found between the E-SPN group and the L-SPN group in the mean (SD) number of noninfectious complications (31/115 [27.0%] vs 38/114 [33.3%]; risk difference, 6.4%; 95% CI, −5.5% to 18.2%; P = .32), total adverse events (75/115 [65.2%] vs 82/114 [71.9%]; risk difference, 6.7%; 95% CI, −5.3% to 18.7%; P = .32), and rates of other secondary outcomes. A significant difference was found in the mean (SD) number of therapeutic antibiotic days between the E-SPN group and the L-SPN group (6.0 [0.8] vs 7.0 [1.1] days; mean difference, 1.0 days; 95% CI, 0.2-1.9 days; P = .01). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCEIn this randomized clinical trial, E-SPN was associated with reduced nosocomial infections in patients undergoing abdominal surgery and seems to be a favorable strategy for patients with high nutritional risk and poor tolerance to EN after major abdominal surgery.