No abstract

No abstract

Objectives. e integration of patient-reported health status has been increasingly emphasised for delivering high-quality care to advanced cancer patients. is research is designed to track health status changes over time in Chinese advanced cancer patients to explore the risk factors a ecting their health status. Methods. Advanced cancer patients were recruited from Peking University Cancer Hospital. An electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) system with validated measurements was used to collect the data. ANOVA, the chi-square test, the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis H test, and generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis were used for the data analysis. Results. One hundred and three patients completed a baseline survey (T = 0) and two follow-up surveys (T1 = 14 days, T2 = 28 days). Chi-square test results indicate a signi cant decrease in the percentage of patients reporting moderate or severe di culty experienced by patients in terms of mobility, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. However, there is a signi cant increase in the percentage of patients reporting moderate or severe di culty in self-care and usual activities. Scores on the visual analogue scale in the EQ-5D-5L instrument (EQ-VAS) are associated with patients' income, and the degree of moderate or severe anxiety/depression is found to be associated with employment status. e GEE results show that pain, loss of appetite, poor walking status e ected by symptoms, depression, and anxiety has worsened the health status. Conclusions. e health status of Chinese advanced cancer patients under ePRO follow-up in China signi cantly improves in the physical and psychological dimensions, accompanied by a decrease in usual activities and self-care. Routine screening and rational supportive care are recommended in oncology for cancer care. Based on the rational application of ePRO, longitudinal studies exploring the potential mechanisms of health status changing would provide more bene cial guidance for improving the quality of life in patients with advanced cancer.

Background Patients with cancer experience multiple symptoms related to cancer, cancer treatment, and the procedures involved in cancer care; however, many patients with pain, depression, and fatigue, especially those outside the hospital, receive inadequate treatment for their symptoms. Using an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) platform to conduct symptom management follow-up in outpatients with advanced cancer could be a novel and potentially effective approach. However, empirical evidence describing in detail the preparation and implementation courses in a real setting is needed. Objective The purpose of this paper was to describe the implementation process and evaluation of an ePRO platform that facilitates symptom management for patients with cancer, share our experiences and the problems we encountered during the process of implementation, and share the solutions we identified for those problems. Moreover, we tested the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the ePRO platform. Methods This was a real-world, ongoing, longitudinal, single-center, prospective study with a total of 7 follow-ups conducted within 4 weeks after the first visit to the symptom management clinic (on days 1, 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, and 28). Participants were encouraged to complete scales for physical symptoms (pain, fatigue, and shortness of breath), cognitive symptoms (memory problems and impaired concentration), and affective symptoms (especially depression and anxiety) during follow-up. The design and function of the ePRO-doctor client and ePRO-patient client, the patient-reported outcome (PRO) scales used in the study, and the strategies to promote symptom tracking have been described. Moreover, the training and evaluation for research assistants have been presented. The efficacy of the ePRO platform was assessed with a comparison of the baseline and 4-week outcomes on the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory. Results Using the ePRO platform for symptom management follow-ups in advanced cancer patients was associated with a high completion rate (72.7%-86.4%) and a low drop-off rate (23.6%). The ePRO platform sent 293 alert notifications to both patients and doctors, which promoted patient security. The short and sharp PRO tool selection, user-friendly interface, automatic reminder notifications and alerts, and multiple dimensional training were essential components for the preparation and implementation of the ePRO system. The results showed significant improvements in the mean scores of pain, fatigue, and numbness from baseline to day 28 (P=.02, P=.02, and P<.001, respectively). Conclusions The use of an ePRO platform for symptom management follow-ups in advanced cancer patients is time-saving, energy-saving, and effective. PRO tool selection, platform design, and training of research assistants are important aspects for implementation. Future research should validate the ePRO platform in a larger randomized controlled study.

Introduction Major depressive disorder (MDD) is associated with an increased risk of suicide and suicide attempt among cancer patients. However, we do not know how many cancer patients without MDD have suicidal ideation (SI). Objectives This study aimed to investigate the prevalence, characteristics and correlated factors of SI among advanced cancer patients without MDD. Methods This is a multi‐center, cross‐sectional study based on an electronic patient‐reported outcome systems in patients who were diagnosed with advanced lung, liver, gastric, esophageal, colorectal or breast cancer, the top six prevalent cancers in China. A total of 2930 advanced cancer patients were recruited from 10 regional representative cancer centers across China from August 2019 to December 2020. Patients completed the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 regarding if they had thoughts of being better off dead or of hurting themselves in some way in the previous 2 weeks. Patients also completed the symptom inventory and quality of life assessment. Generalized estimating equation model was performed to explore the correlated factors associated with SI among the patients without MDD. Results The overall prevalence of SI among advanced cancer patients without MDD was 13.1%. The prevalence was higher in older patients. After adjusted for existing conditions, patients with vomiting symptom (p < 0.001), poorer life quality (p < 0.001), and middle education level (p = 0.031) were correlated factors of SI. Conclusions The suicidal ideation is common in advanced cancer patients without MDD. Patients with vomiting, poor quality of life, and middle education level should be screened and monitored for suicidal ideation even without MDD. Clinical Trial Information ChiCTR1900024957.