ABSTRACT. Based on its characteristic oral apparatus, the ciliate subclass Peritrichia has long been recognized as a monophyletic assemblage composed of the orders Mobilida and Sessilida. Following the application of molecular methods, the monophyly of Peritrichia has recently been questioned. We investigated the phylogenetic relationships of the peritrichous ciliates based on four further complete small subunit ribosomal RNA sequences of mobilids, namely Urceolaria urechi, Trichodina meretricis, Trichodina sinonovaculae, and Trichodina ruditapicis. In all phylogenetic trees, the mobilids never clustered with the sessilids, but instead formed a monophyletic assemblage related to the peniculines. By contrast, the sessilids formed a sister clade with the hymenostomes at a terminal position within the Oligohymenophorea. We therefore formally separate the mobilids from the sessilids (Peritrichia sensu stricto) and establish a new subclass, Mobilia Kahl, 1933, which contains the order Mobilida Kahl, 1933. We argue that the oral apparatus in the mobilians and sessilid peritrichs is a homoplasy, probably due to convergent evolution driven by their similar life-styles and feeding strategies. Morphologically, the mobilians are distinguished from all other oligohymenophoreans by the presence of the adhesive disc, this character being a synapomorphy for the Mobilia.

ABSTRACT. Peritrich ciliates have been traditionally subdivided into two orders, Sessilida and Mobilida within the subclass Peritrichia. However, all the existing small subunit (SSU) rRNA phylogenetic trees showed that the sessilids and mobilids did not branch together. To shed some light on this disagreement, we tested whether or not the classic Peritrichia is a monophyletic group by assessing the reliability of the SSU rRNA phylogeny in terms of congruency with a-tubulin phylogeny. For this purpose, we obtained 10 partial a-tubulin sequences from peritrichs and built phylogenetic trees based on a-tubulin nucleotide and amino acid data. A phylogenetic tree from the a-tubulin and SSU rRNA genes in combination was also constructed and compared with that from the SSU rRNA gene using a similar species sampling. Our results show that the mobilids and sessilids are consistently separated in all trees, which reinforces the idea that the peritrichs do not constitute a monophyletic group. However, in all a-tubulin gene trees, the urceolariids and trichodiniids do not group together, suggested mobilids may not be a monophyletic group.

No abstract